Get Adobe Flash player

Sovereign Definition: Possessing Supreme or Ultimate Power

Hello Dear Reader, if it’s one thing that causes me the most despair it’s that so many of my fellow humans fail to grasp the magnitude of their magnificence and blindly continue down the path toward bondage, total servitude. I could cry and often do, for if it wasn’t for this mass amnesia there would be no war’….we would be incapable of hatred for our so-called enemies and we could truly change our world for our children and grandchildren so that they could experience life on earth as it was alway’s meant to be, peaceful and joyous, full of laughter, not a hideous cycle of work and sleep, fretting about where the next penny’s coming from to pay the bill’s.


We were created for much worthier things. You know this in your soul but somewhere along the line it’s been wiped clean from your memory, we must work at restoring ourselves to our former glory of infinite, loving beings and fast.

Here today is one such person who eloquently tells us how he sees it, Andy Whiteley, I hadn’t heard of him before, it’s always a delight to discover such soul’s exist. I came across this article from philosophersstoneviewsfromtheboat very good source of information and truth. I’m sure you’ll enjoy it, love to you all, Janie, xxx

“The fact is that the modern implementation of the prison planet has far surpassed even Orwell’s 1984 and the only difference between our society and those fictionalized by Huxley, Orwell and others, is that the advertising techniques used to package the propoganda are a little more sophisticated on the surface. Yet just a quick glance behind the curtain reveals that the age old tactics of manipulation of fear and manufactured consensus are still being used to force humanity into accepting the terms of its own imprisonment and in turn policing others within the prison without bars.” Paul Joseph watson


If We Are Free Sovereign Beings, Why Do We Ask For Permission?

13th October 2014

By Andy Whiteley

Co-Founder of Wake Up World

Sovereignty is a concept fundamental to our freedom. Without individual sovereignty, we are merely slaves. Without true independence, we may only walk someone else’s path.

As humanity continues to wake up to our true nature of being, to our divine relationship with our world and unbroken connection to the Source of life, it is crucial that we truly understand what it is to be a ‘sovereign being’. To begin, let’s look at the definition of the word ‘sovereign’ so we all start on the same page.

The Oxford Dictionary defines ‘sovereign’ as:

Sovereign /?s?vr?n (adjective):

Acting or done independently and without outside interference.
Possessing supreme or ultimate power.
So in considering our sovereignty, the question really is… Do we truly live “independently and without outside interference”? Do we possess “supreme or ultimate power” over our lives? And if not, who does?

Sovereigns and Subjects

How often do we hear the terms ‘Sovereign Nation’, ‘Sovereign State’, ‘Sovereign Debt’ or ‘The Sovereign Monarch’?

Despite its definition, today, we attribute the value of sovereignty only to institutions; to nations and monarchs. So consider…

If a monarch is sovereign and there is only one monarch, there can be only one sovereign – only one who acts independently and without outside interference. What about the rest of us? Don’t monarchs have subjects? Subject to what, you may wonder? Subject to outside interference, from those possessing supreme or ultimate power?

Let’s examine the word ‘Subject’ for a moment.

Subject /?s?bd??kt (noun):

An individual subjected to the rule by an elite, see feudalism.
Derived from the Latin word ‘subiectus’, meaning “lying beneath”. [source]
When we attribute sovereignty only to institutions, to nations or monarchs, we cannot also consider ourselves sovereign. Instead we are merely subjects.

When we consider ourselves as subjects, we assume the role of slaves, “lying beneath” others, unable to act independently and free of outside interference.

Is this really how we are willing to live?

If natural forces created life and humanity, and humanity created institutions, should institutions such as government not remain the instrument of humanity, and not the other way around?

We humans, like all living beings, are living breathing creations of Spirit or God force – whomever or whatever that force is. We are a part of the divine creation of life. Interconnected and multidimensional, we are an expression of life itself. And we were born to this abundant and fertile planet, and indeed born to this fascinating universe, simply to live – to enjoy it, feed from it, share in its abundance, and live as a conscious part of its wondrous mechanics.

So if a government institution assumes the authority to prescribe our rights, and to limit the manner in which we may enjoy and live and share and feed, does government not infringe on our birth right – our relationship with our natural world? Does it not assume authorship of nature’s creation?

The Government Trust Relationship


When the concept of government was created by humanity, it was created with a specific purpose; service delivery. To serve the specific needs of the community. Government was effectively entrusted with returning benefits to the people, as trustees to our needs as a society.

This relationship can be viewed as follows:

Trust relationship Government as Trustee model If We Are Free Sovereign Beings, Why Do We Ask For Permission?

(Let’s call this the Government Trust.)

Under this model, Government acts for and on behalf of the people. Your rights are inherent, based upon who and what you are as a living human being. The rules and objectives of Government were established by the People, and Government adopted those objectives on behalf of the People.

However the behaviour of those claiming to be “government” today is in complete contrast with this trust agreement. Today’s “government” acts as executor and beneficiary of this arrangement.

Trust relationship Government as Executor and Beneficiary model If We Are Free Sovereign Beings, Why Do We Ask For Permission?

(Let’s call this the Dictatorship Trust.)


In this model, “Government” possesses supreme or ultimate power and assumes the role of sovereign, and you act as a legal entity – a creation of the “Government”. Under this model, “Government” dictates the rules and objectives, and prescribes your rights and obligations. You are merely a trustee, employed to return benefits to “Government” as the sole beneficiary of the arrangement.

Contrast the two Trust diagrams above. Are you considered a free sovereign being under our current model of government? Or a regulated trustee to the priorities of government?

Now consider this situation a step further. If you are not sovereign under the current model of government, and your “Government” is claiming executor and beneficiary status over you and your community, isn’t your “Government” an impostor? Undemocratic? A dictatorship? Committing treason?

Self Determination or Dictatorship?
“Life, liberty and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary. It was the fact that life, liberty and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place” ~ Frédéric Bastiat, liberal theorist, political economist and member of the French assembly (1801-1850)

In our heavily regulated society today, who really possesses “the supreme or ultimate power” over our lives? Are we living lives of self-determination? Why does our system of government never really seem to serve us, no matter which way we vote? Are we bound to a veiled dictatorship in which opportunities are limited, debt is imposed, public thinking is manipulated, commerce is protected, and humans are regulated?

Look around. I think you already know the answer.

We are not regarded as sovereign beings by today’s “Government”. It does not operate as our Trustee, serving the will of the people. Instead it presumes to regulate, to grant us our rights. And it does so for the benefit of a small number of elite family empires, who operate behind a veil of secrecy and deceit – staggeringly, under the guise of democracy.

Now let’s consider for a moment the paradigm under which we are regulated.

If we allow our rights to be granted by government, don’t we assume the role of a slave – of one who is born without rights? If we allow government to grant us our rights, can’t they be withheld by government just as easily? Does that not leave us beholden to government as the highest power on the planet? What happened to our inalienable rights?

The intended role of government is to uphold the rights of the people, not to provide them. And in reality, a genuine democratic government can only grant privileges, not rights.

“A privilege is a special entitlement to immunity granted by the state or another authority…. In modern democratic states, a privilege is conditional and granted only after birth. By contrast, a right is an inherent, irrevocable entitlement held by all citizens or all human beings from the moment of birth” ~ Suzanna McNichol, The Law of Privilege (1st edition 1992)

As living beings of Gaia, it is our right to freely enjoy of her abundance. By allowing government to insert privileges in place of our inalienable rights, we grant government the right to assume a level of authority so superior that it may withhold access to our natural human rights, and limit our experience of Gaia – and of creation itself.

We have already established that such authority was never meant to be the purpose of true democratic government. So what is behind this emerging trend? Is it for our own protection, as government would have us believe? And if so, from what?

For Your Own Protection
Let’s call a spade a spade. The ongoing erosion of our natural human rights in favour of the rights of corporate and governmental institutions is being intentionally perpetrated by an imposter “government” under the guise of our “own protection”. Many of the perceived “threats” from which we are being “protected” by increasing regulation didn’t even exist until power-seeking governments and shadow governments created them… just to get the ball rolling in their direction.

The “War On Terror” is a perfect example. It was their first ‘big move’ toward instigating a military revolution.

The intention of the US Government was always to declare war. Several in fact. And, employing Hegelian Dialectic manipulation, they convinced the people of America and indeed the western world to support it – as a ‘solution’ to the ‘problem’ they created.

Its strategy was to take military control of foreign countries rich in natural and political resources, while creating a culture of fear and militarism under which government could assume increased powers – to monitor and control human activity, both inside and outside its borders. It created an outside “terrorist threat” in the minds of the Western world through the media staging of 9/11 (2001), the world’s most public ‘terrorist attack’; one immediately attributed to mid-east extremism before the dust had even settled. Scared rigid – intentionally so – the people perceived a problem and demanded a solution. And thus war was declared! For our own protection.

The war mentality that was subsequently embedded in the psyches of the general population create the perfect climate for the gradual introduction of tighter governmental control, over populations and minds, in the US and overseas, and over the natural resources of foreign lands. And all while providing untold financial gain to the US government and its corporate cohorts.

Enter the Patriot Act in the US, and comparable laws in Australia and other countries, and exit your individual human rights – for your own protection.

Don’t be fooled – this was no accident. Nor was it an isolated incident.

The Hegelian Dialectic has long been used by governments to manipulate public thinking toward predetermined ends. And it rarely fails – unless you know they’re doing it.

And now you know.

Seeking Permission
Dictating how we live was never meant as the purpose of democratic government. Nor was manipulating the psyche of a society to support its own veiled agenda. Surely that is the realm of dictatorship.

But as beings, many of us struggle with the concept of governing ourselves. Many do not even consider it possible! And this is largely due to the conditioning of our current power structure – that of Beneficial Government. It is a new kind of dictatorship; one that operates in shadows, by manipulating and undermining our sense of value; by pretending to be a democracy. So without question, we hand over our natural rights to others – the right to be the authors of our own lives on earth – we seek ‘permission’ from an external authority, believing we are giving ourselves to the oneness of society.

But increasingly, we as individuals are not benefiting from this arrangement. Our sovereign rights are being infringed upon, and the reality of our world is moving further away from our shared utopia – despite our potential.

It is no wonder that, today, many of us are now forced to stand up to institutions and their representatives, and assert our inherent human rights. The divine right of humanity. The right to determine the shape of our own lives.

And it can be no other way. The energy of Gaia has started to shift, and upheaval can be felt on a micro-macrocosmic level. We have no option but to change with this energy. It demands that each of us begins to live in alignment with our own natural instincts – independently and without outside interference – and with the Earth who sustains us.

The Source of Our Rights
For many of us, the first challenge we face today is deconstructing the psyche of ‘seeking permission’. And the first step is to understand the source of our rights, or privileges as they may be.

How often do we cite an external authority as the origin of our rights, as if those rights were granted to us by a document or an institution?

“It’s my first amendment right to…”

“I have the right under the constitution to…”

Who granted you those rights? Are they inherent? Or are they granted at the discretion of an outside authority?

Now contrast this mindset to the statement “I have the right to…” where the protection of that right is simply guaranteed by the constitution or law.

Which statement most reflects the mindset of a society in which government genuinely upholds the rights of its people?

If the real function of government is to uphold our natural rights, isn’t a government that presumes to grant your rights an imposter?

How can power be held by an institution of human creation and yet exercised over humans as a superior authority?

Surely any supposedly democratic government that presumes such a right over its people – its subjects – is over-stepping the bounds of its authority?

It’s time we adopt a new mindset.

Authority or Sovereignty?
The current debate in Australia over Aboriginal Recognition truly exemplifies our struggle with the concept of sovereignty under our current paradigm.

Politically packaged as a ‘rights’ campaign, in essence, the Australian Government is seeking the consent of the Original tribal people to submit to the power of the Commonwealth; to allow their rights to freely use land and water and sky to be provided, and just as easily withdrawn, by government.

Instead of consenting to have their privileges prescribed by Commonwealth law, many Original tribal people are re-declaring their unbroken sovereign rights as the Original custodians of the land. Objecting to the concept of being regulated as ‘Traditional Owners’ under Commonwealth law, they simply want their natural sovereignty recognized and protected – and actually upheld – and many are taking legal steps to re-assert their right to live unimpeded under Original tribal law.

The difference between these two positions is a distinct illustration of the power struggle between the Beneficial Government paradigm and the human beings who are demanding better. But in reality, the legal battle between the Commonwealth and the Original tribal people is unique. The fight for recognition of sovereignty has been an ongoing battle for the Original people for centuries; for the rest of our society, the question of sovereignty is rarely even scrutinised.

I am often asked by Wake Up World readers…

How do I go about becoming a sovereign being?

What’s the right way to go about declaring sovereignty?

Or in other words…

What paperwork do I need to sign to be freed?

To them I usually ask…

Are you seeking someone else’s consent to be free?

Isn’t that a contradiction in terms?

Who has the authority to give you permission to think and act independently?

By definition, doesn’t sovereignty come from within, not without?

If you are waiting for your freedom to be handed to you, think again. Sovereignty starts with you. You choose sovereignty for yourself; to feel sovereign; to think sovereign; to live sovereign, to be sovereign. But for most of us today, sadly, the idea of embodying sovereignty is a total paradigm shift.

By recognizing the authority of government, we consent to it standing between ourselves and our true nature. When we decide not to be dictated to, individually and as a society, the game simply ceases. No person or institution created by another can assert its power or authority over us, unless we choose to play along. We have the right to just say “Enough! No more!”… and they know it.

So forgive the deceit and move on with a sense of freedom and love. Attune to the relationship between you and the universe around you, and acknowledge it as the single ‘authority’ in your life – your true nature. Be the executor and beneficiary of your short time on Gaia. Allow your actions and interactions to be guided by the light of conscience and consciousness. And don’t be afraid to share it with others.

Once you make that internal realization and truly embrace your natural sovereignty, your outer world will begin to change with you. With all of us.

Be fearless. You are not alone.

Asserting Your Sovereignty
Of course, I encourage you – as a sovereign being – to do your own homework and reach your own conclusions about how best to integrate this mindset into your life. But here I will offer some thoughts from my own experience and research in hopes they may resonate for you, or activate an idea.

In declaring your sovereignty, perhaps the best starting point is the determination of your rights.

Government is the creation of human beings. It cannot dictate to another human being unless said human agrees to play along. That is our natural right.

If and when you consent to interact within the system of government, you consent to being bound by its rules and limitations as well as enjoy its limited benefits. But as a Trustee, this inevitably works against you – the system is not set up to benefit you. You are a Trustee to the aspirations of Beneficial Government. You will always be required to give more than you take…

And that understanding is the key. You give ‘the system’ energy. Without you and your energy, the system is nothing. Your power is in your being. Do you consent to play? Or will you simply go about your life, giving as you receive, and adhering to the universal laws ‘do no harm, cause no loss’?

By withholding your consent to interact with the system, and maintaining sovereignty in your mind heart and spirit, you assert the highest authority in that interaction.

Understand that those claiming government status rely on your consent to apply the legal system to your being. So before engaging with any unwanted approach with those claiming government status, take control of the conversation.

How do you do that? By being the person asking the questions.

Why are they asking for you to identify yourself with your Full Name (your identity as a ‘Legal Entity’)?

Are they trying to establish a contract with you? Are they seeking your consent to be regulated by them? As a legal entity?

What are your rights and responsibilities if you choose to engage in that interaction?

Can those rights and associated responsibilities be enforced if I simply identify myself as a living being? and refuse to acknowledge that I “understand my rights” as prescribed by government?

Any government agent that claims to grant or deny your natural rights, instead of protecting them, clearly demonstrates which trust they uphold: the Dictatorship Trust. So take the lead and ask them to identify themselves – not by showing you a shiny badge or letterhead, but by truly identifying their role and intent. And ask them to identify the entity they are trying to engage – the human being or the legal entity? Once that is established, you can then respond accordingly – by withholding your consent to create a contract with them, and outlining the terms under which you will engage them further.

Tell them you understand your natural rights and don’t accept the terms of the contract they are offering you. And watch the game change…

Such dealings with Beneficial Government may not always end well – but revolutions aren’t pretty. They’re just necessary. And the time is now.

Our Natural Rights
Today’s imposter governments thrive on the “word of law”, yet their actions contradict the spirit in which their laws were written, and encroach on the rights those laws are meant to protect. Too often, governments use modern legal systems as a tool to legitimize unlawful and unethical acts, while the expense of legal action and the complexity of legal language (‘legalese’) is exclusive, allowing only those within the system any real access to it.

But that system is a fiction. Regardless of what it says on government paper, or the emerging totalitarian culture it embodies, we have natural rights. We have the right to live freely, independently and without outside interference. To think and move and be. To enjoy all of Gaia’s fruits.

That is the natural law of Gaia. Government cannot give you that right, nor can it take that right away – unless you choose to allow it.

Rocking the establishment boat can take bravery – we have been trained our whole lives to respect the supreme authority of government and the mechanisms it imposes. But as universal beings, we are not bound to the authority of a man-made government, genuine, imposter or otherwise. Your identity as a living being gives you supreme authority over your own life. Simple.

The Last Word
I will finish with the words of US Founding Father and principal author of the Declaration of Independence (1776), Thomas Jefferson, who beautifully described each person’s inherent right to:

“… unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others” ~ Thomas Jefferson

As a sovereign being, your rights are to do whatever you please, limited only by the equal right of others to do whatever they please. Your freedom is your divine right as a living breathing being. It is up to you what you do with that freedom.

… and anyone who tells you otherwise is probably trying to control you.

Previous articles by Andy Whiteley:

The River – Navigating Your Own Spiritual Route (with Jennifer Deisher)
Individuality and Spirituality in the Age of Institutional Rule (with Ethan Indigo Smith)
16 Foods That’ll Re-Grow from Kitchen Scraps
GE Spokesperson Speaks to Wake Up World About Fukushima Nuclear Disaster (with Ethan Indigo Smith)
Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide
(ab)Original Elder Arrested in Parliament as Constitutional Challenge Gathers
More Corruption Revealed as NSW Government Pre-Approves Planning Application
Australian Government-Owned Media Caught In Censorship of Historical Archaeological Findings
“Esoteric” Content Censorship…. Coming Soon to a Website Near You
Corporations, Banks and Governments Lawfully Foreclosed for Operating Slavery & Private Money Systems
Acknowledgement: This article is featured as a guest contribution in the latest edition of New Dawn (Special Issue Vol.8 No.5)

New Dawn magazine explores ancient wisdom and new thinking, and examines the hidden dimensions of society, culture, history, religion and current events in a non-dogmatic way. New Dawn is available from news-agencies across Australia and New Zealand and in digital format at

About the author:

Andy 1 Copy 150×150 If We Are Free Sovereign Beings, Why Do We Ask For Permission?Andy Whiteley is a former corporate manager turned writer, editor and co-founder of Wake Up World. An advocate of peaceful revolution, Andy believes we are on a necessary path (albeit bumpy) to a renewed social model grounded in love, transparency, individuality, sustainability and spirit. Through his role at Wake Up World, he hopes to have a positive influence on that transition.

Andy lives in the NSW Central Coast region (Australia) with his partner of 13 years, WuW co-founder Ryan Mullins, and spends his (scarce) free time keeping fit and enjoying the beautiful nature reserves that sit, undisturbed, at their back door.

“Wake Up World, it’s Time to Rise and Shine!”

Did you like this? Share it:

The Root of Police Militarization

Hello Dear Reader, what a world eh, the disgraceful CIA in cohoots with MI5 subjecting their fellow beings to the most horrendous acts of torture, I wonder how long they’d last if the tables were turned ? 60 seconds maybe…most readers of this site and other truth post’s have known for years about this so we’re not actually surprised only that it’s taken so long to be reported in mainstream media. What could of happened to the individual perpertrators of such abominable deeds that make them obey such orders to torture like that ? Too sickening to contemplate.


And the UK establishment continue to close ranks when ever there is a whiff of paedophilia being exposed, one such case concerns a whistleblower who’s both witness and victim of child abuse at Beechwood Children’s Home in Nottingham, her name is Melanie Shaw and you can read or view the whole typically sad story at

Suffice to say they’ve used the same method’s to silence her as the many other’s who have attempted to expose this filth. They falsely accused her of arson they threw her in prison for 3 months where she was denied medical attention for her injured leg, the judge decided she was mentally unstable and delusional thus preventing her from ever being taken seriously about her very real accusations. Over 100 more children were abused at Beechwood Children’s Home and Melanie sais that many committed suicide or were murdered ! Just one more appalling story about the sexual abuse of children which so obviously involves establishment figures for it to be hushed up at every turn. Shame on these vicious, perverted cowards.

Today’s information is fron Ben Swann, an independent reporter of integrity, God bless him. His great video tells us how the militarization of the police in the US (and the UK) has been implemented.
Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“I don’t know if there are men on the moon, but if there are they must be using the earth as their lunatic asylum.” George Bernard Shaw


Ben Swann

All of our episodes are crowdfunded, Contribute to the Truth in Media Project Here

In the latest episode of Truth in Media, Investigative Journalist Ben Swann looks at the root of America’s current problem with the militarization of police.

“The militarization of America’s police forces has captured the nation’s attention, largely because of Ferguson, Missouri,” said Swann. “But what media has not told you, is how police forces got militarized in the first place, and why militarization is about a lot more than just military equipment.”

Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager was shot and killed by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson during a confrontation in August. His death triggered protests, some of which led to rioting and looting.

Swann points out that what really “stunned the nation” was the way police responded to the protests. Rather than responding like a police force that intended to serve and protect, Ferguson police responded like a military unit, complete with armored vehicles and flash grenades. Swann said that for millions of Americans, “this was a stunning site on American streets.”

Swann said that while has been working to raise awareness about the militarization of police for over a year, “the rest of the media acted like they had no idea.”

The program ignored by the mainstream media is the 1033 program. Also called the Department of Defense Excess Property Program, this platform is used by police departments to obtain military equipment. Swann explains:

“It is a federal program that provides surplus DoD military equipment to state and local civilian law enforcement agencies for use in counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism operations, and to enhance officer safety.”

While the 1033 program does provide armored vehicles and flash grenades, it also provides police departments with other emergency supplies that go beyond weaponry.

Larry Kirk, the Police Chief in Old Monroe, Missouri, which is just a few miles from Ferguson, said that he is against banning the 1033 program altogether, due to the fact that it gives smaller departments certain supplies they would not have been able to afford.

However, while Kirk is in favor of keeping the program, he is also one of the few police chiefs in the country who is opposed to departments receiving military weapons. Kirk explained that he is skeptical about the level is militarized weapons that he has seen come through the program recently.
“Being realistic, there is no reason I would ever need an MRAP,” said Kirk. “Most departments would never need one.”

Swann further described the “MRAP,” which is one of two armored vehicles that police departments are given by grant, through the 1033 program. The vehicles, which were originally made to fight in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, were kept by the Department of Defense after the wars cooled down, and are now being granted to local police departments.

According to a report from the New York Times, “about 500 planes, helicopters, and mine-resistant armored vehicles have been obtained, alongside 94,000 machine guns.”

Swann said that following the protests in Ferguson, Americans began to realize the size and scale of the military equipment that was available to local police, and they “began calling for police departments to do away with military vehicles.”

Swann also pointed out that while the mainstream media has covered the protests, it hasn’t worked to provide Americans with the keys to the root of the problem.

“What media has not helped the public understand is that the real problem with militarization is not military equipment,” said Swann. “It’s the use by police of military tactics.”

Swann gave three examples of incidents in which police used military tactics to serve warrants on drugs:

The first example occurred in Detroit, Michigan, when 7-year-old girl Aiyana Jones was awakened in the middle of the night by a stun grenade developed for wartime raids, called a “flash bang,” which was thrown by a SWAT team, and immediately set fire to her blanket. Following the release of the grenade, the SWAT team stormed into the house, and mistakenly shot Jones through the neck, killing her.

A second incident occurred in Tucson, Arizona, when a SWAT team attempted to serve a search warrant as part of a multi-house drug crackdown. Jose Guerena, an Iraq war veteran who lived in the house, instructed his family to hide while he got his gun, after his wife became alarmed at the sight of a shadowy figure standing in their front yard, holding a gun. Guerena retrieved his gun – leaving the safety on – and stepped into the living room. The SWAT team then entered the house and shot him 60 times.

Swann noted that the police “have still never said whether they found drugs” in Guerena’s home.

A third example occurred in Atlanta, Georgia, when a SWAT team visited a family’s home in search of a small amount of drugs they believed were in the possession of the family’s nephew. The parents, three daughters, and a 19-month-old baby boy were asleep in a converted garage when police opened the door and threw a stun grenade in. The grenade landed in the 19-month-old baby’s crib. It blew a hole in his chest, and resulted in such severe burns that the baby was placed in a medically induced coma.

Swann said that, according to author Radley Balkow, “The most common use of SWAT teams today is to serve narcotics warrants, usually with forced, unannounced entry into the home.”

These raids have become increasingly frequent, with as many as 40,000 occurring every year. Swann pointed out that the raids are “needlessly subjecting nonviolent drug offenders, bystanders, and wrongly targeted civilians to the terror of having their homes invaded while they’re sleeping, usually by teams of heavily armed paramilitary units dressed not as police officers but as soldiers.”

“Despite what the media spin-doctors will tell you, militarization has nothing to do with the war on terror, and it has everything to do with perpetuating the war on drugs,” Swann said.

Kirk said that he believed the United States has created so many different wars, from the war on crime to the war on drugs, that it has left police officers in the perpetual state of needing to be a “warrior.”

“If you continue to tell people they are in a war, you are going to create warriors,” said Kirk. “You are going to create soldiers that you are now putting on the street.”

Swann traveled to Washington DC to investigate the root of militarization. He noted that although DC has military gear and uses military tactics, “it does not participate in the 1033 program.”

Swann spoke with Seema Sadanandam, the ACLU Director of the Nation’s Capital. Sadanandam explained that while the picture of tanks in the streets was the “most visceral and extreme example” that came out of Ferguson, there is more to the concept of police militarization.

Sadanandam said that the fact that DC does not utilize the 1033 program would be surprising to members of the black communities who have been “subjected to law enforcement’s militarized war on drugs.”


While DC does not participate in the program, it does use military tactics on a daily basis. One of the tactics used, is referred to as the “jump out car.

Sadanandam explained that a “jump out car” is an unmarked car containing four to six officers, dressed in tactical vests, who jump out of the car to ambush their target. “They literally jump out of the car and surprise people,” said Sadanandam, who went on to say that the main objective is to convince people to submit to a so-called “consent search.”

According to Sadanandam, the tactic of using jump out cars is only acceptable in black, brown, and indigent communities, and is not seen in all-white communities.

“In Dupont circle, for example, which is a largely white community and where we know that there is regular cocaine use and cocaine possession, you would never see jump out cars jumping out on a group of white men in business suits, and police saying they fit the description of regular cocaine users,” said Sadanandam. “That would be considered completely unacceptable.”

Swann attended a meeting in southeastern DC, where black residents gathered to express their frustration with militarized police. He noted that people living in these neighborhoods say militarization for them is “not about the idea that so many of us have been confronted with” in the last few months. Instead, it is something they have been dealing with their entire lives.

Orlando Bego, the Pastor of Centerpoint Baptist Church, said that in the midst of the events in Ferguson, the nation was watching the wrong problem, and that getting rid of the 1033 program will not solve the real problem.

“Ferguson is not new,” said Bego. “It may be new for the mass of people who watch it on media outlets, but for people who live in inner city, urban neighborhoods, that is a common tactic that is used.”

Bego believes that even if the 1033 program were eliminated, the military mindset instilled in police officers would still be present. He said he dreads the day that his 10-year-old son, who currently wants to grow up to be a police officer because he views officers as heroes who serve and protect, is “pulled over for driving while black,” or “stopped and harassed for making eye contact.”

Ben Swann maintains that while Americans should be outraged at the idea of militarization, it should not be just because police show up in tanks to a protest. It should be because of the tactics that have been used by police for years, such as using battering rams to knock down people’s doors, and throwing stun grenades through windows, all for the sake of serving drug warrants.

“The militarized mindset isn’t about gear, it’s about tactics,” said Swann. “When we talk about things like ‘no hesitation targets,’ where police are taught to shoot a child holding a gun, or shoot a pregnant woman holding a gun, at what point do we as a public tell police, ‘Stop. We want you to hesitate.’”

Swann noted that while there are still many men and women who become police officers to serve and protect their communities, the problem occurs in the militarized way they are being trained. “They’re being taught to kill or be killed, that every suspect they encounter could be their last encounter, and that every person walking the streets of every community, is a threat, when in fact, it’s simply not true,” Swann said.

“Militarization takes good cops and teaches them to act like they’re in a warzone,” said Swann. “But the streets of the United States of America are not a warzone, and it’s up to us, the public, to keep it that way.”

Did you like this? Share it:

If In Doubt Take It…Civil Forfeiture Seizure Tactics Exposed

Hello Dear Reader, phew, it’s either all or nothing with me eh, ‘back with you again so quickly ! You really know when you’re on a true mission in life when you simply have to expose and share every injustice that comes to your attention immediately with your human family. That’s how I feel about this post, the scandalous activities of these immoral, shameful individuals making money from the poor souls that can least afford to lose anything, brilliantly laid bare here, compiled by Nick Sibilla, don’t think these videos will be up for too much longer, see for yourself.

The TV is covering the protests across the US over the recent spate of deaths of young black men killed by their out-of-control, militiarized, beyond reproach, McDonald fueled police force. I really understand their anger but I think we may be witnessing one of the very necessary, deliberate provocation of the powers that be, and that is to divide and rule, when we have black against white, christians against muslims, shi-ites against sunni’s then we have all of our energy focused entirely in the wrong direction ! Whilst are eyes are trained elsewhere they’re finalising the completion of total human slavery by all of the means covered on earlier posts, stay alert my friends.

love to you all, Janie,xxx

“War is the greatest evil Satan has invented to corrupt our hearts and souls. We should honor our soldiers, but never honor war.” Dean Hughes ‘Far From Home’

IF IN DOUBT…TAKE IT!” Behind Closed Doors, Government Officials Make Shocking Comments About Civil Forfeiture
There are three kinds of people in this world: Those who’re outraged by civil forfeiture, those who don’t know what it is and those who profit from it.

posted on Nov. 10, 2014, at 2:04 p.m.
Nick Sibilla

This post was created by a user and has not been vetted or endorsed by BuzzFeed’s editorial staff. BuzzFeed Community is a place where anyone can post awesome lists and creations.” Learn more or post your buzz!

Without even needing to charge someone with a crime, law enforcement can seize and keep cash, cars and even homes, by exercising civil forfeiture. Now the Institute for Justice has uncovered recordings of government officials from across the country making unsettling comments about this controversial power:
• One city attorney called his legal documents a “masterpiece of deception” and has won 96 percent of his forfeiture cases.
• An assistant district attorney takes property, even from owners who have been acquitted, because “people are not found innocent, they are found not guilty.”


• One government official doesn’t want to disclose information about civil forfeiture, because it might become a “bullet-point for people that are trying to fight the program.”
• A prosecutor teaches other attorneys how to take property from innocent people. He even offers this piece of advice, “IF IN DOUBT…TAKE IT!”

1. Government Official Comes Up With a “Trap” to Seize Homes, Even in States That Legalized Marijuana
(Watch for about 45 seconds)

Speaking at a forfeiture conference on September 10, 2014, Pete Connelly, City Attorney for Las Cruces, New Mexico, detailed his plan that would let police take the homes of people caught with tiny amounts of marijuana, even in states where the plant is legal:
“I got to thinking this morning, in the paper that everybody is running around liberalizing marijuana or thinking about it. Putting it on the ballot. Taking it off the ballot. And I thought, boy, what a trap. You liberalize marijuana so somebody can sell it, they sell the marijuana out of the house, then you seize the house, which is like 10 bucks of marijuana and you [the police] get a $300,000 house. What a deal. That’s really exciting. They get what they want, and you get what you want. And the title of that article in the [Wall Street] Journal was ‘What’s Yours Is Theirs.’ I want to turn it around as ‘What’s Theirs is Yours.’”
It sounds terrifying (and it should be). But this can already happen due to an obscure federal program known as “equitable sharing.” Police can circumvent state laws if they collaborate with a federal agency, forfeit the property under federal law and then earn up to 80 percent of what the property is worth.
The Institute for Justice represented Tony Jalali, a landlord in Anaheim, Calif. who rented space to a medical marijuana dispensary. That dispensary sold $37 worth of cannabis to an undercover officer, who posed as a patient with a doctor’s recommendation. Jalali never bought or sold marijuana. Nor did the government charge him with a crime.
But under equitable sharing, Anaheim police teamed up with the DEA to bypass California state law, which not allows only medical marijuana, but also requires a criminal conviction to forfeit real estate. After IJ sued, the government backed down and dropped the forfeiture case. But this loophole remains unchanged, so other property owners are still vulnerable.
2. Legal Documents are a “Masterpiece of Deception”
(Watch for about 20 seconds)

During one of his presentations, Connelly offered tips on how to write an effective forfeiture complaint (i.e. the legal papers the government files). If done well, “the complaint is, what I call, a masterpiece of deception,” filled with statements that are “very hard to deny.”
3. The Government Wins 96 Percent of Forfeiture Cases
(Watch for about 30 seconds)

That deception pays off. When it comes to forfeiture cases, Las Cruces has a 96 percent success rate. For the rest, “we make deals” to settle their cases. Connelly also thought it was “amazing” no owner has appealed a motor vehicle case since 2006. So like a Vegas casino, Pete Connelly almost always wins.
4. “We’re Not Dealing With the Beemer Crowd”
(Watch for about 30 seconds)

If civil forfeiture truly targeted drug kingpins, then police would regularly seize all kinds of high-end, flashy cars. But according to Connelly, “we’re not dealing with the Beemer [BMW] crowd so much. We deal with just down-to-earth human beings that have their cars seized.” He even joked, “Under our ordinance, we have cornered the 1978 Cadillac motor vehicle part of southern New Mexico.”
5. Cops Are on the Lookout to Seize a “Good Car”

(Watch for about 90 seconds)

According to Connelly, “we always try to get, every once in a while, maybe a good car.” He recounted how police tried to seize a 2008 Mercedes-Benz, during a stakeout at a bar: “The cops were undercover and were like ‘Ahhh!’” when they saw it. Had police forfeited the Benz, it would have been “the big seller” at a police auction. But they acted too hastily and so the car was ultimately returned to its owner.
6. Civil Forfeiture is “Self-Serving” But “Don’t Feel Bad” About It
(Watch for about 10 seconds)
(Watch for about 1 minute)

During a presentation, Connelly let it slip that he thinks forfeiture ordinances are “self-serving.” Though if any law enforcement officers feel guilty or remorseful about seizing property, Connelly paraphrased a New Mexico court decision to assuage them: “If you make money on motor vehicle seizures, it’s ok, don’t feel bad.”
7. The Government Doesn’t Want To Disclose Data on Civil Forfeiture Because It Might Help “People That Are Trying to Fight the Program”

(Watch for about 30 seconds)

Also at the forfeiture conference in New Mexico was Stanley Harada, Chief Hearing Officer for Albuquerque and a “significant architect” for that city’s vehicle forfeiture law. He was asked just how much Albuquerque takes in from civil forfeiture. While he didn’t have that information, Harada did drop this bombshell: “I think they would rather not talk about those numbers because then it starts becoming more of a bullet-point for people that are trying to fight the program.”
In New Mexico, agencies are not required to collect data on how much revenue civil forfeiture has raised. That clearly prevents the public from holding police and prosecutors accountable for their actions. Moreover, if voters were aware just how often the government seized property, they’d be more likely to demand reforms.
Access to basic information about civil forfeiture is surprisingly hard to come by. According to the Institute for Justice’s report, “Policing for Profit,” about 30 states either do not track or collect forfeiture data, did not respond to IJ’s FOIA requests or they provided information that was unusable.
8. New Jersey Legal Academy Offers “Entertaining” Course on Civil Forfeiture

Did you like this? Share it:


Hello Dear Reader, sorry for my absence, put dear mum to rest, she’s back with dad now. The first short clip here is very graphic but we have to face what’s being done to huge amounts of innocent civilians by the West, it’s evil, it’s abhorrent it’s got to be stopped.

We all know by now the real reason’s that innocent men, women and children are being murdered in the most gruesome way, across the planet, it’s for the blood-thirsty, psychopaths to gain access to the assets, gold, diamonds etc; sheer profiteering from people’s abject misery, war to them is such a fantastic way to do business. And of course you’ve got the satanic aspect, they revel in the creation of terror that occurs on a massive scale, the colossal loss of life and blood and the fearful energy that’s produced, is literally food to them.

But it’s not all doom and gloom as protests over injustice are gathering speed worldwide, indicating an enormous awakening, let’s stay hopeful eh, I know I am. We know too that we cannot believe a word from the main stream media about war in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria as it’s all controlled by the same grimy, lying bastards that perpetrate them. These videos say it perfectly, please watch, love to you all, janie, xxx

“we have grasped the mystery of the atomand rejected the Sermon on the Mount. Ours is a world of nuclear giants and ethical infants. we know more about war than we know about peace, more about killing than we know about living.” general Omar Bradley 1893-1981

From Choice and Truth (very graphic)

next False Flag

Joe Rogan – Stupid People & America’s war Economy

Did you like this? Share it:

Secrets In Plain Sight – Scott Onstott

Hello Dear Reader, been a horrible week personally, NHS killed mum off by injecting her with Cyclizine, an anti-sickness drug that should never have been given to my mother with her particular health problems, she had an anaphylactic shock and never recovered. I will fight for you mum, God rest her lovely soul.

Here in ol’Blighty the war drums rumble on, terrorist threats being used continually to oppress the citizens, to keep them psychologically incapable of resistance to increasing violations of privacy.

“Only during war or the threat of war are the masses compliant enough to accept what ever they are told by their government without complaint.
Fear of conquest and pillage by an enemy can make almost any burden seem acceptable by comparison” (from Report From Iron Mountain by Leonard Lewin, which I posted here in full 3 years ago)

King Cameron has given a speech suppose to appease the plebs over mass immigration which, as he well knows is all part of the blueprint on how to destroy a nation: flood a country with immigrants…..sexualise children….destroy the family unit…criminalise free speech…..milatarise the police, all to reduce the serfs into quivering, cap doffing, mental wrecks willing to follow and carry out any orders from their elite saviours, aaaaarghh.


Me thinks it was written by his right hand man of whom we never hear anything about, step forward Sir Jeremy Heywood, Cabinet Secretary. According to Dominic Cummings, Cameron doesn’t make a move or say a thing without Heywoods permission, same as Ronald Reagan taking orders from his then second in command George W Bush senior, it’s always been the guy behind the scene that’s really in charge of things so can’t see why it would be any different now.


Here’s a great video spelling out the meaning of the ancient use of symbols and art and is a wonderful reminder of just how very, very, special our human vehicle is, take care of it, we need to be in tip top shape for what’s-a-coming ! Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“The government consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taken one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have only talent for getting and holding office. Their principal device to that end is to search out groups who pant and pine for something they can’t get and to promise to give ot to them. Nine times out of ten that promise is worth nothing. The tenth time is made good by looting A to satisfy B. In other words, government is a broker in pillage, and every election is ort of an advance auction sale of stolen goods.” H.L.Mencken 1880-1956

Secrets In Plain Sight is an awe inspiring exploration of great art, architecture, and urban design which skillfully unveils an unlikely intersection of geometry, politics, numerical philosophy, religious mysticism, new physics, music, astronomy, and world history.
Exploring key monuments and their positions in Egypt, Stonehenge, Jerusalem, Rome, Paris, London, Edinburgh, Washington DC, New York, and San Francisco brings to light a secret obsession shared by pharaohs, philosophers and kings; templars and freemasons; great artists and architects; popes and presidents, spanning the whole of recorded history up to the present time.

As the series of videos reveals how profound ancient knowledge inherited from Egypt has been encoded in units of measurement, in famous works of art, in the design of major buildings, in the layout of city streets and public spaces, and in the precise placement of obelisks and other important monuments upon the Earth, the viewer is led to perceive an elegant harmonic system linking the human body with the architectural, urban, planetary, solar, and galactic scales. Scott Onstott

Did you like this? Share it:

Leaked Bilderberg Closing Remarks 2014

Hello Dear Reader, not in a good place at the moment, my dear mum died in the most horrendous way at the hands of the ‘Common Purpose ‘ trained staff of the NHS. I’m not saying that CP training takes place at nursing level but the programmed mind-set of those higher up the pecking order that have under taken ‘leadership courses’ is blatantly evident and has filtered down through to all levels.

She was in poor health, granted, but also, coherent and alert upon arrival at Kingston Hospital UK, but within 24 hours she had an anaphylatic fit due to an anti-sickness drug Cyclozine being administered intravenously. After just 2 minutes she was reduced to a terrified, hallucinating, incoherent wreck, it was the most upsetting sight to witness, the more so, being unable to help.

I’ll be brief, she never recovered, and a few hours later her heart stopped beating when there was not one member of staff on the ward so they had no idea as to how long her brain was deprived of oxygen only that if she did ever recover she would be in a permanent, vegatitive state !
This is my mother ! whom I’d promised faithfully, I’d never let die in an uncaring NHS hospital. I really thought she’d be coming home, it wasn’t to be.

(Not my mum)

Worrying: Up to 50 per cent of those questioned in the NHS survey in some areas said they felt unsafe because they believed they were at risk of abuse or physical harm (file picture)

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The doctor now refuses to sign the death certificate forcing me to subject my mums precious body to a post-mortem ! One of her worse nightmares, there’s something so seriously wrong here but you, my reader, already know that eh ?

Today’s post I found at What’s The True News very interesting.
Make of it what you will.

There’s a massive “terrorist’ threat here in the UK ! if you can’t scare them to death with ebola pull the “terrorist’ card out ! yawn, yawn.

I wonder if Peter Power will be rolled out to perform an ‘exercise’ at the exact moment, at the exact location of the so-called ‘real’ event ?
Wouldn’t surprise me, they’re soooo predictable.
Anyway, enjoy today’s post, love to you all, janie, xxx

“He who is the author of war lets lose the whole contagion of hell and opens a vein that bleeds a nation to death.” Thomas Paine

Posted on November 1, 2014 by Jean
Apparently, this is not a very good translation from the French, but it certainly does not hinder our understanding! ~J

Leaked Bilderberg Closing Remarks – 2014

From: (translated below)

” EXCLUSIVE SCOOP: the top secret classified report of the last meeting of Bilderberg … “

My dear contarians, my dear contrarians!

This is a special edition, very special that I propose today. I would like you to understand the real ways of the world, the world in which we live but more likely for very long time.

I reproduce in lines below the exclusive report of the last meeting of Bilderberg, this meeting which is held every year and which attend personalities of very high level of all the countries of the world. It is in this kind of inner circle set that, for decades, shapes the world of tomorrow.

Before addressing the bulk of the document which has been leaked, I suggest you watch this video of TF1. It dates back 40 years! Well almost, 1977 to be exact, and yet …

Top Bilderberger Gideon (George) Osborne
George Osborne

[In this 1977 video, TF1 journalist Yves Mourousi is speaking of the pronouncing of the Bilderburg meetings, of inner circle officials of different countries meeting, and with British journalist Gordon Tether speaking of the attendees, of how people of power be made.Yves Mourousi speak that they would surely speak again about the Bilderburgers.But, not so. There was no more of the reporting by news journalists of the Bilderburgers after this. Gordon Tether’s articles were banned, and when he refused to comply with the news medias ban of reporting on Bilderburgs, he was fired and banned from all news organizations.
Other news journalists got the message,—-comply or else.]…8e51fc603/
[The above video is on a page with several other videos and it appears to be all in Russian. For our purposed here, it then seems meaningless. ~J]

Record account of annual meeting. Classified Top Secret. For exclusive use of members.

Closing Remarks by the Chairman of the meeting.

Beyond capitalism. Crossing the new frontier.

Christine Lagarde

If we continue to maintain control of the masses by the classical wage labor within a framework of a system built on mass production and mass consumption with the solvency of the consumers by allocating a portion of the wealth created via work, we all have now acquired the certainty that the long-term survival of the human species, the backup and the sustainability of a viable biosphere and in harmony with the human activities required a total reorganization of our modes of thought, organization and production.

As we all know, in fact the goal we are pursuing is neither totally vain accumulation of new wealth or even the rescue of an economic system, it was used for more than three centuries and become incompatible with our vision of the future.

The objective which we pursue is obviously the one of the eternal life, or in any case the passage to the man living two centuries and we join here the ambitious ideas of transhumanism which we wish to develop, to install to favor the emergence of a new human being. Of a superman. As well as our technologies allow us from now on to possess said tools of “augmented reality”, our researches perfectly succeeded as regards “the increased man”. Our technologies are perfectly developed. We are ready to live two centuries. Our nanotechnologies allow us to repair the bodies of the inside, the decoding of the human genome allowed us to understand the functioning of the cellular aging which we are not capable of stopping, but of slowing down considerably. Our control of stem cells allows us to re-make at the demand any cellular tissue or still obviously any organ which would become failing.

Finally, our control of the human genome allows us as well to select the most effective and most adapted genetic heritages, without forgetting the fact that by modifying some we can finally increase our physical as well mental abilities.

Our illustrious predecessors of the 30s thought naively that we could transpose, for the improvement of the human race, the methods used for the optimization of dog breeds by crossings skilfully organized. Nevertheless, these failures of the “Nazism” allowed us to explore new ways and to reach the success which we celebrate today. We finally uncovered the secrets of the eternal life, the ultimate conquest of the man become finally his own god and his own master. We are all, us here gathered, Alpha and Omega of this New World which opens to us and which it is thus advisable to us to shape.

Obviously, as you know, it raises absolutely colossal problems of implementation and it was all the challenge in the works of the various committees in which you participated throughout these intense days of seminar.

We have all an acute consciousness of the fact that the planet and our environment cannot obviously support the eternal life of tens of billion human beings who would consume in the same way as today. We know all that an infinite growth, including demographics in a finite world is an intellectual aberration. We all understood that to divide the world into two castes, that of the mortal and the immortal, would simply be impossible because in one case we suggest to live and to the others to die, so putting working and mainstream masses in a situation where they would have nothing to lose any more, except I remind to you that the main tool of the control of the peoples passes by the fact of granting benefits calculated allowing to give the illusion of a loss in case of rebellion.

Here’s Marie-Josée Kravis, advisor to the New York Fed, accessorizing brilliantly with her snake-effect silk scarf off on a power walk with her billionaire financier husband Henry Kravis, head of predatory investment company KKR. No one rocks sunglasses like this pair.


The whole of these fact returns the deployment of the technologies of immortality and improvement of the man simply impossible for the moment.

The working groups have therefore submitted a number of proposals that were discussed by the full committee. I’ll just cite the most important measures that were passed unanimously in accordance with our privacy practices of our Grand Masters. It will be up to apply and implement each in your respective country and geographical area of influence, the following decisions.

The initial objective is the massive depopulation in protecting at best the environment, which is tantamount to exclude from the fields of our possible use of any nuclear weapons which would be tantamount to inflicting some irreparable damage to our so small planet. which is to exclude from the scope of our possible use of any nuclear weapons that would inflict some irreparable damage to our planet so small. The resources that we have are few in number, but their cumulative efficiency is certain since in returning to resonance we will get what the military call a “multiplier effect of force”. It is the triptych. economic collapse, civil war and massive epidemics. The use of these three tools should allow us to eventually reduce the world population from 7-10 billion inhabitants. We think that to reach our objective of 500 million human beings alive is illusory and that in spite of all our efforts of reduction, pockets of survivors will remain almost everywhere throughout the planet. Nevertheless, these pockets should not raise us of major problems, at least at first because of their disorganization, their isolation and their incapacity to master all the techniques if only current because of their weak number should limit considerably their power of nuisance. We think that in some years many will disappear and that little who will remain will return more or less quickly to the wild in a few generations. Any group that threatens us is, in all cases, treated quickly.

I feel sorry for the billionaire John Elkann. He has an Italianate sense of flair, but it quite often misfires. Elkann is the heir to the Agnelli billions and a board member of the Economist Group. He’s also the proud owner of the worst article of clothing manufactured in the last 700 years of western civilization.


Wow. It’s like a war crime against cashmere. And what’s going on with the shoulders? Are they padded? Did he knit it himself? Did he lose a dare? Does he not have a single person in his life to say: “John, you know that pink jumper you love so much? I threw it in the canal.”

Elkann is having a chuckle with ACE insurance boss Evan Greenberg, who sits on the board of Coca-Cola.

Our main historic enemy to the implementation of our plan was obviously the national states. Globalization, globalization, European institutions, mass immigration were so many tools that we have used with great success for 30 years and now national identities and feelings of belonging were significantly reduced, as patriotic feelings. Money and ownership have become the core values ??of many. The politicization of the masses has been significantly reduced, nations as we hoped, become fragile and can now be destabilized from within.

We thus have to pursue with constancy the immigration policy allowing to make considerable masses of poor people come from the South into impoverished countries of the North. We have to with constancy make rise the most radical Islam to instigate at the most the hatreds and the dissension in the peoples. When we will bring economic collapse, then the most absurd that we have developed in each country lead most of these countries to large-scale civil wars where each community will be responsible for us to kill the largest number communitarianism members of the other community. When we shall provoke the economic collapse, then the most absurd communitarianism which we have developed in every country will conduct the largest part of these countries towards large-scale civil wars where every community will take charge for our account to kill the largest number of the members of the opposite community.

Blacks against whites in the USA, Muslim against Christians in Europe, these civil wars will have the immense advantage to destroy the people without confrontations between degenerate countries into nuclear power world war . Finally, when the wars will destroy countries, we shall take advantage of it to amplify the distribution of viruses such as our project of e-bola 2.0 modified genetically which we test at present with efficiency because we obtain invaluable epidemiological, sociological data (behavior of the individuals in front of the disease) but we also visualize our capacity to saturate systems of care which will be already considerably degraded, in every case, by the civil wars which we shall have created on the example of the war between the two Ukraines.

All these elements, lack of preparation of the peoples, their dependence towards all the support systems will make them particularly vulnerable to our various actions. The economic collapse should quickly propagate to the whole planet. China will collapse under the weight of social unrests and Russia, which still raises us problems at the moment, should see its problem settled in 2015 as we hope for it, but lets say that for the moment it is the Russian-Chinese axis which sets the biggest resistance against our vision of future. We do not exclude, if we did not manage to convince, to use the weapon of the assassination targeted towards personalities refusing our program of depopulation and the support to our ideology of the eternal life.

Obviously, for all those who would not have understood it, what you have just read has no relationship with the reality and any resemblance with one or several existing characters would be purely coincidental (or not….). It is of course about science fiction (or not completely….). It was just the short story, taken out of my fertile mind (or elsewhere…), which I wanted to tell you. You can of course fall to sleep again quietly.

Let us say that it is just about the starting point of the fact that could be a novel (or not…..) but the fact remains that, like as any story, it raises real questions.

Not everyone wants the press to be here

The extra scrutiny afforded the group this year was particularly tough on General Keith Alexander, the recently replaced head of the NSA. The general gave a visible sigh when he was shown the lenses pointing at him…


General Alexander
Poor Keith. He really hates people looking at him without his permission. He’s spent so long snooping on the general public that it must have been a dreadful shock to the system to have the tables turned.

The very idea of ‘privacy’ is on the table

Alexander is a world expert in privacy (and how to rid the world of it), and it’s likely he had plenty to say during the conference discussion on the subject: “Does privacy exist?” Unfortunately I don’t know what he said, because the discussion was private.

The eternal life, which is at the heart of the strategy of a company as Google (among which the links with the most secret authorities of the USA as the NSA or CIA are clearly demonstrated), asks the question of the possibility of the accessibility of all to the eternal life. Can we be 10, 20 or 30 billion human beings to populate the planet and to consume? The answer is naturally negative, then in such a necessarily hypothetical case, than would we make men and women too? Read here an excellent article of the JDD on the Laurent Alexandre’s last book ” the death of the death ” detailing the strategy of Google.

The transhumanism is not a fancy of the mind, it is even an ideology fundamentally profoundly disgusting that always existed even if it bore other names in other times. The transhumanism develops even in a relatively transparent way with almost bare face and finally, nobody finds so much anything wrong there, but that will there be a man when the man will scientifically be improved to become a superman, and does not it still remind you anything?

Other question, we begin finally to speak a little about the devastation that is going to cause the arrival of robotics, and France too even dedicated a report on this matter on the JT (TV NEWS) of 20 hours of yesterday on this study which announces the disappearance of 3 million jobs in France before 2025 – but I can assure you that it will be much more and much more fast – and which gives us fast a reason for hope by going to show us a company of aeronautics which even started work at the same time as it installed……. a robot!

All this brings us to two thorough questions. The first one it is that factually, by eliminating all the jobs and the working maximum to optimize the earnings, companies finally get out quite a shot in the forward foot because obviously, there will not be a solvent consumer anymore and thus of profit, then why to pursue this policy, wherever from the idea in reality the system does not try to save itself but “to surpass itself” and, from now on, the border of division between the rich and the poor people is not so much the money than the access to the eternal life.

Other big question, corollary of the first elements, you can see that the man sees his “marginal utility” collapsing. Mao said that a man was a mouth to be nourished but two arms (to work). Simple but justified economic calculation. The man with the two arms it is a “working strength”. Moreover, all our economy is based on this type of postulate. Nevertheless we see well that the man becomes useless and will become especially even more as the new machines which arrive will allow to make everything, or almost, without human intervention. The humanoids can replace us for 95 % of the tasks, while what will remain to the man?

If I want to believe in the ability of humanity to share and exceed all its faults, let us be reasonable, human history proves that there is little chance that we live in a world of Carebears where everyone would be nice and nobody would lack anything … So what about all those arms becoming too perfectly useless, I would say obsolete. How to solve the problem we could say modestly.

If we take the arguments after “environmentalists” and “transhumanists”, it seems only logical that a drastic depopulation policy would overcome the problems we face and these arguments, as odious as they are, are intellectually unstoppable. We have become too numerous, the planet can not sustain the current number of people in the current economic system, our ecological footprint is unbearable and we no longer have any need of labor. Finally, we could almost live forever, or the quest for eternity is obviously a human temptation since the dawn of time.

So of course, all this is the pure fiction…. and yet … If Mao said that a mouth to feed it was two useful arms, today he would say a mouth, it is always a mouth of excess, especially when there are 7 billions and when the arms, soon, will not be of no use any more. And Mao, the great humanist, what would he have done in such a context?

It is already too late. Get ready and stay tuned in.

Till tomorrow … if you would not mind !!

Charles SANNAT

“By trying to stifle peaceful revolutions, it makes the inevitable violent revolution” (JFK)
This is an article ‘ presslib ‘, that is free of reproduction in all or in part provided that the present paragraph is reproduced in its continuation. Contrarien Matin is an every day life (daily paper) of deciphering without concession of the economic current events published(edited) by the company Article writes by Charles SANNAT, director of the economic studies. Please visit our site. You can subscribe free of charge

“The National Assembly is still hostage of Thomas Thévenoud who is still an MP. Think about it. Do not forget. “

(To protest peacefully and with humor, do not hesitate to to resume this phrase at the bottom of all your emails, your articles or your publications, there is no copyright !!)

Bjorn Wahiroos Finnish Financer


Did you like this? Share it:

War – The Scourge of Mankind

Hello Dear Reader, the trillions of pounds/dollars wasted on the killing of our brother’s and sister’s across the world is as sickening as it gets, made even worse by the fact that the poorest people everywhere are being made to pay for it ! So-called austerity measures being enforced are only affecting those that are in need of help the most whilst the fraudulent, rotten, venal, bankers, oligarchs, politicians etc; persist with their arrogant, egoistic lives, squandering their ill-gotten wealth on the very best that money can buy.

I’m incensed that those that manifacture wars are at liberty to roam across the world doing whatever they like, it’s totally unacceptable. They’re the same miscreants that lay behind, everything that they hope will bring human slavery to fruition….Agenda 21, fracking, GM foods, flouridated water, smart meter’s, 24 hr surveillance, control of the internet, you get the picture.

Here today is a heart-wrenching, eloquent letter from a dying, paralyzed US war veteran addressed to that pair of satanists, Dick Cheney and George Bush Jn; I found it at Truthstreammedia
You feel so deeply for this poor soul. How can we continue to sit back and allow such evil to flourish ? Everyone of us has a duty to stand up and be counted, to make your voice be heard, please….no one of normal intelligence and compassion for his fellow man wants war, so how come it’s so prevalent ?
Help to bring some sanity back to our glorious planet by doing whatever you can, thank you.

love to you all, Janie, xxx

“It is the growing custom to narrow control, concentrate power, disregard and disfranchise the public; and assuming that certain powers by divine right of money-raising or by sheer assumption, have the power to do as they think best without consulting the wisdom of mankind.” W.E.B. Du Bois 1868-1963 Professor, Civil Rights Activist


Submitted to Zero Hedge by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

Last March, I came across a letter written to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney from a paralyzed and dying Iraq war vet named Tomas Young. It touched me to such an extent, that I highlighted it on Liberty Blitzkrieg at the time. He died on Monday, the day before Veterans Day. If you really want to honor our nation’s soldiers, you should read the following and share it.

RIP Tomas Young.

Full letter below from Counterpunch.

My Last Words to George W. Bush and Dick Cheney

I write this letter on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War on behalf of my fellow Iraq War veterans. I write this letter on behalf of the 4,488 soldiers and Marines who died in Iraq. I write this letter on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of veterans who have been wounded and on behalf of those whose wounds, physical and psychological, have destroyed their lives. I am one of those gravely wounded. I was paralyzed in an insurgent ambush in 2004 in Sadr City. My life is coming to an end. I am living under hospice care.

I write this letter on behalf of husbands and wives who have lost spouses, on behalf of children who have lost a parent, on behalf of the fathers and mothers who have lost sons and daughters and on behalf of those who care for the many thousands of my fellow veterans who have brain injuries. I write this letter on behalf of those veterans whose trauma and self-revulsion for what they have witnessed, endured and done in Iraq have led to suicide and on behalf of the active-duty soldiers and Marines who commit, on average, a suicide a day. I write this letter on behalf of the some 1 million Iraqi dead and on behalf of the countless Iraqi wounded. I write this letter on behalf of us all—the human detritus your war has left behind, those who will spend their lives in unending pain and grief.

How can the parents of these young men allow them to sign up to kill ?

I write this letter, my last letter, to you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney. I write not because I think you grasp the terrible human and moral consequences of your lies, manipulation and thirst for wealth and power. I write this letter because, before my own death, I want to make it clear that I, and hundreds of thousands of my fellow veterans, along with millions of my fellow citizens, along with hundreds of millions more in Iraq and the Middle East, know fully who you are and what you have done. You may evade justice but in our eyes you are each guilty of egregious war crimes, of plunder and, finally, of murder, including the murder of thousands of young Americans—my fellow veterans—whose future you stole.

Your positions of authority, your millions of dollars of personal wealth, your public relations consultants, your privilege and your power cannot mask the hollowness of your character. You sent us to fight and die in Iraq after you, Mr. Cheney, dodged the draft in Vietnam, and you, Mr. Bush, went AWOL from your National Guard unit. Your cowardice and selfishness were established decades ago. You were not willing to risk yourselves for our nation but you sent hundreds of thousands of young men and women to be sacrificed in a senseless war with no more thought than it takes to put out the garbage.

I joined the Army two days after the 9/11 attacks. I joined the Army because our country had been attacked. I wanted to strike back at those who had killed some 3,000 of my fellow citizens. I did not join the Army to go to Iraq, a country that had no part in the September 2001 attacks and did not pose a threat to its neighbors, much less to the United States. I did not join the Army to “liberate” Iraqis or to shut down mythical weapons-of-mass-destruction facilities or to implant what you cynically called “democracy” in Baghdad and the Middle East. I did not join the Army to rebuild Iraq, which at the time you told us could be paid for by Iraq’s oil revenues. Instead, this war has cost the United States over $3 trillion. I especially did not join the Army to carry out pre-emptive war. Pre-emptive war is illegal under international law. And as a soldier in Iraq I was, I now know, abetting your idiocy and your crimes. The Iraq War is the largest strategic blunder in U.S. history. It obliterated the balance of power in the Middle East. It installed a corrupt and brutal pro-Iranian government in Baghdad, one cemented in power through the use of torture, death squads and terror. And it has left Iran as the dominant force in the region. On every level—moral, strategic, military and economic—Iraq was a failure. And it was you, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney, who started this war. It is you who should pay the consequences.

Awful reminder of the consequences of brutal wars

I would not be writing this letter if I had been wounded fighting in Afghanistan against those forces that carried out the attacks of 9/11. Had I been wounded there I would still be miserable because of my physical deterioration and imminent death, but I would at least have the comfort of knowing that my injuries were a consequence of my own decision to defend the country I love. I would not have to lie in my bed, my body filled with painkillers, my life ebbing away, and deal with the fact that hundreds of thousands of human beings, including children, including myself, were sacrificed by you for little more than the greed of oil companies, for your alliance with the oil sheiks in Saudi Arabia, and your insane visions of empire.

I have, like many other disabled veterans, suffered from the inadequate and often inept care provided by the Veterans Administration. I have, like many other disabled veterans, come to realize that our mental and physical wounds are of no interest to you, perhaps of no interest to any politician. We were used. We were betrayed. And we have been abandoned. You, Mr. Bush, make much pretense of being a Christian. But isn’t lying a sin? Isn’t murder a sin? Aren’t theft and selfish ambition sins? I am not a Christian. But I believe in the Christian ideal. I believe that what you do to the least of your brothers you finally do to yourself, to your own soul.

My day of reckoning is upon me. Yours will come. I hope you will be put on trial. But mostly I hope, for your sakes, that you find the moral courage to face what you have done to me and to many, many others who deserved to live. I hope that before your time on earth ends, as mine is now ending, you will find the strength of character to stand before the American public and the world, and in particular the Iraqi people, and beg for forgiveness.

-Thomas Young

What’s so impressive about this letter, beyond the incredible emotion and pain behind it, is the fact that Mr. Young was so prescient about so many issues. He highlighted the debacle that became the Veterans Administration scandal before it broke, and he also pointed to the dangerous power vacuum created in Baghdad before the emergence of ISIS. We lost a special soul on Monday.

Did you like this? Share it:

Foster Gamble – The Future of Money

Hello Dear Reader, here’s a very encouraging video for us, all it seems, is not lost ! There is definitely hope for the future of our beloved planet.
Foster Gamble tells us why, he’s the founder of ‘ThriveTogether’ a warm, sincere spirit with a very positive message.

The cabal’s monopoly on the world’s money supply is coming to an end, they will not go without a fight, false flags and staged events will continue until they’ve cowed the sheeple to the brink of a third world war, which is virtually where we’re at now.

But with so many thousands of peace loving, compassionate souls determined to prevent this cataclysm, things are beginning to turn in our favour.
After listening to what Foster has to say I think you’ll agree. Of course his opinions, to some, may sound a tad too optimistic, but that’s what’s so interesting about the internet, we can all arrive at our own conclusions after deliberation.

Despite all of the very negative crap filling the TV screens and paper’s, I’m feeling extremely positive, as I’ve said many times before, the human race, both individually and collectively are way too precious to disappear, we will survive ! Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“The difference between a welfare state and a totalitarian state is a matter of time.” Ayn Rand 1905-1982



Did you like this? Share it:

Monsanto’s Evil Grip Now Loosening

Hello Dear Reader, it doesn’t take a genius to realise the intrinsinc link between our food and our health, but proving it is a different matter… so when I read this article by Christina Sarich in the ‘Unfiltered News’ Newsletter today it gave me shot of optimism. Before that is a clip of Anthony Gucciardi bringing us welcome news that Monsanto are losing millions of dollars due to people demanding that GM foods to be labelled (this news broke recently).


The unbelievably high rate of cases of dementia and other neurological diseases in countries across the world are making ‘Big Pharma’ copious amounts of dosh daily. So what do they care about any one of us or our loved ones falling victim to these unnecessary, cruel, disorders. The tactics used by some of the vilest men/women on the planet that propogate the lies surrounding this unexplained rise to silence whistleblowers and conscientious reporters of the truth, knows no bounds.

The lily-livered media never, ever ask the question WHY ? Why is this happenening on such an unprecented scale ? What is the CAUSE ? No, just like the many prominent medical professionals, they just talk about the symptons and the cure !!! Never the CAUSE.

Back in 2008, David Icke wrote a brilliant piece on Monsanto entitled ‘The Food Crisis” which I’ve uncovered for you, a great read. I encourage you to research for yourself, there’s some astounding information available.

Fructose, (mostly, genetically modified sugar) is a leading contributor for the alarming increase in obesity….when you eat 120 calories of glucose (natural sugars) less than one calorie is stored as fat. 120 calories of fructose results in 40 calories being stored as fat.
Consuming fructose is essentailly consuming fat !


The food chain is such a vital conduit for mind control and DNA manipulation, we have only scratched the surface, but we are becoming more savvy by the day, we truly are a force to be reckoned with, this is why King Cameron keeps banging on about tightening internet security using the very boring excuse of “fighting terrorism”. Get a grip man, WE DON’T BElIEVE ANYTHING YOU SAY.

Also the perverts in high places must be choking on their kedgeree today as UK newspaper’s reported that a new investigation into paedophilia and homicides is underway. It’s only a matter of time now until we are told who they are. I’ll keep you posted.

Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“The genetic modification of food is intrisically dangerous. It involves making irreversible changes in a random manner to a complex level of life about which little is known. It is inevitable that this hit-and-miss approach will lead to disasters. It must disrupt the natural intelligence of the plant or animal to which it is applied, and lead to health-damaging side-effects.” Dr Geoffrey Clements, leader of the Natural Law Party, UK.

A new correlation study published in the Journal of Organic Systems has linked glyphosate, the primary ingredient in Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide, Roundup, to an enormous increase in chronic diseases across the United States.


Supporting countless studies before it, this new report is a detailed analysis proving an undeniable link between glyphosate-based herbicides and the rates of chronic disease all over the country.

Dr. Nancy Swanson and the President of the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Andre Leu, led the research team which proved – once again – that glyphosate and Roundup are lethal, even in small amounts.

The chemical is prevalently used on crops across the nation and world. Friends of the Earth Europe, says that more than 650,000 tonnes of glyphosate products were used over five years ago, with the amount being used increasing each year.

This increase in use is contributing to the development of diseases such as diabetes, obesity, lipoprotein metabolism disorder, Alzheimer’s, senile dementia, Parkinson’s, multiple sclerosis, autism, and cancer. The report details how there is a direct correlation between the incidence of these diseases and glyphosate use.


It isn’t as if the toxicity levels of glyphosate are not already known by its makers. Monsanto was refusing to release to the public lab tests conducted in St. Louis, Missouri, which gave them authority to use glyphosate in China.

This is the company that is responsible for making PCBs, DD.T and Agent Orange as well, all of which caused irreparable health damage ignored by regulators for decades.

Glyphosate-based herbicides have been identified as the next widely used chemical on a list of chemicals consumers should be aware of.

Read: 7 Nasty Effects of Pesticides


The world’s number one weed killer, Glyphosate, or N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, is posing serious harm to humans and the environment, yet the poison developed by John E. Franz of the Monsanto Company has been allowed on the US market since the 1970s.

It isn’t just Monsanto who sells glyphosate, though. There are now over 100 different manufacturers of the product throughout the world. You can find it in other products with names such as Clearout 41.

Although glyphosate is used primarily in agricultural settings, it is also sprayed by public authorities on roads and pavements. Even managers of golf courses and home gardeners still use the toxic chemicals to control weeds.

According to the new study:

“Within the last 20 years there has been an alarming increase in serious illnesses in the US, along with a marked decrease in life expectancy (Bezruchka, 2012). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that the cost of diabetes and diabetes-related treatment was approximately $116 billion dollars in 2007.

Estimated costs related to obesity were $147 billion in 2008 and cardiovascular diseases and stroke were $475.3 billion in 2009. Health care expenditures in the US totaled 2.2 trillion dollars in 2007 (CDC, 2013a). The onset of serious illness is appearing in increasingly younger cohorts. The US leads the world in the increase in deaths due to neurological diseases between 1979-81 and 2004-06 for the 55-65 age group (Pritchard et al., 2013).”
The study points out that, “these findings suggest environmental triggers rather than genetic or age-related causes,” especially since chronic diseases are showing up in younger and younger individuals.

“During this same time period, there has been an exponential increase in the amount of glyphosate applied to food crops and in the percentage of GE food crops planted (Benbrook, 2012). We undertook a study to see if correlations existed between the rise of GE crops, the associated glyphosate use and the rise in chronic disease in the US.”
The bottom line?

“The significance and strength of the correlations show that the effects of glyphosate and GE crops on human health should be further investigated.”
Additional Sources:

Copyright David Icke, 2008. All Rights Reserved.

David Icke Newsletter, June 22nd, 2008




Hello all …

It was only a matter of time, as the clock ticked ever louder … tick … ‘food crisis’ … tock … ‘food shortages’ … tick … ‘rising prices’ … tock … ‘hunger’ … tick … here we go … ‘GM crops could solve global food crisis’.

A UK Environment Minister called Phil Woolas said this week:

‘There is a growing question of whether GM crops can help the developing world out of the current food price crisis. It is a question that we as a nation need to ask ourselves. The debate is already under way. Many people concerned about poverty in the developing world and the environment are wrestling with this issue.’

Well, actually, ‘Woolly’, no they’re not, as the outcry at those words from environmental and aid groups can testify. Woolas is just another dark-suit-in-government peddling the mendacity of Monsanto, the truly heartless and soulless Illuminati abomination leading the cartel behind the genetically-modified agenda.

Monsanto, based in the Illuminati fiefdom of St Louis, has already conquered North America with its Frankenstein food, not least because of the spinning door that connects Monsanto executives with government appointments. The number of Monsanto employees hired by government, or vice-versa, is extraordinary in itself and they are overwhelmingly appointed to positions that need to be controlled to advance the Monsanto plan to monopolise global food supplies.

Now, given that background, it is hardly a shock to find out that our mate, ‘Woolly’, the Environment Minister, has been meeting recently with the Agricultural Biotechnology Council or ‘ABC’. This, I take it, stands for ‘Advancing Bollocks Constantly’ because that is what it does. See the ‘ABC’ website …

The ‘ABC’ is an ‘umbrella organisation’ set up by, and representing the interests of, the Biotech giants of BASF, Bayer CropScience, Dow AgroSciences, Pioneer (DuPont), Monsanto and Syngenta. Its chairman is Dr. Julian Little of Bayer CropScience (Bayer was part of I.G. Farben that ran the concentration camp at Auschwitz) and the deputy chairman is Dr Colin Merritt of, yes, of course, Monsanto.

They seem to have programmed old Woolly rather well, although, to be fair, the resistance would have been low.

‘Woolly’ Woolas: Biotech Buddy


The quality, integrity and intellect of government ministers worldwide, and politicians in general, has been falling like a turbo-charged stone. As the corporations, and the shadow cartel controlling the corporations, have seized ever more power they have placed millions of useless (but to them useful) idiots in the high and low positions of government and public administration.

‘Woolly’ appears to me to be a classic air-headed career politician who says ‘woof, woof’ to anyone who can enhance his status or sense of importance. I may be doing him a disservice because I have never met him, but all the warning signs are there and it seems to me that the greatest disservice playing out here is the one he is inflicting on the population he is supposed to be serving.

His voting record in Parliament says it all. He voted AGAINST transparent government; FOR identity cards; FOR the invasion of Iraq; and AGAINST an investigation into the invasion after ‘weapons of mass destruction’ were not found.

What makes such people all the more pathetic is that had his then leader, Tony Blair, told him something different he would have voted the opposite way on all those issues without a second thought. These people are nothing more than sock-puppets to their ‘superiors’ and their ‘superiors’ are sock-puppets to the corporations and the secret societies that control them. This is how the few can dictate the voting tendencies of entire parliaments.

Phil Woolas and Tony Blair: the Sock-Puppet Two

It’s the Woollys of this world that make the Illuminati job so easy because all you have to do is control those theoretically at the top of the political pyramid and the Woollys bow their heads on command to their leader. For the Biotech cartel, the Woollys are a synch, mere babes in arms, who are looked upon with contempt by those who flatter them to their face.

It’s been so blatant from the start that it was UK government policy to follow North America and open the floodgates to GM farming, but Tony Blair, or Biotech Man, encountered fierce opposition from pressure groups and public and even he, corrupt to his fingertips, couldn’t force it through.

Blair has now gone, to be replaced by an utter incompetent called Gordon Brown, but the same policies plough on because the same people who controlled Blair dictate to Brown. Either Brown is under serious mind-control or they know something about him that he seriously doesn’t want made public because the fear that emanates from him can be seen in every fibre of his being whenever a key Illuminati policy is a danger of not getting through.

One such policy is the introduction of GM food and so they are now planning to have another go at it, with Woolly being dropped from the battlements to test the waters.

He will have done no research, just listened to the Biotech giants and the civil servants in his department controlled by the biotech giants; he has no idea of the global Orwellian agenda and he will think that he is actually important and has power because he has some title or other in the governmental hierarchy.

Woolly, as with his like across the world, is just fodder, a useful idiot to advance a strategy he has not a clue even exists.


The scale of GM crops in 2004 – there’s massively more now.

So, Woolly, let me do your job for you, no fee required.

The game playing out with the ‘food crisis’ is aimed at controlling food supplies throughout the world. To control the masses you need to use fear and dependency and the hijacking of food gives you both. It is said that when you get them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow, and the same goes for their stomachs. As Henry Kissinger said in the 1970s:

‘Control the oil and you can control entire continents. Control food and you control people …’

The double-edged sword they are using to achieve this is GM crops, which they can patent, and the ownership of seed varieties in the seed banks, which they are also patenting ever faster. Because the same force controls governments and the corporations, the two work as one to bring about the desired end.

For example, one of the most active funders of GM research has been the Rockefeller Foundation, owned by one of the most prominent Illuminati families on the planet. The Rockefellers control not only the activities of the US government, but many others throughout the world in league with their connected bloodlines, secret societies and corporations.

It was the Rockefeller-controlled Reagan-Bush administration in the early 1980s that funded the development of so-called ‘suicide seeds’ or ‘terminator seeds’ that die after a single use and cannot be re-used to produce seeds for the next year’s harvest.

These are designed to turn farmers and whole nations into slaves of the seed corporations. Willard Phelps, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said the aim of ‘suicide seed’ research was to establish the widest possible use of terminator seeds ‘to increase the value of proprietary seed owned by U.S. seed companies and to open up new markets in Second and Third World countries’.

Cut away the bullshit and this is what you get: Farmers trying to eek out an existence for their families on small plots in the poorest countries become dependent on the seed corporations who are forcing them to buy from them every year – or starve.

What’s more, the biotech varieties require biotech fertilisers and other chemicals – so increasing the dependency still further.

‘Have the Monsanto seeds arrived yet, Daddy?’

The ‘suicide seeds’ were developed with taxpayer money in a joint operation between the United States government and a company called Delta and Pine Land which was reported to have had a rather famous investor – Queen Elizabeth II. The largest shareholder has been the Stephens Group in Arkansas, controlled by Jackson Stephens, the major bankroller of Bill Clinton’s deeply corrupt political career and also extremely close to the Bush family.

In August 2006, it was announced that Delta and Pine had agreed a $1.5 billion deal to sell its operation and terminator seed patents (developed with taxpayer money) to … Monsanto.

As the corporations impose their patented laboratory crops through moronic pawns like Woolly Woolas, so they are embarked on a massive assault on the varieties they don’t control. This involves destroying most of them and patenting what’s left. Ninety-seven per cent of the vegetables grown at the start of the 20th century are now extinct. Only four varieties of potato are now grown on any scale when once there were 5,000.

From the mid-1990s, pesticide and chemical producers, notably Monsanto and Dow, began to buy the seed producers. Monsanto spent some eight billion dollars alone and Dr. Charles M Benbrook, former Board of Agriculture Director at the Academy of Sciences, said: ‘Basically, the U.S. pesticide industry bought the seed industry for all intents and purposes’. The intent and purpose was to control food production.

The law was changed still further to allow the corporations to patent seed varieties that they have NOT genetically engineered. The only criteria was that no-one else had got there first. This led to the corporations taking the seeds from the seed banks designed to protect genetic diversity and going to the patent office to register ownership. It is reckoned that Monsanto alone owns more than 11,000 seeds – and rising.

The World Bank, International Monetary Fund and World Trade Organisation are controlled by the families that control the biotech corporations and together they are working to the following end. They are already a long way down this road:

* Global dependency on Illuminati corporations for seeds.

* Global dependency on Illuminati corporations for the pesticides, herbicides and fertilisers to make the seeds grow or survive.

* Global dependency on Illuminati supermarkets which have destroyed independent stores and dictate the price they will pay to farmers.

* Global dependency on Illuminati corporations for virtually everything that we eat or drink.

And dependency = control.

Look how far this has now gone. As one writer pointed out this week, only five corporations, all based in the United States, control the global grain trade, and five control the world trade in seeds – Monsanto, Syngenta, Bayer, DuPont, and Dow Chemicals. These are the corporations that make up the Agricultural Biotechnology Council or ‘ABC’, which had the ear of Woolly Woolas before he made his ludicrous statement about GM crops.

The Illuminati cartel, which also controls the oil producers and suppliers, as I outlined last week, is now instigating a world ‘food crisis’ to allow the biotech corporations to offer their long-time agenda as the solution.

‘Listennnn to my vooooice, you are feeling very tired … GM crops will solve the food crisis … what will they do, Gordon?

‘They will solve the food crisis, sir …’

‘Good boy, Gordon, good boy …’

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown pressed the European Union this week to relax regulations on GM animal feed ‘in an attempt to cut spiralling food prices’ and Jose Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission, said EU leaders must ‘bite the bullet’ and ‘embrace GM products as a solution to rocketing food prices’.

It’s all a Problem-Reaction-Solution scam.

They claim that genetically-modified crops are needed to ‘feed the world’ when they will actually destroy food supplies and lead hundreds of millions, eventually billions, into starvation.

Oh yes, the deaths of millions, eventually billions. There is another aspect to this, highlighted it would seem in a book by F. William Engdahl called Seeds of Destruction. In this, he apparently connects all that I have described here with the plan for a vast reduction in the human population and that is certainly part of what we are seeing unfold.

Add to this the fact that genetically-modified food is designed to genetically-modify the human body-computer and you are looking at one of the major weapons in the war against human freedom.

These deeply-sick people want you to see pictures like this …

… because it understandably horrifies our emotions and has the potential to open us to the ‘solution’ on offer – ‘GM crops could solve global food crisis’. We must not buy this propaganda, for it will lead us into a food production catastrophe, exactly as planned.

The reality is this: those who cause most of the hunger and starvation are the very same people who are telling us what we must do to stop it. Monsanto, the producer of Agent Orange, the mass killer ‘herbicide’ sprayed without mercy during the Vietnam War, cares about starving children?? Are you friggin’ kidding??

So there you go, Woolly. Still think that GM crops are a good idea when the only beneficiaries are the biotech corporations and the agenda for global enslavement?

You do?

Thought so.

Did you like this? Share it:

Munchausen Syndrom by Proxy: A Fake Psychiatric Disorder

Hello Dear Reader, the ‘Establishment” paedophile cover up here in the UK is an absolute disgrace, Cameron even suggested that those who querie what they’ve been told are into conspiracy !!! If the disappearance of 141 documents listing the names of (some) still active MP’s directly involved in paedophilia, from the Home Office itself isn’t a conspiracy then God help us. They really do think we’re too dumbed down to do anything about it.

Also, the demonising of Vladimir Putin continues, hardly a word of truth is being reported about the Ukraine in the media, shame on you reporter’s/journalist’s.

And earlier today on RT News I heard that police in Paris were protesting against low wages etc; and that the people surrounded them and used some of the tactics generally used by the police themselves when dealing with protester’s against the protesting police ! But I can’t find any clips for you ! Not even on RT, don’t know why.


But today’s post is about the very real and tragic cost of vaccinations. Doctor’s, Nurses, please search your souls before giving the advice to the vunerable, trusting parents that vaccines are safe…. THEY ARE NOT, do the research before filling tiny, innocent bodies with unprecedented amounts of toxins. Below is the very sad story of one such child, unfortunately there are now hundred’s of thousand’s of babies/children suffering needlessly all to fill quotas and keep Big Pharma raking in the dollars. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“After a careful consideration of the history of vaccination gleaned from an impartial and comprehensive study of vital statistics, and pertinent data from every reliable source, and after an experience derived from having vaccinated 31,000 subjects, I am firmly convinced that vaccination cannot be shown to have any logical relation to the diminution of cases of smallpox. Vaccination does not protect, it actually renders its subjects more susceptible by depressing the vital power and diminishing the natural resistance, and millions of people have died of smallpox which they contracted after being vaccinated” J.W.Hodge MD in his book “The Vaccination Superstition”

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: A Fake Psychiatric Disorder Used to Medically Kidnap Children?

Ella Dis
Ella Dis. Her mother reports that after months of fighting to get her daughter back after a medical kidnapping due to a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy diagnosis against her, the child died.

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: The Medical Profession’s Get Out of Jail Free Card?

by Christina England
Health Impact News

In Memory of Ella Dis – Born 2nd January 2006 – Died 5th June 2014

Over the years I have highlighted a growing number of cases in which the parents of children injured by a vaccine have subsequently been falsely accused of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy (MSBP.)

One of the most poignant of cases for me was the case of Ella Dis. [1]

Ella began life as a normal, cheeky, healthy little girl, who enjoyed toddling around and playing with her toys. Sadly all this was to change dramatically soon after she received her eight week routine vaccinations.

Within hours of the vaccinations Ella became weak and feverish, refusing feeds. Worried, her mother Ragna Erlendsdóttir took her daughter to the local hospital where doctors assured her that she had picked up a virus and would be fine.

Not connecting the illness to the vaccinations, and blissfully unaware that this was only the beginning of her daughter’s problems, Ragna took her baby home.


As the months went by, after each vaccination Ella became ill. Convinced that by giving her baby the routine vaccinations she was doing the best that she could do for her child, and on the advice given to her by her doctor, she continued to allow her daughter to receive the vaccinations.

Ragna stated:

“It never occurred to me that her problems could be linked to the vaccinations. I had no one around to tell me about the possible side-effects of vaccines.”
Sadly, Ella’s real problems only became apparent after she received the MMR vaccination at 13 months. Up until this age she had been developing normally, she was beginning to walk and talk, was alert and was reaching all her developmental milestones. After the MMR vaccine however, Ella became very sick indeed after an extremely bad reaction.

Connecting the Dots Between Vaccine Injuries and Deteriorating Health

By this time Ragna was beginning to connect the dots and was waking up to the realization that it was the vaccinations that were causing her daughter’s problems. Sadly, it was too late for little Ella, as the damage was done.

Over the months Ella began to deteriorate with each day. By 2008 at the tender age of two, she was unable to breathe on her own, and was taken to the PICU (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit).
Ragna stated:

“Shortly after that, the neurologist told me that he thought that Ella had a disease, but he had no proof for the diagnosis, so nothing further was done. I was devastated, fearing that my baby was going to die. I fell into the darkness of hopelessness and sorrow, so that I spent weeks as if in a daze. I don’t know what happened, but after two months something in my heart told me that Ella was not to die. Not like this, and not without knowing what was making her so sick. I felt I must carry on, and that I was to get a second opinion. We took her to the best specialists in the UK. They did many tests, but still no answers!!”
Beginning to realize that the vaccinations were the problem, Ragna’s instincts told her to not allow Ella to have any further vaccinations.

However, as we all know, doctors can be extremely persuasive. When you are alone and frightened, and needing to trust doctors with your child’s life, it is easy to believe what they are telling you. Sadly, against Ragna’s better judgement, Ella was given the flu vaccine. She immediately became much worse.

Ella. Diagnosed by physicians as suffering from Vaccine Induced Disease.

Physicians Diagnose Ella’s Condition as Vaccine Induced Disease

Ragna relayed what happened next:

“Next day her eyes started to move rapidly from side to side, like nystagmus. Her body lost blood without any reason, and she needed a blood transfusion of 500ml. She got very sick, and my poor baby almost died. BUT then it was like an invisible voice and guidance that led me to the possibility that this illness of hers was very likely from the jabs, so I started to think back and everything became clear to me. Namely, that her symptoms were the serious side-effects of vaccinations!”
In a desperate bid to discover the truth, Ragna traveled far and wide to find answers for her daughter. Each time the doctors explained to Ragna that Ella’s condition had been caused through VID or Vaccine Induced Disease.

She managed to get reports from four leading experts from around the world stating that Ella had been damaged by vaccinations.


Here are some excerpts from those reports:

Report 1 was written by Sverrir Bergman MD, DM Consultant Neurologist – March 2010

My diagnosis of Ella ———— d.o.b. ——-.2006 condition is on clinical grounds but supported by some investigation as being that of motor sensory polyneuropathy and involving the brain stem nerves as well as the pheripheral ones. This has been accepted by others before my involvement in this case and Ella —— was subsequently given treatment with immunoglobulins and steroids. To me most likely autoimmune response following vaccination. Suggestive diagnosis of some form of spinal muscular atrophy was never confirmed and later rejected.
Report 2 was written by Shimon Slavin, MD, Professor of Medicine, Medical & Scientific Director The International Center for Cell Therapy & Cancer Immunotherapy.

Currently the patient is totally paralyzed with control only over her eyes and eyelids. Today she is on 24hr assistance with BiPAP breathing.
The patient was seen by various experts and her clinical condition does not fit any known classical neurological syndrome. However, careful anamnesis and the development of her symptoms following vaccination suggest a high probability that her current condition may be the consequence of vaccination induced damage syndrome (VIDS).

In view of a lack of any better suggestion for diagnosis it appears to me that the option of VIDS is very likely the cause of her unusual condition.
Report 3 was written by Sverrir Bergman MD, DM Consultant Neurologist – December 2011

I enclose a copy of my report on Ella ——-. She is severely affected by what is most likely the result of motorsensory neuropathy following immunization. There is much weakness of the limbs and the body, but her brain stem nerves are also affected, and she requires direct gastric feeding and breathing assistance which is not sufficient for her now, and she requires tracheotomy as there is much swelling in her laryngeal region.
Report 4 was written by Harold Buttram MD

Ella ——- I have been gratified to find that hospital and consulting physicians unanimously agreed that Ella —————-’ autoimmune illness was the result of routine childhood vaccines, with the MMR vaccine being the final agent of incapacitation.
Medical Kidnap: Ella is Removed from Mother’s Custody via Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Diagnosis

Despite all this evidence, and with Ella so desperately ill and disabled, the authorities decided that Ella was not vaccine damaged at all. In their report, they said that she was suffering from ‘spinal muscular atrophy,’ a condition that had already been disregarded in the first expert’s report.

In a desperate bid to quieten Ella’s mother, the authorities used their trump card and accused Ragna of MSBP. They stated that she had endangered Ella’s life by travelling to different experts around the world for assessments, answers and treatments not available in the UK.

Despite the evidence backing up their claims, Ella was removed from her mother’s care and put into an institution for the disabled.

Ella Finally Returns Home to Die

After many months of fighting the authorities and several court cases, Ella was returned to her mother.

Sadly, their joy of being reunited was short lived. Not long after Ella retuned home to be with her loving family, she died suddenly.

Ella was a beautiful little girl whom I was so very fortunate to meet. She lit up the whole room with her beautiful smile and will be sadly missed by all those who knew her.

What is Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy?

MSBP is a diagnosis given to a parent or caregiver to describe certain aspects of their behaviour. This behaviour usually includes subjecting what appears to be a previously healthy child to unnecessary painful tests or medical interventions, such as scans, x-rays and surgical procedures, to gain the attention of the medical profession.

Many theories exist as to why women/men would fabricate fictitious illness in their children. The most common theory is that the perpetrators have a personality disorder. Louisa J. Lasher and Mary S. Sheridan wrote in Munchausen by Proxy – Identification, Intervention and Case Management, on page 293, point 3:

““MBP perpetrators may seek attention from a variety of people.” As already indicated, this need for attention in one form or another is characteristic of several personality disorders. Those with borderline or dependent personality disorder have a strong need for relationships. The core of histrionic personality disorder is the need for attention from others. People with paranoid personality disorder may seek attention to confirm beliefs or even make ‘converts.’ People with antisocial personality disorder may seek attention as part of a ‘con.’” (2)
No Consistent Agreement on MSBP Diagnosis Among Authorities

In fact, there is little professional agreement on what constitutes a MSBP diagnosis and many professionals describe MSBP as different things. There have been debates all over the world on the subject. Some say that it is a mental illness, while others say that it doesn’t even exist.

Dr. Marc Feldman, thought to be a leading expert on the subject, believes that MSBP does exist. He describes what he believes to be the behavior of a person suffering from the condition on his website:

“…….They deliberately mislead others into thinking they (or their children) have serious medical or psychological problems, often resulting in extraordinary numbers of medication trials, diagnostic tests, hospitalizations, and even surgery … that they know are not really needed. In short, factitious disorder, Munchausen syndrome, malingering, and Munchausen by proxy involve illness deception, or ‘disease forgery.’” (3)
In another article by Feldman, Parenthood Betrayed, the Dilemma of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, Feldman explains that MSBP mothers need to feel special and that virtually all have personality disorders. (4)

A Growing Number of Professionals Disagree with Dr. Feldman – State that MSBP Lacks Scientific Validity

Earl Howe, the former opposition spokesperson for children and health in the House of Lords, disagrees with this opinion fiercely.

In 2004, Lord Howe was reported to have said that he feels there is a sinister development occurring in the UK, with MSBP being confined to the “dustbin” and doctors replacing it with the term “personality disorder”, adding:

“This has the same result as MSBP; it is a catch-all term to accuse mothers.” (5)
Michael Nott agrees. Originally a journalist writing a series of papers and articles on MSBP in the early 2000’s, he has recently qualified as a lawyer and is fast becoming one of the leading professionals helping parents who have been falsely accused.

In one of his early papers, he wrote:

“A Munchausen syndrome by proxy diagnosis lacks scientific validity. It is not a definitive category in the authoritative DSM IV (1994), only appearing in the appendix.

Parents and professionals should be aware that there are many similar labels to MSBP, which include the following: somatisation disorder, abnormal illness behaviour, folie a deux, pervasive refusal syndrome, hysteria, and factitious illness. Often the MSBP label will be combined with other labels. For example, a mother may be accused of both MSBP and shaken baby syndrome.

It is a recent and extremely controversial diagnosis (Allison and Roberts, 1998). Despite its highly controversial nature, MSBP is being used extensively in the medical profession, by social services, and in court.” [6]
Charles Pragnell, an independent social care management consultant, Child/Family Advocate, and an Expert Defense Witness – Child Protection, is another professional who agrees. In his paper A Misconceived and Misguided Medical and Social Construction he wrote:

“Denial of fault where error or negligence has led to harm to another person and which has been caused by an individual or an organization, is encouraged by insurance companies. They instruct motorists never to admit fault after a motoring `accident’ and have even instructed local government departments not to admit fault where individuals have suffered harm as a consequence of the actions of their employees. The Glaswegian defence of the `WazNaaMe Syndrome’ is very common.

In this context, FII/MSBP has become a very clever device for medical and other professionals to avert blame for their incompetence or negligence as it immediately throws blame onto the parent (usually the mother), and identifies the parent immediately as being capable of gross deceit and misrepresentation.

A defense by a parent against such an accusation by a powerful and respected professional is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to disprove. The parent is labelled, stigmatised, and completely disempowered in a moment. In most cases the professional is not required to even prove their accusation. It is sufficient that they merely mention their accusation at a meeting with other professionals who are reluctant to challenge such an assertion and readily accept its authenticity and to thereafter apply it in their contacts and practices with the parent.” [7]
However, despite the growing controversy, medical professionals worldwide continue to support the MSBP diagnosis, with many believing that parents and caregivers who suffer from the syndrome can be identified using a profile.

How a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy Profile is Used to Trap Parents in a “No-win” Situation

Dr. Helen Hayward-Brown has been very worried about the use of profiling parents for MSBP for many years, and was reported to have said that:

“The MSBP profile used by doctors contains paradoxes that make it very difficult, almost impossible, for mothers to prove their innocence. For example, being an over-protective parent is part of the MSBP profile, but so is being a negligent parent.” (8)
She has a point and has explained on many occasions how parents can be trapped into a no-win situation. She frequently uses the example of how being an over-protective parent can be used against parents but adds, that so, too, can being a negligent parent.

Earl Howe, former Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State and government spokesperson with the Department of Health has also expressed his concerns surrounding the MSBP profile. In October 2001, he outlined his concerns during a Parliamentary discussion at the House of Lords:

“The danger of such a broad spectrum of behaviour being packaged into a single portmanteau term, MSBP, is that in the hands of those who are not sufficiently trained or experienced to know better, it is a label that is all too easily applied without due care.

This is all the more true when one considers the so-called profile of characteristics that are said to mark out a person suffering from MSBP. These characteristics include such things as privation during childhood, repeated bereavement, miscarriage, divorce and past health problems.

An over-intense relationship with the child and a desire to be the perfect parent are other supposed markers. Regardless of the fact that there are very many perfectly innocent, sane people around who might have such characteristics, the very idea of a tell-tale profile of this kind is an open invitation to apply the MSBP label without properly looking at what may or may not be happening to the child. [9]
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy a Cover for Vaccine Injury

The first ever professional to link Munchhausen Syndrome by Proxy, autism and vaccinations together was psychologist, author and specialist in autism Lisa Blakemore-Brown. She first began speaking out about her fears and concerns regarding MSBP in 1995. She stated:

“In my first false case the twins I assessed had been born at just over 26 weeks in the mid eighties. They were tiny babies with horrendous complications. The evidence that such premature infants go on to have developmental problems including attention deficits, motor and social impairments is now indisputable, but it was tossed to one side in this MSBP case. One of the early troubling issues for me was that the MSBP accusers initially totally denied that these children had such birth complications! They said this was ‘what the mother said’ and that I had been ‘beguiled’ by ‘listening to the mother.’” [10]
In 1997, Ms. Blakemore-Brown was featured in a 20/20 documentary on the case, aired in New Zealand. It is very clear in part 2 of the film that the twins had severe problems.

In the same year Ms. Blakemore-Brown wrote a paper in the journal The Therapist, titled False Illness in Children – Or Simply False Accusations? [11]

Her paper describes a tragic case which she had been involved with concerning a child who had developed a dangerously high fever immediately after routine vaccinations. Shortly after, the child began to bang his head, soil himself, and lose all his language ability. After many investigations, the child was diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome.

The mother began to suspect that the vaccinations were the root of the child’s problems and decided not to have her other children vaccinated. As time went on, she became desperate for help. She turned to the social services and begged them for respite care because she was finding her elder son difficult to manage. Instead of the help which this mother so badly needed, she was accused of MSBP and her children were taken away from her.

In foster care, the youngest child, a little girl, was vaccinated against the will of her mother. Instantaneously, and tragically, her behaviour deteriorated in the same way as her brother’s, only this time the foster mother had videotapes of before and after vaccinations, to prove the timing of the changes. Despite this evidence, both the younger children were placed into a new family.

Despite her courageous efforts and the controversy surrounding the MSBP diagnosis, parents are still being falsely diagnosed today.

Conclusion: False Accusations of Child Abuse Destroy Lives

These tragedies will keep on occurring until the medical profession accepts that vaccinations can and do cause disabilities, illness and death. Doctors in particular need to STOP, THINK and CHECK before blaming parents. Not all parents wish to harm their children.

When children are taken to the doctors with difficult to diagnose illnesses and disabilities, doctors should always ask their parents about their vaccination status and find out when the child received their last vaccination. This action could save the child’s life.

False accusations of child abuse destroy lives and can rip a loving family apart.

Think before you act!!

Written in loving memory of Ella Dis

Read the full article and comment at


1. (2012) England. Christina Child Paralyzed by Vaccinations and Stolen from Mother by State

2. 1. Louisa J Lasher and Mary S Sheridan. Munchausen by Proxy – Identification, Intervention and Case Management page 293 point 3 (Link)

3. Feldman Marc – Munchausen Syndrome, Malingering, Factitious Disorder, & Munchausen by Proxy Page

4. Feldman – Parenthood Betrayed, The Dilemma of Munchausen by Proxy

5. Nott Michael – Justice out of Balance

6. (2004) Nott. Michael What is Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy?


8. Nott Michael – Justice out of Balance

9. (2001) Howe. Fredrick. Lord Hansard Parliamentry Business Child Abuse

10. Durham Speech Profitable Harm – Autism odyssey. Retrieved from

11. (1998). False illness in children – or simply false accusations? The Therapist, 5(2). Re-trieved from Original obtainable from here

– See more at:

Did you like this? Share it: