Get Adobe Flash player

MMR Vaccine Fraud at the CDC (Centre for Disease Control)

Hello Dear Reader, just heard Jon Rappoport’s interview on Redice Radio last night and had to post it for you ASAP.
He tells of whistleblower William Thompson grappling with his conscience as he admits the CDC committed fraud and lied about a study that tried to bury the very real connection between the MMR and autism.

This is so very, very, wrong, how many hundreds of thousands of children have been forced to endure the tragic consequences of often very severe brain damage inflicted upon them through having the MMR ? Their families left tearing their hair out contending with the daily routine of caring for them.

You must share this friends, the cruel, twisted minds of those responsible for lying about the effects of the MMR vaccine must be brought to account.
This story should be headline news but the medical cartel have so much power over governments and the media that they dare not speak out, how disgraceful, how shameful that their jobs or reputation means more to them than protecting all children from this unnecessary evil. I could cry.
Let the article and video speak for themselves, love to you all, Janie, xxx

“Vaccination is a monstrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance: it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine…Believe not in vaccination, it is a world wide delusion, an unscientific practise, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.”

Charles Rauta, Professor of Hygiene and Material Medical in the University of Perguia, New York, New York Journal of Medicine 1899

CDC lied just before whistleblower went public

by Jon Rappoport

September 25, 2014


August 25, 2014—the CDC publishes a press release defending its 2004 study on autism.

August 27, 2014—CDC whistleblower publicly admits he and his co-authors cooked that study and committed fraud.

On August 25th, the CDC issued a press release, “Statement Regarding 2004 Pediatrics [study],…”

The CDC was referring to the 2004 study whistleblower William Thompson co-authored, the study he admitted was fraudulent, the study he and his co-authors slanted to bury the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Thompson went public with his confession on August 27th, two days after the CDC posted its press release. So the CDC knew or strongly suspected Thompson was going to go public, and they wanted to head him off at the pass and do a bit of damage control.

Hence, the August 25th CDC press release, which of course tried to defend the scientific validity of the 2004 study.

I’d say there is a strong chance Thompson told his CDC bosses he was going to issue a confession.

Why? Thompson wanted to smooth the waters, keep his job at the CDC, and personally avoid the nasty consequences that would flow from springing a complete surprise on his employers.

The CDC’s August 25th press release contains language specifically directed at what Thompson would allude to, two days later:

The subset of black male babies who showed a much higher risk of autism after receiving the MMR vaccine.

Data on this group, Thompson would confess, was omitted from the study.

Here is the key CDC quote of August 25:

“Access to the information on the birth certificates [of children in the study] allowed researchers to assess more complete information on race as well as other important characteristics, including possible risk factors for autism such as the child’s birth weight, mother’s age, and education. This information was not available for the children without birth certificates; hence CDC study did not present data by race on black, white, or other race children from the whole study sample. It presented the results on black and white/other race children from the group with birth certificates.”

Translation: The authors of the study did a complete analysis of vaccinated children and their risk of autism, including children without birth certificates…and then much later said, “Oops, guess what? We just realized there are some kids without birth certificates. We’ll have to eliminate them from the study.”

Believe that and I have condos for sale on Neptune.

But there’s more. These “kids without birth certificates,” who were dropped from the study, miraculously and accidentally happened to be the ones who showed a much higher risk of autism.

Believe that and I’ll sell you Neptune.

Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at

Did you like this? Share it:

Bullingdon Boy’s Bollox

Hello Dear Reader, when, oh when are the masses going to stop believing such blatant lies…the outcome of today’s (Friday 26th Sept; 2014) assembly in Parliament is so very predictable. The ruling class are so desperate to continue their manipulated war’s, they’ve saturated the media with their repetitious propaganda, ensuring the fear factor is deeply embedded within the average serf so they all cry in unison to obliterate those responsible for the beheadings of hostages.

The despicable waste of money is obscene in itself but the certain loss of human life is deplorable, what in Gods name are they thinking ?
And where are the so-called ‘celebrities’ voices in all of this ? Why doesn’t anyone of them stand up and be counted ? I think I know the answer, they have all sold their soul to the devil and daren’t oppose a thing that their evil, depraved controllers do.

There’s quite a bit here for you to view, the last clip gives you a peep at just one aspect of all that is wrong here in the UK and could be put right with just a small fraction of the cost of bombs. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“I foresee that man will resign himself each day to new abominations, and soon only bandits and soldiers will be left.” Jorge Luis Borges

The story is ISIS shot this video and made it available to the “news media” (i.e. Ministry of Loony Propaganda)

It purportedly shows Allied Forces (the good guys) bombing an artillery piece of ISIS (the bad guys.)

The problem is there seems to be an awful lot of cooperation between the good guys and the bad guys in this video.

For example:

1. The first segment shows lots of bad guys milling around the target, but then with a quick cut they’re all gone – except for one guy in the foreground.

2. This one combatant (actor) seems to know something is about to happen well before it happens and covers his ears.

3. The “missile” appears to fall straight from the sky and hit the target, the artillery piece, perfectly and “luckily” the guy covering his ears and the cameraman (and crew) are far enough away to be uninjured.

Do you see the total ludicrousness of this scenario?

Some basic questions:

How did the bad guys know to leave the scene before the explosion?

Why was the video edited the way it was?

How did the one guy who remained – far away – know to cover his ears well in advance of the “strike”?

Who says the artillery piece wasn’t blown up by a charge placed on it?

Who says that “missile” wasn’t added later in post-production?

Sloppy, careless BS because they think no one is looking and/or has the sense to call nonsense what it is.

- See more at:

Stop The War Coalition

Ten reasons why the British parliament should vote no to bombing Iraq
Chris Nineham 24 September 2014. Posted in News
On Friday 26 September, David Cameron will ask MPs to vote in favour of joining the US bombing campaign in Iraq and take the UK into yet another Middle East war.

Not in my name
Iraq war last time, when two million on London’s streets said, not in my name.
Ten reasons why MPs should vote no

1) The West’s last operation in Iraq ended just three years ago. For those with a short memory it didn’t go well. More than half a million people died, millions fled the country and Iraq’s infrastructure was devastated. The operation generated deep resentment against the West.

2) The current chaos in Iraq – including the rise of the reactionary Isis – is largely the result of the eight years of that occupation. On top of the trauma of the assault, sectarian division was built into the operation. Elections were organised along communal lines and the authorities used sectarianism to undermine resistance. By 2006, Baghdad had been turned from an integrated, modern city into a patchwork of ruined communal ghetoes.The open discrimination of the Western-backed Maliki government detonated a Sunni insurgency last year that helped fuel the rise of Isis in Iraq.

3) Bombing always kills and terrorises civilians. Recent coalition bombing raids on Raqqa in Syria have brought death and panic to its residents. One civilian there told western reporters ‘I would not wish them on my worst enemy’.

4) All three of Britain’s major military interventions in the last thirteen years have been disasters. In 2001 we were told an invasion of Afghanistan would rout the Taliban. Thirteen years and tens of thousands of deaths later the Taliban have grown in strength and the country is broken. The bombing of Libya in 2011 was justified as essential to stop a massacre by Gaddafi. After it began an estimated 30,000 were killed in a terrifying cycle of violence. The country is now a failed state with no real government.

5) The coalition that has been put together for the bombing of Syria – apparently in an effort to give the attacks legitimacy – comprises some of the most ruthless and benighted regimes in the region. Human Rights Watch reports that nineteen people were beheaded in Saudi Aarbia in August. Qatar and UAE have notorious human rights’ records that include the use of forced labour. All three have funded violent Jihadi groups in the region.

6) Bombing raids will increase hatred of the west. One of the wider results of the ‘War on Terror’ has been to spread Al- Quaida and other terrorist groups across whole regions of the world. In 2001 there were relatively small numbers of such militants, centred mainly on Pakistan. Now there are groups across the middle east, central Asia and Africa.

7) The timing is cynical. David Cameron has recalled parliament to debate an attack on Iraq just two days before the start of the last Tory Conference before the general election. This at a time when he is engaged in pushing a right wing, nationalist agenda for party political purposes.

8) Mission creep is almost inevitable. There are already more than a thousand US military active in Iraq and senior US military figures are arguing they should now be openly involved in fighting. In Britain a growing number of voices from Tony Blair to Lieutenant General Sir Graeme Lamb are recommending British boots on the ground.

9) The attack will cost money much needed for other things. One Tomahawk cruise missile costs £850,000, enough to pay the annual salary of 28 NHS nurses. The US has already fired about 50 of these missiles at Isis targets in Syria. It is estimated Britain spent between £500 million and one billion pounds bombing Libya in 2011. This was roughly the same as the savings made by ending the education maintenance allowance (EMA); or three times the amount saved by scrapping the disability living allowance.

10) The vote will have a global impact. On Friday, MPs have a chance to make a real difference on matters of peace and war. The US wants Britain on board to prove it is not isolated. When MPs blocked Cameron’s last push for airstrikes, on Syria a year ago, they stopped Obama launching attacks too. A no vote could help reverse the drift towards another full scale western war in the middle east.

David Cameron and how the ISIS theatre of murder was born
Heathcote Williams 19 September 2014. Posted in News
Poet Heathcote Williams responds to David Cameron’s declaration that he is “standing firm and will not be cowed” by ISIS barbarity.


David Cameron and ISIS
As a millionaire member of the Chipping Norton set
Cameron brown-noses racists and phone-hackers,
And he’s said that the idea of prisoners voting has made him “physically ill” –
This man, who favours nuclear bombs and who finances frackers.
After killing 15,000 people in Libya,
David Cameron felt like a break
So he took off for the Scottish Island of Jura
And his mega-rich father-in-law’s estate.

Viscount Astor’s spread includes a cottage
Where George Orwell wrote ’1984′
But rather than the Premier absorbing its message
He slaughters birds with his pricey twelve-bore;

And as a change from his blood-letting in Libya,
Where he was Obama’s obliging minion,
He’d fondle a .234-calibre rifle and then exult
As the stag he was stalking spurted crimson.

“He who controls the past controls the future”
Orwell wrote and most people would deduce
That being a murderous busybody might be risky
Since your chickens could come home to roost.

But Cameron’s been supplying weapons to those forces
Whom he’s urged to change their regimes,
And he cannot see that by his foolishly playing with fire
He might provoke some unsavoury scenes.

At the first sign of great changes in the Arab world,
Namely at the height of the Arab Spring,
What does he do but embark on an arms-selling spree
So oil tyrant pals can stay safe doing their thing.

As an ex-Public Relations spiv for a tacky tv company
With inherited wealth from Dad’s tax haven racket,
The Bullingdon Club’s Bunter knows that social unrest
Can provide ruthless arms dealers with a meal ticket.

He and the opportunists Blair, Bush and Obama created Isis
Or IS, now stalking Westerners in Syria and Iraq,
And as cruel toffs display stags’ heads in baronial castles
Cruel ISIS displays their victims’ heads with severed necks.

During the Iraq war, supported by David Cameron,
The allies destroyed 36,000 of Fallujah’s homes
With air strikes, white phosphorous and cluster bombs,
They pulverised the Fallujah mosques’ domes,

The City of two hundred Sunni mosques was reduced
To no more than a pile of rubble;
Oblivious to their instituting a cycle of violence,
Ignorant of making a blueprint for trouble.

But after killing a thousand civilians, and causing cancer
And birth defects and maximum distress
By their forcing 300,000 Fallujah inhabitants to flee,
Fallujah would lead inevitably to IS.

When four US marines in combat gear
Took out their genitals on camera
To urinate on the bodies of Afghans they’d killed
and jeered, ‘Have a great day, buddy’, and ‘Yeahhhh!’
And when the urinating GIs groaned with relief while they cackled,
‘The first bath they have had in years!’
And when Muslims read the comments of the GIs’ US admirers
Such as ‘We’re all proud of you guys’,

And ‘cut their heads off and bury them with a pig’, then it’s not hard to see
How IS’s theatre of murder was born:
How by war crimes in Afghanistan, in Libya and in Iraq –
ISIS’s beheadings and kidnappings were spawned.

Cameron said he’d take “personal charge” of efforts to secure a victim’s release,
Namely that of David Cawthorne Haines,
And yet his efforts were as useless as the fairy-dust he once snorted,
Vapid promises that only added to the Haines’ family’s pain.

David Cameron would flatly refuse to pay ransoms
Making him more stiff-necked than King John
Who coughed up to save Richard the Lionheart
And wasn’t too proud to deal with Saladin.

The fruit of Cameron’s serving the stereotype of ‘Little Satan’,
The craven skivvy to America’s satanic Empire,
Was a fellow Brit being forced to kneel down in the desert
Bravely facing a crude instrument of terror.

“My name is David Cawthorne Haines,” said Haines
Dressed in an orange shift and threatened with a knife
“I would like to declare that I hold you David Cameron…”
Haines addressed the world, his child and his wife.

“I would like to declare that I hold you David Cameron…”
“Entirely responsible for my execution.”
Haines then accused the British Prime Minister of entering
“Voluntarily into a coalition

“With the United States against the Islamic State
“Just as your predecessor Tony Blair did
“Following a trend amongst our British Prime Minsters
“Who can’t find the courage to say no to the Americans.

“Unfortunately it is we the British public who will pay the price
“For our Parliament’s selfish decisions.”
When it was over his severed head was placed on his back
In the most gruesome and barbarous position.
“The only way to defeat IS is to stand firm” said Cameron,
Pompously adding “A country like ours will not be cowed”
Only to be cowed by the US Empire into helping cover yet more
Of the Middle East with the US war machine’s shroud.

A glimpse into the reality of the UK

Did you like this? Share it:

What F…..g Imbecile Wants Another War ???

Hello Dear Reader, back from a weeks retreat in the mountains of Turkey, thirteen classes of yoga in six days, ouch. I didn’t have to read a paper or watch the news to realise that another war would be declared as the so predictable answer to all the problems of the Middle East, what barbaric morons these war-mongerer’s are eh. What on earth do they think they are playing at ?

Climate change and the heavy taxes that will be incurred as a result of their concocted findings is a sham, I mean we can’t possibly produce a tiny fraction of the pollutants causing detrimental changes to the weather compared to the immeasurable, lethal damage of the fallout of hundreds of catastrophic bombs consisting of, deleted uranium and nano technology capable of melting the flesh from the bones of people unfortunate enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The contamination that these hideous weapons create into the atmosphere is positively evil and immoral, but they make so much money for the crazed rulers of planet earth. How can my fellow humans keep falling for the same ol’ crap time and time again ‘ makes me want to weep.
I’ve posted two articles from ‘Stop The War Coalition’ site please read them, love to you all, Janie, xxx

“The first people totalitarians destroy or silence are men of ideas and free minds.” Isiah Berlin 1909-1997

You couldn’t make it up: the terrorists we just finished training are now fighting us
Souad Mekhennet 20 September 2014. Posted in News
Rebels in Syria and Libya received training and support from US, French and British military and intelligence personnel — before they joined ISIS or the Al Nusra Front.


Isis parade
IN RECENT years, President Obama, his European friends, and even some Middle Eastern allies, have supported “rebel groups” in Libya and Syria. Some received training, financial and military support to overthrow Muammar Gadhafi and battle Bashar al Assad. It’s a strategy that follows the old saying, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend,” and it has been the American and allied approach for decades in deciding whether to support opposition groups and movements.

The problem is that it is completely unreliable — and often far worse than other strategies. Every year there are more cases in which this approach backfires. The most glaring and famous failure was in Afghanistan, where some of the groups taught (and supplied) to fight the Soviet Army later became stridently anti-Western. In that environment, Al Qaeda flourished and established the camps where perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were trained. Yet instead of learning from its mistakes, the United States keeps making them.

Washington and its allies empowered groups whose members had either begun with anti-American or anti-Western views or found themselves lured to those ideas in the process of fighting. According to interviews with members of militant groups, such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria’s Al Nusra Front (which is aligned with al Qaeda), that is exactly what happened with some of the fighters in Libya and even with factions of the Free Syrian Army.


“In the East of Syria, there is no Free Syrian Army any longer. All Free Syrian Army people [there] have joined the Islamic State,” says Abu Yusaf, a high-level security commander of the Islamic State, whom The Washington Post’s Anthony Faiola wrote about last week.

The Islamic State is the most successful group for now, controlling the main areas of Syrian oil and gas fields. It has also acquired large amounts of cash, gold (from banks in the areas they control) and weapons in its fight against the armies in Syria and Iraq. “When the Iraqi Army fled from Mosul and the other areas, they left behind all the good equipment the Americans had given them,” Abu Yusaf says.

“From IS to the Mahdi army you see groups that basically are not our friends but who became more powerful because we have handled the situations wrong,” says a senior US security official, who spoke under the condition of anonymity.

Some European and Arab intelligence officials also voiced their worries and frustration about what they call the mistakes the United States has made in handling the uprisings in Arab states.

“We had, in the early stages, information that radical groups had used the vacuum of the Arab Spring, and that some of the people the US and their allies had trained to fight for ‘democracy’ in Libya and Syria had a jihadist agenda — already or later, [when they] joined al Nusra or the Islamic State,” a senior Arab intelligence official said in a recent interview.

He said that often his US counterparts would say things like, “We know you are right, but our president in Washington and his advisers don’t believe that.” Those groups, say Western security officials, are threats not only in the Middle East, but also in the United States and Europe, where they have members and sympathizers.


The official’s account has been corroborated by members of the Islamic State in and outside the Middle East, including Abu Yusaf, the military commander. In several interviews conducted in the last two months, they described how the collapse of security during Arab Spring uprisings helped them recruit, regroup and use the Western strategy – to support and train groups that fight dictators — for their own benefits.

“There had [also] been … some British and Americans who had trained us during the Arab Spring times in Libya,” said a man who calls himself Abu Saleh and who only agreed to be interviewed if his real identity remained secret.

Abu Saleh, who is originally from a town close to Benghazi, said he and a group of other Libyans received training and support in their country from French, British, and American military and intelligence personnel — before they joined the Al Nusra Front or the Islamic State. Western and Arab military sources interviewed for this article, confirmed Abu Saleh’s account that “training” and “equipment” were given to rebels in Libya during the fight against the Gadhafi regime.

Abu Saleh left Libya in 2012 for Turkey and then crossed into Syria. “First I fought under what people call the ‘Free Syrian Army’ but then switched to Al Nusra. And I have already decided I will join the Islamic State when my wounds are healed,” the 28-year-old said from a hospital in Turkey, where he is receiving medical treatment. He had been injured during a battle with the Syrian Army, he said, and was brought to Turkey with false documents. “Some of the Syrian people who they trained have joined the Islamic State and others jabhat al Nusra,” he said, smiling. He added, “Sometimes I joke around and say that I am a fighter made by America.”

For a long time, Western and Arab states supported the Free Syrian Army not only with training but also with weapons and other materiel. The Islamic State commander, Abu Yusaf, added that members of the Free Syrian Army who had received training — from the United States, Turkey and Arab military officers at an American base in Southern Turkey — have now joined the Islamic State. “Now many of the FSA people who the West has trained are actually joining us,” he said, smiling.

These militants are preparing for the day that Western governments catch on. “We do know the US will go after the Islamic State at some stage, and we are ready for it. But they should not underestimate the answer they will get,” said an IS sympathizer in Europe who goes by the name Abu Farouk. He added that the “unconditional support” of the United States toward the government of outgoing premier Nuri al-Maliki, which he says has oppressed Iraqi Sunnis, and America’s “pampering Iran,” which is mainly Shia, made the Islamic State a more attractive alternative for some Sunnis who felt angry about double standards.

“Thanks to the Arab spring and the West fighting all these rulers for us, we had enough time to grow and recruit in the Middle East, Europe and the U.S,” Abu Farouk said. Then he paused for some seconds and smiled. “Actually, we should say, thank you, Mr. President.”

Source: Washington Post

ISIS: Do Obama and Cameron understand what they are getting us into?

John Taylor 23 September 2014. Posted in News
Given the US’s wretched track record, including support for Israel’s recent massacre of innocents in Gaza, why would anyone imagine yet another military intervention would succeed.

US targets ISIS in Syria

Given the US’s wretched track record in the Middle East, why would anyone here or abroad imagine yet another American military intervention would Given the US’s wretched track record in the Middle East, including support for Israel’s recent massacre of innocents in Gaza, why would anyone here or abroad imagine yet another American military intervention would succeed

When it comes to dropping bombs on Arabs, American newspapers and TV are usually extraordinarily supportive of whatever the Administration in power wants to do. Witness the pack mentality which led virtually every print journalist and editor in the country to endorse Colin Powell’s bogus UN speech blowing the whistle on Saddam’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction.

Thus it is surprising and perhaps encouraging that some of our traditional media outlets greeted Obama’s speech about attacking the Islamic State (IS), aka ISIS or ISIL, with more than a little skepticism. From the AP:”…Barack Obama is taking a huge risk. He is thrusting US fighting forces into a growing military operation with clear dangers, unknown costs, an indefinite length and unpredictable consequences.” And from The New York Times: “Some officials and terrorism experts believe that the actual danger posed by ISIS has been distorted in hours of television punditry and alarmist statements by politicians…”

Certainly the rhetoric of our Solons has been over the top. Democratic Senator Diane Feinstein claimed “The threat ISIS poses cannot be overstated” and that the Islamic State is “the most vicious, well-funded and militant terrorist organization we have ever seen.” Republican James Inhofe warned, “We’re in the most dangerous position we’ve ever been in as a nation” Somehow I thought the US was in greater danger when U-Boats were sinking tankers within sight of the Jersey shore, but perhaps people in Oklahoma, lacking an ocean, have a different perspective.


Add a couple of beheading videos to Congressional hyperbole and the White House quickly succumbed to war fever. Another major military intervention in the Middle East has begun, leading who knows where and at what cost. Forgotten are the Mujaheddin we sponsored in Afghanistan to fight Soviets who morphed into the Taliban and al-Qaeda. Down the memory hole is the destruction of the Libyan state, which Obama himself presided over, and the lawlessness and anarchy which prevail there now.

Obama’s televised speech outlining American “strategy” against the Islamic State was not reassuring in the least and ought to make us wonder whether the President understands the scope of the struggle he is getting us into. For Obama the Islamic State may be “a terrorist group, pure and simple,” but it is clearly much more than that having political as well as religious underpinnings. How else could a few thousand fighters control six or seven million people and vast swaths of Iraq and Syria? Despite what the Administration would have us believe, the Islamic State is an insurgency with popular backing from the Sunni inhabitants of Syria and northern Iraq. The Sunnis there are going to resist the re-imposition of non-Sunni rule from Damascus or Baghdad. Is this a struggle we really want to be involved in?

In Syria the Sunni population supports the Islamic State because they have been excluded from political power since the 1920s. The French colonial administration, installed as the Mandatory power by the League of Nations, fearing the power of the Sunnis, who then as now constituting a majority of Syrians, recruited the Syrian army and police from Alawite and Druze minorities. Since the departure of the French, Alawite military officers have held the supreme power in Syria. In Iraq, the Sunnis were the ruling class until Uncle Sam removed Saddam in 2003 and elections brought a Shia government to power who have been determined to marginalize Iraq’s Sunni population.

It is more than a little ironic, therefore, that by supporting Sunni insurgents fighting the Assad regime in Syria and by bringing Shia rule to Iraq, American intervention has been instrumental in creating the Islamic State and the mess Obama now seeks to remediate.

The President’s strategy for mobilizing political and military support within the region to defeat the Islamic State is wholly unconvincing and completely unrealistic. Although the American trained Iraqi Army vastly outnumbers IS fighters, the army abandoned the Sunni areas in northern and central Iraq without a fight, threw away their arms and legged it south to Baghdad and beyond. Subsequent Iraqi Army attempts to recapture Tikrit, just up the Tigris from Baghdad, ended in complete failure. The record of Kurdish forces versus the Islamic State’s insurgents is little better. Without the insertion of American ground forces, whose deployment to Iraq looks politically unacceptable, at least for the moment, it is hard to imagine how the IS insurgency will be defeated.

Even more unrealistic are US plans to build up the Free Syrian Army (FSA) as a counter weight to the IS. The FSA is Sunni and has the same objective as the Islamic State, ousting the Assad regime in Damascus. Although the Assad government is determinedly secular, its senior officials are Alawites, an off shoot of Shia Islam, making the government in Damascus an important target of the Sunni insurgency. The FSA and the IS are actually allies. American aid to the FSA in the past has unquestionable contributed to the success of the Islamic State and continued aid will likely continue to do so.

The Assad regime is a natural US ally, not an adversary, in the battle with the IS. And of all the forces in the region resisting the IS only the Syrian army has had any success. Another natural American ally is Iran which is overwhelmingly Shia and closely allied with the governments in Baghdad and Damascus. Iran also has significant military capacity and a long border with the Islamic State in northeastern Iraq. Both Syria and Iran are enemies of Israel. As a result, because the United States has chosen to make Israel’s enemies America’s enemies, domestic political considerations make it impossible for the US to ally itself with either Iran or Syria, as useful and sensible as those alliances would be.

Perhaps the most unrealistic and bizarre of all are the Obama Administration’s plans to make Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States and Turkey allies in the fight against the IS. The Turks have supported the Sunni insurgency against the Assad regime from the beginning. Turkey is a Sunni nation, with a moderate Islamic government. Could the Turkish government be convinced to abandon the Sunni insurgency in Syria? Doubtful. There are reports that the Turkish government has already told Uncle Sam that Turkish airfields will not be available to attack IS forces.

As for the conservatives Sunni Arab states in the Arabian Peninsula, their inhabitants have provided private financial support to the nascent Islamic State, channeled through Kuwait, for years. Their governments, with encouragement from the United States, are hostile to Iran. How could the Obama Administration imagine that these nations, who citizens regard all Shias with distain at best and fear Iran, would suddenly reverse course and help save Iran’s most important ally, the Shia government in Baghdad, from a Sunni insurgency?

Given the US’s wretched track record in the Middle East, including support for Israel’s recent massacre of innocents in Gaza, why would anyone here or abroad imagine yet another American military intervention would succeed when previous invasions, raids, bombing campaigns, occupations and economic sanctions have utterly failed?

The coming battle with Islamic State insurgents showcases American political immaturity, is emotionally driven and lacks a coherent political and military strategy. It is also unnecessary.

Source: UNZ

Protest 25 September: Don’t Bomb Iraq – Don’t Bomb Syria. Downing Street 5.30pm
The Alice in Wonderland absurdity of Obama’s policy for stopping ISIS in Syria
Sociopaths united: the West versus ISIS is a marriage made in hell
You couldn’t make it up: the terrorists we just finished training are now fighting us
The ISIS beheadings are Obama’s 9/11 as he takes up the mantle of George W Bush
Another western war won’t end terror in Iraq or Syria. It will only spread it
Why Barack Obama’s declaration of perpetual war against ISIS is illegal
The seed bed of ISIS was the west’s military intervention in Iraq
Russell Brand: Will Obama’s bombs stop the ISIS beheadings?
Will Obama-Cameron bombing campaign turn ISIS into an unstoppable monster?

ISIS: Do Obama and Cameron understand what they are getting us into?
The Alice in Wonderland absurdity of Obama’s policy for stopping ISIS in Syria
Sociopaths united: the West versus ISIS is a marriage made in hell
You couldn’t make it up: the terrorists we just finished training are now fighting us
The ISIS beheadings are Obama’s 9/11 as he takes up the mantle of George W Bush
Stop the War needs you
Cut war not welfareOur work for peace is funded entirely by donations from our supporters. How you can help »
Tony Blair Watch
What is UK’s top war criminal up to these days? »

Did you like this? Share it:

Futile, Ugly War

Hello Dear Reader, always music to my ears to hear of soldiers connecting with their soul, amazing, first article’s about Israeli soldiers refusing to bomb Gaza, also great article follows from one of the most honorable journalist alive today, John Pilger, it’s a bit lengthy but I’m away for a bit so won’t post again for over 10 days. But be sure to peruse past post’s in the meantime.

How can it ever be justified to go to war ? the killing of my fellow beings is so beyond my way of thinking, just can’t begin to comprehend the military mind, they just have to be so completely brainwashed to carry out such evil deeds…and for what ??? Their masters to inherit the wealth and resources of their latest murderous campaign ? and for them (the order followers) to return home without legs and arms ?

Spread your love my friends, there’s never been a more crucial time, love to you all, Janie, xxx

“Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism – how passionately I hate them !” Albert Einstein

A large number of Israeli reservists have refused to serve in the army in protest to the Israeli military’s persistent harassment of civilians across the occupied Palestinian territories.

“We, veterans of Unit 8200, reserve soldiers both past and present, declare that we refuse to take part in actions against Palestinians and refuse to continue serving as tools in deepening the military control over the Occupied Territories,” said the letter signed by more than 43 veterans of one of Israel’s most secretive military intelligence units –many of them still active reservists.

They said the army’s intelligence work in the occupied Palestinian territories harms the rights of millions of people, calling on all Israeli soldiers and citizens to be aware of Israeli aggressions against the Palestinians.

“[That] question is one of the messages that we feel it is very important to get across mostly to the Israeli public,” Israeli reservists said, adding, “That is a very common misconception about intelligence…. When we were enlisting in the military [we thought] our job is going to be minimizing violence, minimizing loss of lives, and that made the moral side of it feel much easier.”

Sources say the Israeli intelligence operations include targeted assassinations and intrusive surveillance of civilians.

The letter was initially written before the July War on the besieged Gaza Strip, but it was modified later as the death toll in the Gaza Strip jumped.

Nearly 2,140 Palestinians lost their lives and some 11,000 were injured in the brutal Israeli war on Gaza.

Share this:

The Danger of Nato

The Despicable Destruction of Gaza

Six steps to defeating ISIS without the US and Britain bombing Iraq or Syria
Phyllis Bennis 12 September 2014. Posted in News
Military attacks are wrong, illegal in international law, immoral because of civilian casualties, a distraction from diplomacy, and make real solutions impossible.


US jet over Syria and Iraq
President Obama is right: There is no military solution.

Military actions will not set the stage for political solutions; they will prevent those solutions from taking hold. Escalating military actions against this violent extremist organization is not going to work.

The bottom line is there is no immediate action that will make ISIS disappear, even if US airstrikes manage to get the right target somewhere and take out an APC or a truckload of guys with RPGs or whatever.

You can’t destroy an ideology — or even an organization —through bombing (look at the efforts to do so with Al Qaeda . . . lots of members killed in Afghanistan, but the organization took root in a bunch of other countries).

Arming the so-called “moderate” opposition in Syria doesn’t mean supporting the good guys. It means sending arms to the Free Syrian Army which, according to the New York Times, “went on to behead six ISIS fighters…and then posted the photographs on Facebook.”

A military strike might bring some immediate satisfaction, but we all know revenge is a bad basis for foreign policy, especially when it has such dangerous consequences.

As horrifying as the beheading of the two US journalists was, revenge is never a good basis for foreign policy. We should keep in mind that Matthew Olson, the outgoing head of the National Counterterrorism Center, said last week that “there is no credible information that [ISIS] is planning to attack the United States,” and there is “no indication at this point of a cell of foreign fighters operating in the United States – full stop.”

Instead, we have to recognize that military solutions really don’t work. Have we forgotten the failures of the US wars in the Middle East over these many years? We need to keep our focus on the medium- and long-term solutions, something not so easy to do in a political year.

We have to recognize that military attacks are not only wrong in a host of ways (illegal in international law, immoral because of civilian casualties, a distraction from vitally needed diplomacy) but also that those strikes are making real solutions impossible.

Why? We have to start by understanding just why ISIS is so powerful.

Why ISIS is so powerful

First, ISIS has good weapons (mostly US and Saudi weapons that have flooded the region for more than 15 years). So we need to start thinking about the need for an arms embargo on all sides.

Second, ISIS has good military leadership, some of it provided by Sunni Iraqi generals who were kicked out of their positions in the military when the US invaded and who are now providing training, strategy and military leadership to ISIS-allied militias and ISIS itself. These guys are a very secular bunch. They drink and smoke, and they will be unlikely to stick around ISIS if they believe they have any chance of recovering their lost jobs, prestige, and dignity. That could happen over time, but only if a really new government takes hold in Iraq, but it’s not going to be enough to simply choose a new prime minister and announce a new government made up of too many of the same old sectarian faces.

Third, ISIS has support from Sunni tribal leaders – the very people President Obama says he wants to “persuade” to break with ISIS. But these are people who have suffered grievously – first during the US invasion, and especially in the years of the US-backed Shi’a-controlled sectarian government of Nuri al-Maliki. They were demonized, attacked, and dispossessed by the government in Baghdad, and many of them thus see ISIS at the moment as the only force they can ally with to challenge that government. And many of them control large and powerful militias now fighting alongside ISIS against the government in Baghdad.

Fourth, ISIS has support from ordinary Iraqi Sunnis, who (also largely secular) may hate what ISIS stands for, its extremism and violence, but who have suffered terribly under Maliki’s sectarian Shi’a-controlled government from arrests, torture, extra-judicial executions, and more. As a result they also are willing to ally with ISIS against Baghdad, at least for now.

So, weakening ISIS requires ending the support it relies on from tribal leaders, military figures, and ordinary Iraqi Sunnis. The key question is how do we do that?

Defeating ISIS without bombing Iraq or Syria

Step One: Stop the airstrikes. Because what we in the US see as “hooray, we got the bad guys” is seen by many in Iraq, especially the very Sunnis the president wants to persuade to break with ISIS, as the US acting as the air force for the Kurds and the Shi’a against the Sunnis. Thus the airstrikes defeat the important goal of ending popular support for ISIS, and instead actually serve to strengthen the extremist organization.

Step Two: Make real the commitment for “No boots on the ground.” In announcements during just the last few weeks, the White House has acknowledged sending close to 1,300 pairs of boots to the ground in Iraq. And who knows how many unacknowledged pairs of CIA and JSOC (special operations forces) sneakers may already be in Iraq? We need a call to “Stop the Slippery Slide Towards Even More Boots on the Ground!” The US must also stop flooding the region with arms that only result in more violence against civilians, and end its policy of ignoring the violations of human rights and international law committed by its allies. We need enforcement of the Leahy Law (that prohibits assistance to foreign military units known to violate human rights) here at home.

Step Three: Organize a real diplomatic partnership to deal with ISIS. Even though the US is carrying out airstrikes and deploying new troops in Iraq, everyone agrees there is no military solution. So diplomacy must have center stage. That means serious engagement with Iran, among other players. Tehran has more influence in Baghdad than Washington does. If we are serious about wanting to encourage the Iraqi government to accept a truly more inclusive approach, joint pressure from the US and Iran holds the best chance. Even though Iran is predominantly Shi’a itself, the country’s leaders are very worried about the instability in their next-door neighbor resulting from the years of Shi’a sectarianism in Baghdad. The US-Iran nuclear talks appear to be moving very well; this is the moment to broaden those talks to include discussion of a real “grand bargain” between the US and Iran, to include all the regional crises.

Step Four: Initiate a new search for broader diplomatic solutions in the United Nations. That means working to build a real coalition aimed at using diplomatic and financial pressures, not military strikes, at the international level in both Iraq and Syria. All the regional governments have their own concerns. Turkey, for instance, knows that joining a US-led military assault on Iraq could threaten the lives of its 49 diplomats and their families now held by ISIS. A real coalition is needed not for military strikes but for powerful diplomacy. That means pressuring US ally Saudi Arabia to stop arming and financing ISIS and other extremist fighters; pressuring US ally Turkey to stop allowing ISIS and other fighters to cross into Syria over the Turkish border; pressuring US allies Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others to stop financing and arming everyone and anyone in Syria who says they’re against Assad. We don’t need another Coalition of the Killing (see Step One for why). Why not work to make it a Coalition of the Rebuilding?

Step Five: Push the UN, despite Lakhdar Brahimi’s resignation, to restart real negotiations on ending the civil war in Syria. That means everyone involved needs to be at the table: the Syrian regime; civil society inside Syria including non-violent activists, women, young people, refugees, etc.; the armed rebels; the external opposition; the regional and global players supporting all sides – the US, Russia, Iran, Saudi, the UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, and beyond. This could provide a moment to work with Russia on Syria policy, thus building on the successful joint effort to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons and perhaps lessening tensions over Ukraine. An arms embargo on all side should be on the long-term agenda.

Step Six: Massively increase US humanitarian contributions to UN agencies for the now millions of refugees and IDPs in and from both Syria and Iraq. The US has pledged significant funds, but much of it has not actually been made available to the agencies, and more should be pledged and given.?

Source: The Progressive


John Pilger: Breaking the last taboo – Gaza and the threat of world war in Ukraine
John Pilger 11 September 2014. Posted in News
The attack on Gaza was an attack on all of us. The siege of Gaza is a siege of all of us. Denial of justice to Palestinians is a symptom of much of humanity under siege.

Media blindfolded
“There is a taboo,” said the visionary Edward Said, “on telling the truth about Palestine and the great destructive force behind Israel. Only when this truth is out can any of us be free.”

For many people, the truth is out now. At last, they know. Those once intimidated into silence can’t look away now.

Staring at them from their TV, laptop, phone, is proof of the barbarism of the Israeli state and the great destructive force of its mentor and provider, the United States, the cowardice of European governments, and the collusion of others, such as Canada and Australian, in this epic crime.

The attack on Gaza was an attack on all of us. The siege of Gaza is a siege of all of us. The denial of justice to Palestinians is a symptom of much of humanity under siege and a warning that the threat of a new world war is growing by the day.

When Nelson Mandela called the struggle of Palestine “the greatest moral issue of our time”, he spoke on behalf of true civilisation, not that which empires invent.

In Latin America, the governments of Brazil, Chile, Venezuela, Bolivia, El Salvador, Peru and Ecuador have made their stand on Gaza. Each of these countries has known its own dark silence when immunity for mass murder was sponsored by the same godfather in Washington that answered the cries of children in Gaza with more ammunition to kill them.

Unlike Netanyahu and his killers, Washington’s pet fascists in Latin America didn’t concern themselves with moral window dressing. They simply murdered, and left the bodies on rubbish dumps.

For Zionism, the goal is the same: to dispossess and ultimately destroy an entire human society: a truth that 225 Holocaust survivors and their descendants have compared with the genesis of genocide.

Nothing has changed since the Zionists’ infamous “Plan D” in 1948 that ethnically cleansed an entire people. Recently, on the website of the Times of Israel were the words: “Genocide is Permissible”.

A deputy speaker of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, Moshe Feiglin, demands a policy of mass expulsion into concentration camps. An MP, Ayelet Shaked, whose party is a member of the governing coalition, calls for the extermination of Palestinian mothers to prevent them giving birth to what she calls “little snakes”.

For years, reporters have watched Israeli soldiers bait Palestinian children by abusing them through loud-speakers. Then they shoot them dead. For years, reporters have known about Palestinian women about to give birth and refused passage through a roadblock to a hospital; and the baby has died, and sometimes the mother.

For years, reporters have known about Palestinian doctors and ambulance crews given permission by Israeli commanders to attend the wounded or remove the dead, only to be shot through the head.

For years, reporters have known about stricken people prevented from getting life-saving treatment, or shot dead when they’ve tried to reach a clinic for chemotherapy treatment. One elderly lady with a walking stick was murdered in this way – a bullet in her back.

When I put the facts of this crime to Dori Gold, a senior adviser to the Israeli prime minister, he said, “Unfortunately in every kind of warfare there are cases of civilians who are accidentally killed. But the case you cite was not terrorism. Terrorism means putting the cross-hairs of the sniper’s rifle on a civilian deliberately.”

I replied, “That’s exactly what happened.”

“No,” he said, “it did not happen.”

Such a lie or delusion is repeated unerringly by Israel’s apologists. As the former New York Times reporter Chris Hedges points out, the reporting of such an atrocity invariably ends up as “caught in the cross-fire”. For as long as I have covered the Middle East, much if not most of the western media has colluded in this way.

In one of my films, a Palestinian cameraman, Imad Ghanem, lies helpless while soldiers from the “most moral army in the world” blew both his legs off. This atrocity was given two lines on the BBC website. Thirteen journalists were killed by Israel in its latest bloodfest in Gaza. All were Palestinian. Who knows their names?

Something is different now. There is a huge revulsion across the world; and the voices of sensible liberalism are worried. Their hand wringing and specious choir of “equal blame” and “Israel’s right to defend itself” will not wash any more; neither will the smear of anti-Semitism. Neither will their selective cry that “something must be done” about Islamic fanatics but nothing must be done about Zionist fanatics.

One sensible liberal voice, the novelist Ian McEwan, was being celebrated as a sage by the Guardian while the children of Gaza were blown to bits. This is the same Ian McEwan who ignored the pleading of Palestinians not to accept the Jerusalem Prize for literature. “If I only went to countries that I approve of, I probably would never get out of bed,” said McEwan.

If they could speak, the dead of Gaza might say: Stay in bed, great novelist, for your very presence smoothes the bed of racism, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and murder – no matter the weasel words you uttered as you claimed your prize.

Understanding the sophistry and power of liberal propaganda is key to understanding why Israel’s outrages endure; why the world looks on; why sanctions are never applied to Israel; and why nothing less than a total boycott of everything Israeli is now a measure of basic human decency.

The most incessant propaganda says Hamas is committed to the destruction of Israel. Khaled Hroub, the Cambridge University scholar considered a world leading authority on Hamas, says this phrase is “never used or adopted by Hamas, even in its most radical statements”. The oft-quoted “anti-Jewish” 1988 Charter was the work of “one individual and made public without appropriate Hamas consensus… The author was one of the ‘old guard’ “; the document is regarded as an embarrassment and never cited.

Hamas has repeatedly offered a 10-year truce with Israel and has long settled for a two-state solution. When Medea Benjamin, the fearless Jewish American activist, was in Gaza, she carried a letter from Hamas leaders to President Obama that made clear the government of Gaza wanted peace with Israel. It was ignored. I personally know of many such letters carried in good faith, ignored or dismissed.

The unforgivable crime of Hamas is a distinction almost never reported: it is the only Arab government to have been freely and democratically elected by its people. Worse, it has now formed a government of unity with the Palestinian Authority. A single, resolute Palestinian voice – in the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council and the International Criminal Court – is the most feared threat.

Since 2002, a pioneering media unit at Glasgow University has produced remarkable studies of reporting and propaganda in Israel/Palestine. Professor Greg Philo and his colleagues were shocked to find a public ignorance compounded by TV news reporting. The more people watched, the less they knew.

Greg Philo says the problem is not “bias” as such. Reporters and producers are as moved as anyone by the suffering of Palestinians; but so imposing is the power structure of the media as an extension of the state and its vested interests – that critical facts and historical context are routinely suppressed.

Incredibly, less than nine per cent of young viewers interviewed by Professor Philo’s team were aware that Israel was the occupying power, and that the illegal settlers were Jewish; many believed them to be Palestinian. The term “Occupied Territories” was seldom explained. Words such as “murder”, “atrocity”, “cold-blooded killing” were used only to describe the deaths of Israelis.

Recently, a BBC reporter, David Loyn, was critical of another British journalist, Jon Snow of Channel 4 News. Snow was so moved by what he had seen in Gaza he went on YouTube to make a humanitarian appeal. What concerned the BBC man was that Snow had breached protocol and been emotional in his YouTube piece.

“Emotion,” wrote Loyn, “is the stuff of propaganda and news is against propaganda”. Did he write this with a straight face? In fact, Snow’s delivery was calm. His crime was to have strayed outside the boundaries of fake impartiality. Unforgivably, he didn’t censor himself.

In 1937, with Adolf Hitler in power, Geoffrey Dawson, editor of The Times in London, wrote the following in his diary: “I spend my nights in taking out anything which will hurt [German] susceptibilities and in dropping in little things which are intended to soothe them.”

On 30 July, the BBC offered viewers a masterclass in the Dawson Principle. The diplomatic correspondent of the programme Newsnight, Mark Urban, gave five reasons why the Middle East was in turmoil. None included the historic or contemporary role of the British government. The Cameron government’s dispatch of £8 billion worth of arms and military equipment to Israel was airbrushed. Britain’s massive arms shipment to Saudi Arabia was airbrushed. Britain’s role in the destruction of Libya was airbrushed. Britain’s support for the tyranny in Egypt was airbrushed.

As for the British invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, they didn’t happen, either.

The only expert witness on this BBC programme was an academic called Toby Dodge from the London School of Economics. What viewers needed to know was that Dodge had been a special adviser to David Petraeus, the American general largely responsible for the disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan. But this, too, was airbrushed.

In matters of war and peace, BBC-style illusions of impartiality and credibility do more to limit and control public discussion than tabloid distortion. As Greg Philo pointed out, Jon Snow’s moving commentary on YouTube was limited to whether the Israeli assault on Gaza was proportionate or reasonable. What was missing – and is almost always missing – was the essential truth of the longest military occupation in modern times: a criminal enterprise backed by western governments from Washington to London to Canberra.

As for the myth that “vulnerable” and “isolated” Israel is surrounded by enemies, Israel is actually surrounded by strategic allies. The Palestinian Authority, bankrolled, armed and directed by the US, has long colluded with Tel Aviv. Standing shoulder to shoulder with Netanyahu are the tyrannies in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar – if the World Cup ever gets to Qatar, count on Mossad to run the security.

Resistance is humanity at its bravest and most noble. The resistance in Gaza is rightly compared with the 1943 Jewish uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto – which also dug tunnels and deployed tactics of subterfuge and surprise against an overpowering military machine. The last surviving leader of the Warsaw uprising, Marek Edelman, wrote a letter of solidarity to the Palestinian resistance, comparing it with the ZOB, his ghetto fighters. The letter began: “Commanders of the Palestine military, paramilitary and partisan operations – and to all soldiers [of Palestine].”

Dr. Mads Gilbert is a Norwegian doctor renowned for his heroic work in Gaza. On 8 August, Dr. Gilbert returned to his hometown, Tromso in Norway which, as he pointed out, the Nazis had occupied for seven years. He said, “Imagine being back in 1945 and we in Norway did not win the liberation struggle, did not throw out the occupier. Imagine the occupier remaining in our country, taking it piece by piece, for decades upon decades, and banishing us to the leanest areas, and taking the fish in the sea and the water beneath us, then bombing our hospitals, our ambulance workers, our schools, our homes.

“Would we have given up and waved the white flag? No, we would not! And this is the situation in Gaza. This is not a battle between terrorism and democracy. Hamas is not the enemy Israel is fighting. Israel is waging a war against the Palestinian people’s will to resist. It is the Palestinian people’s dignity that they will not accept this.

“In 1938, the Nazis called the Jews Untermenschen – subhuman. Today, Palestinians are treated as a subhuman people who can be slaughtered without any in power reacting.

“So I have returned to Norway, a free country, and this country is free because we had a resistance movement, because occupied nations have the right to resist, even with weapons – it’s stated in international law. And the Palestinian people’s resistance in Gaza is admirable: a struggle for us all.”

There are dangers in telling this truth, in breaching what Edward Said called “the last taboo”. My documentary, Palestine Is Still the Issue, was nominated for a Bafta, a British academy award, and praised by the Independent Television Commission for its “journalistic integrity” and the “care and thoroughness with which it was researched.”

Yet, within minutes of the film’s broadcast on Britain’s ITV Network, a shock wave struck – a deluge of emails described me as a “demonic psychopath”, “a purveyor of hate and evil”, “an anti-Semite of the most dangerous kind”. Much of this was orchestrated by Zionists in the US who could not possibly have seen the film. Death threats arrived at a rate of one a day.

Something similar happened to the Australian commentator Mike Carlton last month. In his regular column in the Sydney Morning Herald, Carlton produced a rare piece of journalism about Israel and the Palestinians; he identified the oppressors and their victims. He was careful to limit his attack to “a new and brutal Israel dominated by the hard-line, right-wing Likud party of Netanyahu”. Those who had previously run the Zionist state, he implied, belonged to “a proud liberal tradition”.

On cue, the deluge struck. He was called “a bag of Nazi slime, a Jew-hating racist.” He was threatened repeatedly, and he emailed his attackers to “get fucked”. The Herald demanded he apologise. When he refused, he was suspended, then he resigned. According to the Herald’s publisher, Sean Aylmer, the company “expects much higher standards from its columnists.”

The “problem” of Carlton’s acerbic, often solitary liberal voice in a country in which Rupert Murdoch controls 70 per cent of the capital city press – Australia is the world’s first murdocracy – would be solved twice over. The Australian Human Rights Commission is to investigate complaints against Carlton under the Racial Discrimination Act, which outlaws any public act or utterance that is “reasonably likely… to offend, insult, humiliate another person or a group of people” on the basic of their race, colour or national or ethnic origin.

In contrast to safe, silent Australia – where the Carltons are made extinct – real journalism is alive in Gaza. I often speak on the phone with Mohammed Omer, an extraordinary young Palestinian journalist, to whom I presented, in 2008, the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. Whenever I called him during the assault on Gaza, I could hear the whine of drones, the explosion of missiles. He interrupted one call to attend to children huddled outside waiting for transport amidst the explosions. When I spoke to him on 30 July, a single Israeli F-19 fighter had just slaughtered 19 children. On 20 August, he described how Israeli drones had effectively “rounded up” a village so that they could savagely gunned down.

Every day, at sunrise, Mohammed looks for families who have been bombed. He records their stories, standing in the rubble of their homes; he takes their pictures. He goes to the hospital. He goes to the morgue. He goes to the cemetery. He queues for hours for bread for his own family. And he watches the sky. He sends two, three, four dispatches a day. This is real journalism.

“They are trying to annihilate us,” he told me. “But the more they bomb us, the stronger we are. They will never win.”

The great crime committed in Gaza is a reminder of something wider and menacing to us all.

Since 2001, the United States and its allies have been on a rampage. In Iraq, at least 700,000 men, woman and children are dead as a result. The rise of jihadists – in a country where there was none – is the result.

Known as al-Qaeda and now the Islamic State, modern jihadism was invented by US and Britain, assisted by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The original aim was to use and develop an Islamic fundamentalism that had barely existed in much of the Arab world in order to undermine pan-Arab movements and secular governments.

By the 1980s, this had become a weapon to destroy the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. The CIA called it Operation Cyclone; and a cyclone it turned out to be, with its unleashed fury blowing back in the faces of its creators.

The attacks of 9/11 and in London in July, 2005 were the result of this blowback, as were the recent, gruesome murders of the American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff. For more than a year, the Obama administration armed the killers of these two young men – then known as ISIS in Syria – in order to destroy the secular government in Damascus.

The West’s principal “ally” in this imperial mayhem is the medieval state where beheadings are routinely and judicially carried out – Saudi Arabia. Whenever a member of the British Royal Family is sent to this barbaric place, you can bet your bottom petrodollar that the British government wants to sell the sheiks more fighter planes, missiles, manacles. Most of the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, which bankrolls jihadists from Syria to Iraq.

Why must we live in this state of perpetual war?

The immediate answer lies in the United States, where a secret and unreported coup has taken place. A group known as the Project for a New American Century, the inspiration of Dick Cheney and others, came to power with the administration of George W Bush. Once known in Washington as the “crazies”, this extreme sect believes in what the US Space Command calls “full spectrum dominance”.

Under both Bush and Obama, a19th-century imperial mentality has infused all departments of state. Raw militarism is ascendant; diplomacy is redundant. Nations and governments are judged as useful or expendable: to be bribed or threatened or “sanctioned”.

On 31 July, the National Defense Panel in Washington published a remarkable document that called for the United States to prepare to fight six major wars simultaneously. At the top of the list were Russia and China – nuclear powers.

In one sense, a war against Russia has already begun. While the world watched horrified as Israel assaulted Gaza, similar atrocities in eastern Ukraine were barely news.

At the time of writing, two Ukrainian cities of Russian-speaking people – Donetsk and Luhansk – are under siege: their people and hospitals and schools blitzed by a regime in Kiev that came to power in a putsch led by neo-Nazis backed and paid for by the United States.

The coup was the climax of what the Russian political observer Sergei Glaziev describes as a 20-year “grooming of Ukrainian Nazis aimed at Russia”. Actual fascism has risen again in Europe and not one European leader has spoken against it, perhaps because the rise of fascism across Europe is now a truth that dares not speak its name.

With its fascist past, and present, Ukraine is now a CIA theme park, a colony of Nato and the International Monetary Fund. The fascist coup in Kiev in February was the boast of US assistant secretary of state Victoria Nuland, whose “coup budget” ran to $5 billion.

But there was a setback. Moscow prevented the seizure of its legitimate Black Sea naval base in Russian-speaking Crimea. A referendum and annexation quickly followed. Represented in the West as the Kremlin’s “aggression”, this serves to turn truth on its head and cover Washington’s goals: to drive a wedge between a “pariah” Russia and its principal trading partners in Europe and eventually to break up the Russian Federation. American missiles already surround Russia; Nato’s military build-up in the former Soviet republics and eastern Europe is the biggest since the second world war.

During the cold war, this would have risked a nuclear holocaust. The risk has returned as anti-Russian misinformation reaches crescendos of hysteria in the US and Europe. A textbook case is the shooting down of a Malaysian airliner in July. Without a single piece of evidence, the US and its Nato allies and their media machines blamed ethnic Russian “separatists” in Ukraine and implied that Moscow was ultimately responsible. An editorial in The Economist accused Vladimir Putin of mass murder. The cover of Der Spiegel used faces of the victims and bold red type, “Stoppt Putin Jetzt!” (Stop Putin Now!) In the New York Times, Timothy Garton Ash substantiated his case for “Putin’s deadly doctrine” with personal abuse of “a short, thickset man with a rather ratlike face”.

The Guardian’s role has been important. Renowned for its investigations, the newspaper has made no serious attempt to examine who shot the aeroplane down and why, even though a wealth of material from credible sources shows that Moscow was as shocked as the rest of the world, and the airliner may well have been brought down by the Ukrainian regime.

With the White House offering no verifiable evidence – even though US satellites would have observed the shooting-down – the Guardian’s Moscow correspondent Shaun Walker stepped into the breach. “My audience with the Demon of Donetsk,” was the front-page headline over Walker’s breathless interview with one Igor Bezler. “With a walrus moustache, a fiery temper and a reputation for brutality,” he wrote, “Igor Bezler is the most feared of all the rebel leaders in eastern Ukraine… nicknamed The Demon… If the Ukrainian security services, the SBU, are to be believed, the Demon and a group of his men were responsible for shooting down Malaysia Airlines flight MH17… as well as allegedly bringing down MH17, the rebels have shot down 10 Ukrainian aircraft.” Demon Journalism requires no further evidence.

Demon Journalism makes over a fascist-contaminated junta that seized power in Kiev as a respectable “interim government”. Neo-Nazis become mere “nationalists”. “News” sourced to the Kiev junta ensures the suppression of a US-run coup and the junta’s systematic ethnic cleaning of the Russian-speaking population of eastern Ukraine. That this should happen in the borderland through which the original Nazis invaded Russia, extinguishing some 22 Russian lives, is of no interest.

What matters is a Russian “invasion” of Ukraine that seems difficult to prove beyond familiar satellite images that evoke Colin Powell’s fictional presentation to the United Nations “proving” that Saddam Hussein had WMD. “You need to know that accusations of a major Russian ‘invasion’ of Ukraine appear not to be supported by reliable intelligence,” wrote a group of former senior US intelligence officials and analysts, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, to German Chancellor Angela Merkel. “Rather, the ‘intelligence’ seems to be of the same dubious, politically ‘fixed’ kind used 12 years ago to ‘justify’ the U.S.-led attack on Iraq.”

The jargon is “controlling the narrative”. In his seminal Culture and Imperialism, Edward Said was more explicit: the western media machine was now capable of penetrating deep into the consciousness of much of humanity with a “wiring” as influential as that of the imperial navies of the 19th century. Gunboat journalism, in other words. Or war by media.

Yet, a critical public intelligence and resistance to propaganda does exist; and a second superpower is emerging – the power of public opinion, fuelled by the internet and social media.

The false reality created by false news delivered by media gatekeepers may prevent some of us knowing that this new superpower is stirring in country after country: from the Americas to Europe, Asia to Africa. It is a moral insurrection, exemplified by the whistleblowers Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange. The question begs: will we break our silence while there is time?

When I was last in Gaza, driving back to the Israeli checkpoint, I caught sight of two Palestinian flags through the razor wire. Children had made flagpoles out of sticks tied together and they’d climbed on a wall and held the flag between them.

The children do this, I was told, whenever there are foreigners around, because they want to show the world they are there – alive, and brave, and undefeated.


Did you like this? Share it:

Nurses – Lost Faith in Vaccines

Hello Dear Reader,’ came across this news on philosophersstoneviewsfromtheboat site.
To vaccinate your precious child or not is such a significant decision for most parents and a scary one as we all want to provide the absolute best for them. So this article is somewhat concerning because those at the forefront of administrating these abominable concoctions are themselves doubting the validity of their health claims.

If you are familiar with my posts you’ll know that I am extremely concerned about the ongoing wars, instigated by the Western world, occuring as I write, and indeed the numerous wrongs inflicted upon the poorer members of the human race by those in power, but…but, vaccines play a major part in the elite’s plan to eradicate as many of us as possible from the face of the earth, and to add insult to injury, make as much money from our misery and sickness in the process ! Can you believe their audacity ?

But at last people are stirring from their apathy and are seeing through the very thick veil of corruption and deceit that has enveloped mankind for eons, hallelujah !

In the UK we have been inundated with every detail of the referendum for Scotland to decide whether to vote for independence from us. I’m ashamed to say that because of such media saturation of this historical event my mind has switched off from it, ‘driving me mad. I also wonder if it is another ‘divide and rule’ scenario being deliberately manipulated to render us weaker, as apart we are easier to control. Just a thought.

Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“We have no real proof of the boasted effectiveness of any form of anti-toxin or vaccine or serum….If such a vaccinated or immunised person contracts the disease which he is supposed to be protected, it is pretty good evidence that such ‘protection’ is valueless, isn’t it ? Surely people do contract disease against which they are supposed to be immunised, as we all know…Well, are you satisfied that WE ARE QUACKS ? In the eyes of those who are willing to forget the present prestige of medicine, such as it is, with all its dignity, its scientific jargon, its pratings of altruism, its great endowment, its well heralded “achievements,” we most assurededly are quacks, professing to do things we cannot do, and yes, taking money under this pretence.” Dr Paul M. Koonin, D.D.Sc.

One Third of Nurses Are Leaving Their Jobs and Losing Faith in Vaccines


It’s not just anti-vaccine parents and groups on the internet that are shutting down vaccination. Many doctors, nurses and other health professionals are coming around and grasping the gravity of how vaccines are damaging our bodies. Turnover of nurses (RNs) are now at record highs, with more than one-third leaving their jobs within the first two years and trust in health authorities and vaccination is at an all time low.

A study in the current issue of Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice reveals that an estimated 17.5 percent of newly-licensed RNs leave their first nursing job within the first year and one in three (33.5%) leave within two years. The authors point out many of the problems with existing turnover numbers in the literature, but many nurses are simply unhappy and growing numbers are resisting vaccinations themselves which is presenting problems in enforced environments where it is mandatory to be vaccinated.

A study in Vaccine titled “What lied behind the low rates of vaccinations among nurses who treat infants?” is evidence of a growing resistance to vaccinating infants in the developed world.

What is unfortunate is that although many of these nurses refuse the vaccinations themselves, they proceed to administer these poisons to infants to protect their employment. That is quite cowardly, contradictory and at the very least shameful, not only as a health practitioner, but as a human being.

Other problems relate to more nurses being pressured by doctors to mislead parents into a false sense of security while attempting to address and convince anti-vaccine parents that their misconceptions about vaccinations are based on myths.

Lack of Trust in Health Authorities

The majority of nurses in focus groups have expressed, to varying
degrees, lack of trust in the health authorities regarding their
recommendation to be vaccinated.

Nurses have expressed their frustration with health administrations
and have complained of the treatment they have received from that had no respect for them as individuals.
Nurses have expressed strong feelings against Ministries of Health in many nations for the expectation to be vaccinated. They do not want to be told what to do and want to make the decision themselves.

Comments regarding influenza:

“…if I want to, I will get the vaccine, I am a grownup, I am
responsible, if I want I will get vaccinated, it will not help whatever
he says (the MD).”


Within this conflict between self and profession they wanted to
be given the opportunity to decide for themselves if to get vaccinated.

They knew they had to work by “the book” regarding the
infants they treat. However, they do not accept the recommendations
blindly for themselves.

“…the line runs between me giving vaccines and receiving vaccines,
I can personally be against vaccinations but am not against
the national policy regarding vaccines, whoever wants can get

“I don’t want anybody to make me get immunized, I do not want
to, even if it is mandatory, even if it is pertussis, I don’t want to
get it.”

Most nurses do not see themselves as role models and do
not think they should reveal their personal behaviors or beliefs to
patients who ask them about themselves. However, some nurses
find their decision not to be vaccinated problematic and debates
between nurses started in all focus groups.

“What I do as a person and my beliefs are not relevant at all as
a professional.”

At many hospitals, flu shots are now mandatory for anyone who regularly enters the hospital including all medical staff, paid employees, students, vendors and volunteers. Many nurses are being faced with a choice to either get a flu shot or lose their job.

Fear of Side Effects

Nurses have reported on their experiences of side effects of vaccines.
They feel that the risk of contracting the diseases and the severity are not worth the risk of being injected with a vaccine that was not in use long enough to know what the side effects are. This is directed towards both influenza and pertussis vaccines, and they feel authorities are using them as guinea pigs.

More doctors are not using the Hib vaccine on their own children. Their reasons for declining the use of Hib for their own children included a lack of concern about the disease and the desire to reduce vaccines to a minimum.

Similarly almost a growing number of physicians are not using the MMR on their own children to avoid the trivalent combined vaccines because of safety concerns, the preference for infection-driven rather than vaccine-induced immunity, and the conviction that specific non-medical treatments allow a benign outcome of measles, mumps, and rubella. More nonpediatricians are delaying the initiation of DTaP vaccination beyond 6 months. 15 percent nonpediatricians would not give the first dose of measles or MMR before 2 years of age. These choices for physicians’ own families seem to reflect the same concerns as those of other educated health care consumers.

Growing Numbers of Anti-Vaccine-Friendly Doctors

Most doctors kick patients out of their practice for not vaccinating, or for asking too many questions. But there are now many who will do their best to provide you with vaccine advice and/or alternative schedules. There are now so many parents looking for these types of doctors that they have been inundated with phone calls from parents who want to seek advice on alternatives to vaccination. Dr. Sears hosts one such list on his website and divides them by state. List of vaccine-friendly doctors
The Tides are Turning And The Vaccination Game Will End

The antivaccinationist ideals the nurses expressed are an indication of the resistance within medical circles. Emotions and attitudes such as fear of the vaccines and mistrust in the health authorities and leading factors in lower compliance rates.

These attitudes and emotions may influence their actions toward other vaccines in the future. Eventually physicians and medical students themselves will begin to question vaccine wisdom. The house of cards is crumbling and the vaccination hoax health authorities have promoted to the population is being exposed.

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.
3 Vaccines That Should Be Banned And Never Administered To Any Child

Did you like this? Share it:

Data on Serious Hospital Errors To Be Withheld From the Public

Hello Dear Reader, great information here from one of my favourite doctors, Dr mercola, although it pertains to the US, it may just as well be addressing the state of the NHS here in the UK. Quite unbelievable that so many people exist that are totally unaware or incapable of knowing what a magnificent body they occupy and that their health really is within their own control.

There’s never been more urgency to get your act together concerning your health than now. Never before has the human body been exposed to hundreds of toxic chemicals daily, through the food chain, by way of chemtrails, through vaccinations, through the very detrimental energy of ‘fear’, from man-made electromagnetic currents and on it goes, this exhaustive onslaught on the wonderful, cosmically ordained body of ours from the dark forces that presently rule over our planet.

The simple truth is that the magnificent power of our thoughts can deflect this malevolent bombardment, if we choose to act upon our heartfelt thoughts as opposed to reacting fearfully to the extremely negative media propoganda blasted at us from all directions, then no matter how evil ‘their’intent, we will most surely prove more than a match to be reckoned with.

As we’re on the subject of health I’ve included more on the pernicious, aquisitive, despicable ‘Monsanto’, creator of the horrendous Genetically Modified Seed. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“It was a clever plan by biotech companies to increase food production under the pretext of saving the world from hunger. In reality, it was intended to make biotech companies filthy rich, to own the world. Today it’s the giant Monsanto corporation that controls 90% of all the genetically engineered products world wide. Genetically Modified (GM) products are planted, sold and eaten all over the world, without, lots of the time, the public being aware of what they are consuming.” Siv O’Neal 2008

shop (D)

Medical Errors Major Cause of Death
Data on Serious Hospital Errors Will Now Be Withheld from the Public

By Dr. Mercola

Harm and death caused by medical errors are a huge problem, and a major reason why the current, fatally flawed medical paradigm is in such desperate need of transformation.

Preventable medical mistakes are actually the third leading cause of death in the US, right after heart disease and cancer, claiming the lives of 210,000 Americans each year.

When you add in diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines, the number skyrockets to an estimated 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.

According to the most recent estimates published last year,1 preventable medical mistakes account for about one-sixth of all deaths that occur in the US annually. This is more than 4.5 times higher than 1999 estimates.2

When you consider instances where medical errors cause some form of harm but not necessarily death, the incidence rate may be as high as 40,000 per day!3

As a general rule, staying out of the hospital is one of your best ways to prevent dying unnecessarily, and this is one of the reasons why I’m so passionate about sharing preventive health strategies with you — tips like eating right, exercising, and reducing stress.

Exceptions would naturally include cases of accidental trauma or surgical emergencies. This is where modern medicine can be truly lifesaving.

Did you like this? Share it:

The Lunatics in Charge of The Asylum – Leuren Moret: The International Alliance for Depopulation

Hello dear Reader, I have so much respect for the whistleblowers of these demonic times. The following interview brings together all that we’ve learned so far about the elite’s plan for our demise. Leuren Moret is a geo-engineer scientist who decided to serve humanity by sharing her profound inside knowledge of what these nutter’s are capable of and how far they have got with their mind blowing technology and use of HAARP weaponry in bringing about the depopulation of the human race. Quite scary but we have to know these things if we are to survive.

In the UK we are being distracted by the in/out referendum of Scotland leaving us and the trivial news that Kate & William are expecting their second child ! I mean how irrelevant is that ! When the rest of the planet’s people are being bombed out of their homes and thrown off their land, being contaminated with radioactive fallout, poisoned with GM foods, contracting cancer by the millions, all neurological diseases increased ten fold in just a few years and we get Kate’s expecting another baby !!!!! give me a f…..g break.

Sometimes the spiritual, passive side of me gets taken over by the insanity of it all, how much more can we take of these genocidal, unhinged beings creating this unbelievable level of chaos for us and our loved ones ? But we must never lose sight of the real agenda, to locate and to possess our very soul/consciousness, so please meditate, use mantras, eat as healthy as possible and stay physically fit.


Please listen to this interview to the very end, for-instance, you’ll hear Leuren tell you that between 60 to 80 expert micro biologist’s have been murdered since 9/11 for what they were privy to, to ensure they could never reverse what they helped to create. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

ps next day after posting this the information in last video is just coming out as I write (9th Sept;)

“One must take draconian meaures of demographic reduction against the will of the populations. Reducing the birth rate has proved to be impossible or insufficient. One must therefore increase the mortality rate. How ? By natural means. Famine and sickness”. Robert McNamara

Leuren Moret

Homeless on Depopulation Hitlist

Flight 370

Did you like this? Share it:

Quelle Surprise NATO Decides To Continue The Decimation of Our Planet

Hello Dear Reader, started to write yesterday but trouble with connection.

As per usual, we hardly heard about the protests in Wales this week and when the UK media did give it any attention they singled out a group from the “Sandy Hook’ School of acting to air their monosyllabic views, disgraceful.


How predicatable ! the nest of viperous snakes commonly known as ‘our leaders’ met in Newport, Wales this week to implement plans decided beforehand at this years Bilderberg meeting. Cameron read from his masters notes talking tough against Putin ! But let me quote from the media written back in July……

“With a cynical grin, Russian business magnate Kirill Babayev told an audience of his peers how to inveigle their way into the British Establishment.
The first step, he declared, is to hire a few ‘grey-haired’ members of the House of Lords to act as ‘consultants’, or non-executive directors, of your company.

For just a few thousand pounds a month (chicken-feed to the average oligarch) they’ll usually agree to take a seat in your boardroom, Babayev said, providing an instant boost to a wealthy Russian’s prestige and contacts book. After that, securing a UK stock market listing, signing lucrative deals with British firms , or simply getting invited to all the right London parties becomes a piece of cake.

This cunning ruse works, Babayev added, even if the British peersdon’t know a thing about the operations’ of whatever company they agree to represent.
“They don’t actually do anything, and are perfectly aware of this fact,’ he chuckled, shamelessly. ‘But then again, these politicians are selling the name they made in the last century.’…..It continues but need I say more ?

The UK government has been bought by the Saudis and a host of Russian oligarchs, they are completely unprincipled. How this will all pan out is anyone’s guess.
But the deafening silence on the atrocious, genocidal acts of the Israeli government against defenceless civilians at the NATO Summit was sickening.
Anyone with eyes to see know that NATO is just a pseudo name for ‘One World Army’ and they have gradually taken over countries by stealth and The Ukraine is within their grubby grasp and they’re salivating at the thought of all that it entails.

Loads more money in the off shore bank accounts of Cameron’s arm’s dealing chums for a start, IMF gets a few more billions for so kindly helping them out, the stinking, sinking EU gets to plod on for a few more years sucking the life out of every country in its grip, keeping the Quangos afloat from money stolen from pensioners and workers. And on it goes…. What are we to do ? Well, as you know, I’m a great believer in claiming back your personal power, your health is a good place to start, once you become aware of the miraculous healing power of your own body you’ll no longer be in need of pill-pushing doctors on the payroll of ‘Big-Pharma’.
And the confidence that’s derived from being in control of this phenomenal vehicle knows no bounds and spills over inbto every aspect of your life, trust me, I’ve done it. Enjoy the clips here, love to you all, Janie,xxx


Cameron with his best buddies, (arms dealers ) bringing democracy to Libya !!! (worked out well that !)


“To be nobody but yourself – in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you like everybody else – means to fight the hardest battle which any human can fight, and never stop fighting.” E.E. Cummings 1894-1962 American poet, painter, author and playwright


Did you like this? Share it:

Cancer Research, Lies and Cannabis

Hello Dear Reader, I am so weary of listening to the utter bollox spewing forth from the main stream media. How can anyone with one iota of intelligence believe this crap ? As the war mongering members of NATO meet at Newport in Wales this week to devise the latest plan to carve up the booty of the Middle East and The Ukraine between themselves and the blatant slaughter of ordinary civilians continues, our dear leader, David Cameron insists that more bombing to these parts are necessary !

not for posting

Am I missing something here ? The Islamic State sponsored by the Saudis is the very latest bogey man (not forgeting Putin) for us to fear. Or so we are repeatedly being told, and yet the UK government fawn over and fete all and any members of the House of Saud when they honour us with their presence. The Queen holds sumptious banquets for them on a regular basis and yet this month alone 34 beheadings took place in Saudi Arabia ! (see video) And there’s silly me thinking that we abhor such barbaric brutality because we’re heading to world war 3 on the basis that beheading is the Islamic State’s choice of killing and must be stopped ! eh ? I’m losing the will to live here, help me out.

Also, over here in Orwellian land the NHS (National Health Service) is proving it’s position of being just another instrument of the State by imprisoning a man and his wife for removing their very sick child from their clutches as they wanted to give their child the least painful treatment for his particular condition (brain tumour) and had decided to have him treated with photon beam technology as opposed to the primitive and evil (but oh so profitable) use of chemo and radiotherapy.


But no, they’re only his parents what do they know ? So this bunch of ‘order followers’ decided to seperate this unfortunate child from the love and embrace of his flesh and blood mum and dad ! But how on earth could morons such as those involved have ever heard of LOVE being the best cure ever ?
In their heavily indocrinated minds they collectively decided to isolate this young boy from the people he needed to be with the most. Words really do fail me at times such as this. Thewhole story is online, please rad and watch rest of post.

The article today is about cancer research and what a scam it is, it’s from Philosophers Stone Views from the boat, love to you all, janie, xxx

“My ivestigation to date should convince this comittee that a conspiracy does exist to stop the free flow and use of drugs in interstate commerce which allegedly has solid therapeutic value. Public and private funds have been thrown about like confetti at a country fair to close upand destroy clinics, hospitals and scientific research laboratories which do not conform to the viewpoint of medical associations.
A report by Special Counsel for a United States Senate Investigation Committee.”


Cancer research charities throughout the world today, only ever undertake research that involves chemotherapy, radiotherapy and invasive surgery.

If their ‘treatments’ don’t involve butchery, poisoning or radiating your body to such an extent that your immune system becomes shattered and healthy cells will be destroyed along with the cancerous ones, then they are not interested.

Sometimes this destructive course will lead to an apparent ‘cure’ but this is often very short-lived as the disease returns to destroy what little is left of a devastated immune system, killing the patient long-term anyway but without that person’s death appearing in the statistics of ‘cancer victims’.

The myriad of charities and research institutions that make up the ‘cancer Industry’ exist only to support the profits of the criminal, Elite-controlled pharmaceutical industries.

In fact billions of pounds worldwide are siphoned from us, the poor deluded masses, into the coffers of the already mega-rich through highly persuasive, guilt-enhancing and fear-mongering advertising techniques as the controlled global media report one false breakthrough after another with monotonous regularity.

The simple truth is that there are cures for cancer but we are not allowed to know about them.

Indeed there is very impressive, certifiable evidence from former cancer patients who, having exclusively used ‘outlawed’ treatments, have won their battles against cancer successfully with no side-effects whatsoever.

The question we must therefore ask ourselves is, why do the cancer research charities not spend our donations testing the efficacy of all possible cures and not just ones that fulfil their own twisted agendas?

The answer to this question is fairly obvious really.

There are no mega-profits to be made out of ill health by promoting so-called ‘alternative’ or natural medicine and therefore it follows that in conventional medical research, there is no ‘level playing-field’ for those who wish to explore the efficacy and effectiveness of these apparently safe and proven treatments.

Unfortunately the Elite are completely in control of our medical profession, from medical education through to the highest-paid consultants, meaning in effect that even the majority, well-meaning, decent doctors and scientists are dictated-to by a system they do not fully understand and which they blindly serve without realising how they are being deceived on a massive scale.

Cancer research charities are in effect a complete and utter sham and a means by which huge sums of money are stolen every year from the people that they purport to be there to serve.

A strong case could easily be made against them for causing appalling and unnecessary harm to people’s, health, wealth and happiness.

Their experts in cancer care may only advise patients to look at alternative therapies in order to help mitigate the dangerous and unpleasant side-effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and on no account are they allowed to view them as a way of curing and beating the cancer itself.

Did you like this? Share it:

Political Correctness and Pakistani Perverts

Hello Dear Reader, yes of course I’m incensed by the continual slaughter of my fellow human beings in Gaza, Ukraine, Africa etc; but the story that’s occupied the media here in the UK this week about the horrific abuse of over 1,400 girls, some as young as 9 years old in Rotherham has also incensed me beyond words.

The very people that are paid 100′s of 1,000′s of pounds to protect children and uphold the law have deliberately turned a blind eye to this mind numbing cruelty. Yes RAPE of a minor is cruel ! It causes severe pain both physically and mentally, all the perpetrators of these vile acts were of Pakistani origin ! Now, think about it, if it had of been gangs of British white men grooming and plying 9 year old Asian girls with drink and drugs and raping and abusing them for what should be the best years of their lives there would be such an outcry from the authorities that they would all be rounded up and sentenced to imprisonment.

So what the f..k is happening ? It is my belief that the despicable Joyce Thacker Jackie Wilson, Erica Leach, Pam Allen, all in child protection to some degree and the shameless Shaun Wright the police and crime commissioner have all been on ‘Common Purpose’ leadership courses paid for by the tax payer.

Common Purpose adheres to the sexualisation of children, the deliberate breaking up of families and is a hidden menace in our government and schools. It operates in many European countries but is overly active here in the UK. Their secretive courses operate under Chatham House rules of the Council on Foreign Relations, CP graduates do not declare their status and remain hidden from public view.

Unusual language used in CP documentation and observed behind public website e.g how to recognise your controller, HOW TO CONTROL YOUR HOST CITY (Rotherham) plus texts of a highly socialist nature, changing values, and thought processes. Sounds about right. Lets not forget the role that the freemasons play too, they exert tremendous control over the police and judiciary. All so complex eh.

Don’t the police, social workers or councellor’s have daughters, sisters or grandaughters of their own ? How can they possibly sleep at night ? How do their brains work ? Not with any compassion that’s for sure. You really have to look to the root of this evil that prevails, why aren’t any journalist’s looking deeper ? It’s all so very sad.

My heart goes out to those poor young, vunerable girls taken in by these detestable predators. Where are the woman of these Pakistani men ? Can’t you keep them in check, seems to me the wives, sisters and mothers of these sexual fiends are complicit in this by staying silent about these depraved perverts, speak up, you should all be so ashamed.

But what’s also disheartening is the fact that the sexual abuse of children is rampant in every town in every country, fueled by the insatiable sexual appetites of men who’s minds have become so inured to depraved sexual acts by exposure to explicit pornographic sites that our precious children have been reduced to target practise.

Please become active in trying to stamp this out. I understand that we are up against the higher echelons of society, judges, politicians, aristocracy etc; but we have no choice, our children desperately need our help. Please watch videos below if you are unfamiliar with this abhorrent scandal. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

““A man’s immortality can be found in his children.” Patricia Briggs, Raven’s Shadow

The Jay Report

Did you like this? Share it: