Get Adobe Flash player

The Sinister Side of Uber

Hello Dear Reader, continuing on from my post on ‘Uber’ it turns out our suspicions are completely justified. Natural News have compiled the following information about just how sinister this ‘overnight sensation’ really is and it’s not funny. Their app monitors your every move even when it’s not in use. It’s exactly what truth speakers have been warning everyone about for years, well it’s definitely here now.

As soon as you learn that incredibly rich bankers are sponsoring something you automatically know it’s beyond dodgy. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall at this year’s bilderberg soiree in Austria, one of the chosen few to attend was Dame Anne Dowling
Professor of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cambridge.
Ann Dowling became the first female Professor in the Engineering Department of the University of Cambridge in 1998. She is currently the Department’s Head and is an authority on aircraft noise. She has worked at Cambridge since 1977, but also held posts at the MIT (1999-2000) and Caltech (2001).
of Mechanical Engineering, University of Cambridge

She is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering and was made a Fellow of the Royal Society in 2003. She holds an honorary ScD degree from Trinity College Dublin. She was appointed CBE in 2002 and a DBE for services to Science in 2007.

The reason why I think this is interesting is that she’s involved in advanced technology which is exactly what Uber is, I don’t know if there’s a direct connection to her work and Uber but time will tell eh.

In one of the newspapers today was a small mention of a fifteen year old boy who has chosen to inject himself with a microchip !!! What a brilliant job ‘they”ve done on the young eh, they cannot believe ‘thier’ luck, that in this day and age when most of us are informed about the dire consequences of becoming a microchipped population that there are youngster’s such as this (BryanWake) offering themselves as cyborgs !!!
There are quite a few willing recipients of this technology already, the mind boggles.

Here now is a snippet from someone discussing the latest Call of Duty Warfare video game, I didn’t copy the accompanying youtube, too boring, but he’s saying essentially, what I’ve posted about previously that super soldiers are definitely part of ‘their’ arsenal being used across the world.

“YouTube user TheLongSensation has posted a video that, according to his own sources and research, may well point towards some features of the game. If his information is to be believed, Black Ops 3 will feature a unit of soldiers from the EVO, Evolved Variable Operator, Program. A program that augments and replaces body parts with cybernetics to create superior soldiers.
Some of these augmentations are thought to allow dashing and sliding, think Vanquish, but they won’t allow for boost assisted jumping, see Call of Duty Advanced Warfare. Other augmentations will allow the EVO soldier to take more damage and survive in dangerous environments, possibly even receive boosted strength. Plot supposition stretches into using the “How far are we willing to go” line as the central pillar for the game, presumably meaning how far does an EVO soldier go before they’re not human.”

Here’s a video further explaining the scientific basis of cybernetics, there are numerous videos out there but the radio hosts or talk show hosts have such huge ego’s that you have to endure their endless prattle and horrible tastes in music before they get to the nitty gritty ! drives me mad, all I want is to hear the subject matter, please take heed when recording you guys.

Love to you all, Janie, xxx

““Technology – with all its promise and potential – has gotten so far beyond human control that its threatening the future of humankind.” Kim J. Vicente

Uber is your Big Brother: It tracks you everywhere, even when you’re not using the Uber app


(NaturalNews) Uber, the popular mobile ride-finding app, has been at the center of controversy since its launch in 2009. Much of the uproar has been due to the fact that its low-cost ride service poses a direct threat to the livelihood of cab drivers and other professional drivers who claim that the competition is unfair, unethical and downright illegal. In March 2015, Brussels cab drivers went on strike in protest of the Uber service, and since then, there has been increasing pressure on the company regarding its practices.

In June, the debate reached a fever pitch when taxi drivers in France staged anti-Uber demonstrations that turned violent, leading to a raid by police on the Uber headquarters in Paris and the detainment of two Uber executives for questioning.

However, there is another issue with the Uber smartphone app that has raised serious concerns among the public and various privacy groups: Uber tracks and records information regarding the location of passengers who use the service even when the app is not in use.

In the first years of its operations, Uber came under fire over charges that the company had “casually” used the information it gathered with its “God View” technology, which gives the company the capability of monitoring the location of all its drivers as well as users who have flagged its vehicles. The company even reportedly shared some of this data with third parties who did not work for Uber.

Recently, however, it has been revealed that Uber’s updated policy tracks passengers and allows access to their personal information.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C., has called for the Federal Trade Commission to conduct an investigation into the company’s invasive practices.

The complaint filed by the EPIC reads:

Uber will claim the right to collect personal information and detailed location data of American consumers, even when they are not using the service.


Among the concerns raised by the EPIC complaint is the fact that Uber employees have admitted to tracking the geo-locations and other info regarding journalists who were questioning the company’s policies. The EPIC also points to the possible threat of hackers gaining access to users’ personal information.

In the EU, regulators have been scrutinizing the company’s privacy policies in an attempt to determine if Uber is in compliance with European privacy laws. Among the EU regulations are requirements that companies that use geo-location tracking must first obtain clear consent from the user.

EU guidelines also require the company to provide users with “comprehensive, easily accessible and understandable notice” regarding their data collection policies and to allow users access to their own collected data so that they can modify or delete particular details.

Finally, the regulations require that the data collected by companies such as Uber must be deleted as soon as the information is no longer needed for the purpose for which it was obtained.

It is unclear at this point whether Uber has revised its policies to reflect the EU regulations or similar privacy laws in the United States. The company has stated that it it amended its privacy policies to address the concerns raised by various legal entities and privacy groups.

Hudging from Uber’s past track record, there is plenty to remain concerned about. The company has showed a clear disregard for the privacy rights of its users, not to mention their continued undermining of the rights of cab drivers and other professionals throughout the world whose jobs have been threatened by Uber’s cheap, non-professional ride services.

Learn more:

Did you like this? Share it:

Interspecies Communication

Hello Dear Reader, please take the time to look at this video, it makes such a refreshing change to see human beings behaving lovingly to their animal friends and not dwelling on the cruelty inflicted on the world by the psychopaths and what a phenomenal person Anna Breytenach is, wow, it takes a lot to impress me but I’m overwhelmed at her incredible ability to communicate with all animals.

This particular story is of how she saved a black leopard from an unhappy existence but there are other videos of hers online. We know that we are all capable of doing this work and yet so few of us put the time in to nurture this God-given aspect of ourselves to achieve such heights, you’ll absolutely love this. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“If we’re destroying our trees and destroying our environment and hurting animals and hurting one another and all that stuff, there’s got to be a very powerful energy to fight that. I think we need more love in the world. We need more kindness, more compassion, more joy, more laughter. I definitely want to contribute to that. Ellen DeGeneres

Did you like this? Share it:

London Cabbies V Uber (Funded by Goldman Sachs) David V Goliath ?

Hello Dear Reader, before I post todays subject first I must express my deep sorrow for the horrific slaughter of yet more innocent civilians whilst on holiday in Tunisia & of course for what occured in Kuwait & France this week, unforgivable. The people behind these atrocities (not the programmed stooges we see in the media) I have a question, why don’t you target those responsible for the bloodshed in the Middle East ? If you are organized and coordinated enough to commit these massacres simultaneously across the planet then surely you can locate the whereabouts of the warmongering world leaders and leave ordinary men, women & children alone ?

If I lived to be a thousand years old I’d never begin to comprehend the absolute madness, the mindset of those who willingly choose to kill members of their own human family by signing up to fight a manufactured enemy. Wake up please.

Now about what’s happening here in London & as I’ve just seen on RT News, Paris too, our well loved and respected London Black Cab Drivers are deep into a war of their own against a very dubious, sprung up from nowhere-mini-cab company called Uber.
But are our cabbies aware that they are up against some of the biggest crooks alive ? the bankers Goldman Sachs, have invested over a billion pounds in Uber & with its limited funds can prolong this dispute for a very long time it can also afford the best propaganda money can buy.
With dear ol’ Blighty being ripped apart at the seams the sight of a tried & tested black cab is refreshing, a symbol of London itself & if these greedy bastards (it’s always about aquiring endless amounts of money for these people) get their way London will be all the poorer of the demise of the London Cabbie.

But let’s hope it doesn’t come to that eh ? I’m not quite sure what Nathaniel Rothschild has to do with all of this but he’s invested in an app to make it easy for cab-sharing ??? Read 2nd article

Oh & have you seen the street protests in Armenia ? brilliant, proof of what can be achieved when we stick together, they were angry about hikes in the price of electricity & persisted on staying on the streets for a few days & have been rewarded with their government backing down, well done people of Armenia.

I’m in a bit of a quandary here ! I don’t seem to be able to post as much as I like for you due to lack of time and life’s commitments & was wondering that maybe I could charge, say £1 a month & that would allow me more time to devote to this site, what do you think ?
Anyway, love to you all, Janie, xxx

““Under tyranny it is right to be a rebel!” Robert Fanney

Uber raises another $1.6bn to fund global expansion
Latest fundraising, from clients of Goldman Sachs, further increases the already stellar value of the controversial car-hailing service
Uber has raised a further $1.6bn from investors as the car-hailing service accelerates its plans for global domination.

The company, the world’s most valuable venture-backed start-up, was already worth about $41bn (£27bn) before the latest injection of funds from clients of Goldman Sachs’ wealth management service.

Uber remains in talks to raise $600m from hedge funds and other investors to add to the $1.2bn raised in December, according to a Bloomberg report. It has now raised some $4bn since being founded in 2009.

The service is now available in 270 cities around the world but has varied its offering in a bid to comply with varying local regulations. In London it offers a minicab-style taxi hire, but ride-sharing in Paris and carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Nevertheless Uber has been hit with court injunctions in Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain for violating taxi licensing rules.

On Thursday South Korea stepped up its legal battle against the company, with its telecom watchdog reporting Uber to prosecutors for violating communications rules.


European ‘jobs’ promises
The move came a month after prosecutors indicted Travis Kalanick, Uber’s American founder and chief executive, along with its Korean partner MK Korea, for operating an illegal cab service.

Uber began operating in Seoul in 2013, sparking angry protests from taxi drivers. “Go-slow” protests were staged by cab drivers in cities including Paris and London last year.

Seoul regulators are offering a 1m won (£600) reward to those who report drivers offering rides through Uber.

Kalanick said this week that Uber would seek out new partnerships with European cities as he claimed that the venture would create 50,000 jobs this year and reduce traffic congestion.

Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick speaks in Beijing in December 2014. Photograph: Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters
However, Uber would not be employing workers directly given that its drivers are regarded legally as independent contractors in cities where it operates as a minicab firm, which as London.


Since 2010, Uber has created the equivalent of 35,000 full-time jobs in its four largest markets – San Francisco, New York, London and Paris, Kalanick said.

Uber released figures on Thursday about the composition of its drivers, with just over half of those working for UberX being behind the wheel for less than 30 hours a week – if they choose to work at all.

The research found that more than 80% liked the flexibility that working for Uber affords them: “Driver-partners are using the Uber platform in many different ways, from earning a full-time income to supplementing their salaries at other jobs.”

About half have worked in the transportation industry before, and a quarter are more than 50 years old.

The promise of a new approach in Europe is a change of tack from Kalanick, who has become known for striking hard bargains with cities that attempt to force Uber to comply with what it regards as outdated or protectionist regulation.

Uber has faced regulatory scrutiny and court injunctions since its inception in San Francisco.

It has also been criticised for aggressive responses to rivals and critics as well as questions over whether the company has enough safeguards in place to ensure the physical safety and privacy of passengers.

Rothschild Makes Comeback With London Cab App Maaxi.


Nathaniel Rothschild, whose ancestor helped bankroll Britain’s war against Napoleonic France 200 years ago, is backing London cabbies in their battle against Uber Technologies Inc.

Rothschild and 39-year-old Argentine Gabriel Campos, former chief executive officer of online gaming site Pokerstars, plan to launch a taxi-sharing mobile-phone app in the next few weeks. Maaxi Ltd. aims to make traditional black cabs cheaper than public transport by grouping passengers with similar destinations, Campos said in a Sept. 23 phone interview.

Investors are pouring cash into apps that let customers order taxis and cars, or share rides using their smartphones. Uber, which is available in more than 150 cities in 45 countries, raised $1.2 billion in June, giving the San Francisco-based company a value of $17 billion. Ride-sharing app Lyft Inc. raised $250 million from investors including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. in April.

The investment by Rothschild, who joins Campos as the company’s major shareholder, comes after the financier took a sabbatical to finish a Masters degree at King’s College London.

Rothschild, 43, has used video and Twitter to market Maaxi as an alternative to car services such as Uber, which triggered protests by London cabbies who say the car-sharing service threatens jobs.

In a promotional video posted by Maaxi on YouTube last week, Rothschild checks his watch before taking a shared cab from Harrods department store to Westminster for a meeting with U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne. “The Chancellor is expecting you,” says an unidentified driver in the clip.

Expansion Funds
Maaxi will need additional funds for expansion, said Campos. He declined to comment on the prospects of a share sale for Maaxi, which has been developing the app for almost two years.

While charges will depend on how many people share a cab, the size of London’s hackney carriages and their accessible seats makes them perfect for ride sharing, Campos said. About 1,000 drivers have been signed up in the past 10 days as the app moves toward its official start, he said.

“There’s no way that any company like this can thrive unless the constituents are very happy for the long run,” he said. “Maaxi allows people not to own a car and move door-to-door at any point at any time at a very affordable price because the capacity exists and the vehicles exist.”

Efficient Routing
Rothschild declined to be interviewed when contacted by e-mail.

The financier has been prolific on Twitter, posting updates on Maaxi and engaging with both skeptical and supportive black-cab drivers. Earlier this week, Rothschild posted photos from inside black cabs as he shared journeys with the first users in a trial run.

“Door-to-door shared rides are going to be like dining at the Ritz compared to TfL,” he posted on Sept. 20, referring to Transport for London which controls the city’s buses, metro and overland train network.

Maaxi drivers will be better compensated for ride sharing than rivals, said Campos, adding that further details would be announced at the app’s launch. Maaxi’s technology in terms of routing and ensuring efficient journey-matching is more advanced, according to Campos.

Under Fire
Uber added a service in August — Uber Pool — that lets people do the equivalent of carpooling, in a race to be the dominant car-hailing service.

Uber opened a new black cab service in June for customers using its app and described its 5 percent commission as the lowest in London. Campos declined to say how much commission Maaxi would make from bookings.

“We’ve already welcomed hundreds of cabbies to Uber, and signups are increasing rapidly by the day,” a spokesperson for Uber said in an e-mailed reply to questions. “Competition is a great thing for the consumer. Londoners are voting with their fingers by downloading apps like Uber.”

Uber has come under fire from traditional taxi drivers worldwide who say they are bound by rules that don’t apply to the smartphone-based system. Cabbies in London yesterday snarled traffic as they called for a rethink of the city’s policies on rickshaws, illegal minicabs, unlicensed operators and Uber’s car-sharing service.

In London, only licensed black cabs can pick up passengers on the street. Drivers of these hackney carriages typically take two to four years to learn 320 routes through the center of the city, plus 25,000 streets and landmarks in a bid to pass a test called the Knowledge.

Maaxi offers Rothschild the chance to make an investment with social dimension, said Campos.

“The opportunity was fantastic for him in terms of being able to do something that has real social impact, that makes transportation very affordable,” Campos said. “The social impact is the piece that moved Nat the most.”

Did you like this? Share it:

Vaccine Damage – The Facts

Hello Dear Reader, King Cameron of the UK is holding secret meetings with our comrades in Brussels to pretend that he’s going to give the plebs of his Kingdom a referendum on whether to stay in the EU or to leave it…pleeeeze, do you believe for one moment that the people of the UK will be allowed anywhere near a ballot box unless the only acceptable decision (of a yes vote to stay in) had been firmly cemented amongst the slimey, secretive bunch of greedy, war-mongering thieves behind closed doors ???? Oh what fun.

I had to get the following post out to you as soon as I could, I only came across it yesterday from philosophersstoneboat though you’ll have difficulty reaching their site (try phoenix rising)
As soon as I read it it disappeared ! I’ve located it again for you as this is such a hugely important subject for most. Especially here in the UK right now as they’re advertising daily about a new vaccine to be given to all very young children from later this year. Research it please before subjecting your child to such drastic measures. And thank you Catherine J. Frompovich for getting this out. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“Vaccination is a mostrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance; it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine…Believe not in vaccination, it is a world wide delusion, an unscientific practise , a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.” Charles Rauta, Professor of Hygiene and Material Medicine 1899

UK’s Independent Newspaper Blows Lid Off Vaccine Damages

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Finally it’s happened! A member of the mainstream press has the intestinal fortitude to publish the carefully ‘kept secret’, about vaccines and vaccinations: They cause dramatic life-altering damage and more frequently than “evidence-based medicine” or “consensus science” owns up to or MDs, the medical profession, public health agencies and pro-vaccine acolytes acknowledge.

The UK’s Independent Newspaper published some extremely damning vaccine adverse drug reaction (ADR) information on May 31, 2015 that said:

In the 10 years to April this year the agency received almost 22,000 “spontaneous suspected” adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports in 13 routine immunisation categories including flu, MMR, tetanus, diphtheria and polio, according to a Freedom of Information response released earlier this month.

However, the vaccine ‘ante’ has just been upped on vaccines’ adverse events/damages according to the Freedom of Information (FOI) documentation dated May 14, 2015, according to the chart below.

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency FOI Response 14 May 2015


The above information demonstrably demonstrates – and validates – what vaccine-safety-advocates (often referred to as anti-vaxxers) have been beating the drums about: Vaccines cause irreversible damage and, as the U.S. VAERS reporting system—similar to the UK’s ADR reporting system—even deaths and for which the U.S. Vaccine Court has settled claims.

So, it’s indisputable that vaccines cause adverse health problems, which undeniably increase healthcare costs for everyone involved, plus promote more Big Pharma patented ‘products’ to deal with those ADRs. Can that be one of the hidden ‘aspects’ for promoting vaccines as assiduously as government health agencies do?

The UK is not unique in ADRs from vaccines. Every country in the world that has any vaccine program reports serious ADRs. However, what is unique is that in the USA those ADRs are not permitted to be discussed in the mainstream press and media. The Independent’s report truly is refreshing insofar as the “cat is out of the bag” definitely, and let’s make certain it stays out; that journalists globally report vaccine damage, and especially in the supposed ‘free’ press of the United States of America.

Back in May of 2013, the U.K. revealed via FOI documents that there were 30 years of secret official documents showing that U.K. government vaccine/medical experts have: 1) known the vaccines don’t work; 2) known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent; 3) known they are a hazard to children; 4) colluded to lie to the public; and 5) worked to prevent safety studies! [5]

Can you imagine how many children worldwide would have been saved from lifelong health problems—or even premature deaths—caused by vaccines IF any one of the governments colluding on the above vaccine skullduggery would have had the integrity to tell the world the scientific facts about vaccines: that Big Pharma’s vaccines actually cause harm; do not prevent disease but cause the very diseases in vaccines? Vaccines preventing diseases probably is the BIGGEST lie ever told! Why? Because it’s been perpetuated for so long, that most gullible people believe it.

Please check out the Resources section below for additional information, which is only a fraction of what’s going on about vaccines that readers may not know about due to the controlled ‘free’ press in the USA. The press and media are beholden to Big Pharma, probably because of all the advertising dollars Pharma spends in their daily newspapers and especially on TV. All those erectile dysfunction ads add up to advertising profits! The U.S. FDA also is beholden to Big Pharma for all the funding [3, 4] and consensus science it gets from them.

One last word about vaccines: They are not safe; never have been tested for the ability to cause cancer, interfere with reproduction or fertility, or their ability to cause birth defects (teratogenic). It states that right there on every vaccine package insert.

Next time your MD, employer or school wants to vaccinate you or your child, ask to see the vaccine package insert section that documents in print that the vaccine has never been tested for what was just discussed in the above paragraph. Ask him/her if he/she knew that, plus why would he/she want to inject you with toxins that can harm, as it explicitly states in the rest of the vaccine package insert, especially when every MD is sworn to do no harm.




Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on

Did you like this? Share it:

Welcome to UK 2015

Hello Dear Reader, where was I ? Here in the UK an anti-austerity march took place in London & elsewhere across the country last Saturday in response to the monstrous cuts in benefits for the most in need..i.e. children and the disabled.

Running adjacent to these reforms in recent years has been a continuous pitting of one segment of society against the other resulting in people in wheelchairs being spat at and the eldery being thought of as a waste of space by the younger generation as they receive free travel passes and other perks that they have worked thier entire lives contributing to.
There could not be more of an example than this of the ‘divide and rule’ tactic for controlling the masses in action, it’s deplorable. But my common lament of “how do people continue to fall for such a predictable and obvious ruse ? I am stunned by the average person’s stupidity…come on now liven up ! If you hold any anger at all against your neighbour over benefits I suggest you turn that anger into action against the perpetrators of such propaganda.


Cameron’s announcing today that he shall go ahead with the £ 12 billion cuts in benefits, well he would wouldn’t he, I mean what does 250,000 serfs protesting against these measures matter ? The media have done a perfect job of paving the way for them to accept that this is the only way to pay off debt ! How dare our brothers and sisters in wheelchairs expect some help from the tax payer ? And the audacity of 80 year olds occuppying the only home they’ve ever known when they could choose to be beaten and starved to death in a nearby ‘care home’ to make way for someone younger…what’s it coming to eh.

Lets put this in context, the UK is spending £ 160 BILLION on the military this year !!!! Hello…that means more bombs and lethal weaponry being unleashed onto our polluted planet in addition to the presence of enough arnaments to wipe every man, woman and child off of the face of the earth 10 times over ! Oh but what a way to make more millions “eh what, ho ho ho, who’d thought it was gonna be this easy”, can’t you just see the elite few rubbing their podgy hands together with glee ?

And how does the release of millions of tons of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere assist ‘them’ in reducing Co2 emmissions ? or (just a thought) are green taxes yet another ruse ?) to fleece yet more money from the extremely gullible and dumbed down citizen.

What is it with men and war’s ? can’t you see the dichotomy here ? We can never end pain and suffering of the human race if we continue to support ‘our boys’ going into action against their fellow men, it’s one big horrendous, vicious cycle fomented by those who insist on
perpetual war.
I tried to paste todays RT show ‘Going Underground’ hosted by Afshin Rattansi talking to Sami Ramadani who’s an expert in Middle Eastern affairs and explains what and who ISIS really is. So please search for it yourselves if you don’t have access to RT News.

Here’s a few of youtubes pertaining to this madness. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“”I do not like the pretensions of Government — the grounds on which it demands my obedience — to be pitched too high. I don’t like the medicine-man’s magical pretensions nor the Bourbon’s Divine Right.  This is not solely because I disbelieve in magic and in Bossuet’s Politique. I believe in God, but I detest theocracy. For every Government consists of mere men and is, strictly viewed, a makeshift; if it adds to its commands ‘Thus saith the Lord’, it lies, and lies dangerously.??On just the same ground I dread government in the name of science. That is how tyrannies come in. In every age the men who want us under their thumb, if they have any sense, will put forward the particular pretension which the hopes and fears of that age render most potent. They ‘cash in’. It has been magic, it has been Christianity. Now it will certainly be science. Perhaps the real scientists may not think much of the tyrants’ ‘science’– they didn’t think much of Hitler’s racial theories or Stalin’s biology. But they can be muzzled.”?
C. S. Lewis?(1898-1963), British novelist? Source: Willing Slaves of the Welfare State, first published in The Observer on July 20, 1958?

Did you like this? Share it:

Skingularity is Near – William Henry

Hello Dear Reader, last Sunday I attended a very interesting workshop with William Henry. He talked about the contents of his latest book (The Skingularity is Near) that is really fascinating. I have taken the liberty of copying a few snippets of it for you.
He writes that the Robe of Adam, the feathered cloak, the robe of righteousness all alluded to in various religions down through the ages actually refer to our “Light Bodies”, the unseen part of us that can be obtained through meditation and focusing within.
Stuff I’ve written about in earlier posts.
He continues to inform us of just how far the ‘illuminati’ and the technology giants have come and that they are on the verge of augmenting our very skin with technology.

Fifteen years ago Nick Sanders wrote a piece called “Blueprint for a Prison Planet..The Plan to Microchip Humanity..(and why you won’t believe it) very good reading if you can get a copy. He was one of the first to give us an indepth look at where we are heading and was spot on with his prediction of us being turned into a slave race through our addiction to material desires, a life of simply working and consuming.

Anyway, William Henry does a magnificent job of bringing us all up to date on what’s around the corner for us ( well what ‘they’ think is around the corner eh ! )
We’re already aware of the race to possess our souls and the pineal gland appears to be a very important component to this.
Scientists working for the digital corporations are finding ways to link the crystaline parts of the pineal gland to mobile technology therefore cell phones would become obsolete, we’d communicate to our wi-fi enviroment directly from our brain. Sounds about right, big problem is we know that ‘they’ are only interested in total control so how exactly would that work…hmmmm.

Be back soon, love to you all, Janie, xxx

““The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
? Edward L. Bernays, Propaganda

In his letters to the Ephesians (6:10-20), written while he was in prison in Rome in AD 62, the Christian apostle, Paul, gives advice on living a holy, pure and Christ- inspired life. He warns of a coming battle. He tells Christians to “be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. 11 Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13 Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. 14 Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, 15 and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. 16 In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.


Paul is clearly urging us to augment or supplement the human body with tools or ‘apps’ for a battle against an otherworldly force. Some take these as literal or actual power tools or technologies to be acquired (and improved upon, perfected). Others understand this armor to be metaphorical and psycho- spiritual (‘coming from within’) apps that we externalize, embody or exude. The ‘belt of truth’ is just that. As Paul says, the use of this spiritual technology forms a ‘shield of faith’, a suit of cosmic armor or a ‘second skin’ that seals and protects us and also permits access to realms off limits to humans clothed only in ordinary skin.


Paul’s letter also makes clear that the reason we seek to put on this miracle power garment or second skin is not just to improve the human body and live a righteous and holy (whole) life, but also to protect ourselves from predatory “powers” and “spiritual forces of evil” in the ‘hierarchy‘ of the ‘heavenly realms’ that seek to impede our rise.
Paul is telling us to follow the mystical Way of Christ, the Way of Love, and put on the Armor of God to counter an alien threat.
Who (or what and where) are these principalities, powers, rulers (‘archons’) and authorities who Paul warns come from “high places” or “heavenly realms”

Modern UFO researchers claim that they are predatory aliens from outer space who wield super advanced technology. This invisible and predatory alien race hides behind the veil of human history.
Gnostic writings from the 1st century AD discovered in Nag Hammadi, Egypt in 1945 contain warnings and descriptions of the alien predators (they called Archons) who see themselves as rulers of humanity…or the human mind, anyway. Jesus spoke of them and advised how to avoid them.
As researcher John Lamb Lash has observed in his book, “Not In His Image,” based on the physical descriptions of the Archons in the Gnostic materials, we may equate them with Grey and Reptilian alien types of contemporary ET investigations and reports. Lash is in tune with “The Song of the Greys,” the 1997 work of Nigel Kerner, who proposed the Greys are non-organic extraterrestrial beings. They are ‘roboids’ or machines who want souls and seek to create a hybrid human being in hopes that they will attain spirituality, Kerner believes. The Reptilians are the otherworldly humanoid serpent beings described in the Essenes’ Books of Enoch, and other ancient texts, as teachers and betrayers of humankind.

In January, 2015 Bloomberg News announced that Warren Buffett’s UK Northern Powergrid Holdings Company is testing a new smart-grid system that will be able to literally take control of when a human being thing can use their things.
Bloomberg uses the phrase “BEHAVIORAL SHIFT” in conjuction with the smart grid.
These smart meters pulse radiation every few seconds and put high frequencies in home wires, creating a magnetic field shown to modify live blood cells.

In closing, I would like to share insights about the Predators from Yaqui sorcerer, Don Juan, as documented by Carlos Castenada in his book “The Active Side of Infinity.”
Like the Gnostics and the apostle Paul, Don Juan taught that there is an alien predator that thinks of (and treats) humans as property. Don Juan believed they use(d) humans as a food source and can overlay the human psyche in order to keep us dumbed down and unaware of their influence.
However, it is possible, he says, to dislodge them through discipline. By allowing ourselves to be immersed in destructive emotions: fear, anxiety, anger, strife, jealousy, competitiveness, the dog-eat-dog mentality we hold at minimum what Don Juan calls our “shining coat of awareness”, thus serving the alien agenda. This “shining coat” is the Armor of God or the Rainbow Light Body.
Don Juan says we can rebuild our “shining coat” and no longer be under the influence of those dark forces by removing the “self” from our focus of existence.
This is Essene gnosticism and Jewish mysticism as pure as it gets. It speaks to the heart of my work on the Rainbow Body of Light. This is called the perfect garment by the Gnostics, who claimed that the Archons would not be able to see us once we put on these garments. As the Gospel of Philip says:
“The powers (archons) do not see those who are clothed in the perfect light, and consequently are not able to detain them. One will clothe himself in this light sacramentally in the union.”
The Gospel of Philip continues: “Not only will they be unable to detain the perfect man, but they will not be able to see him, for if they see him, they will detain him. There is no other way for a person to acquire this quality except by putting on the perfect light and he too becoming perfect light.”
In my view, the ‘perfect light’ is the Rainbow Light Body.
Don Juan taught (spiritual) discipline makes the glowing coat of awareness unpalatable to the predator.
“The result is that the predators become bewildered. An inedible glowing coat of awareness is not part of their cognition, I suppose. After being bewildered, they don’t have any recourse other than refraining from continuing their nefarious task.”
He continued, saying, “If the predators don’t eat our glowing coat of awareness for a while, it will keep on growing. Simplifying this matter to the extreme, I can say that sorcerers, by means of their discipline, push the predators away long enough to allow their glowing coat of awareness to grow beyond the level of the toes. Once it goes beyond the level of the toes, it grows back to its natural size.
If manifesting the full Rainbow Light Body seems intimidating, Don Juan’s words offer us encouragement. To protect ourselves from the Predator we may only need to raise it to the level just beyond the toes!
“But when it is revealed,” says the Gospel of Philip, “then the perfect light will flow out on every one. And all those who are in it will receive the chrism (the oil). Then the slaves will be free and the captives ransomed”.

Did you like this? Share it:

Bilderberg Meeting 2015 – As Transparent as a Lump of S..t Decides Future World in Total Secrecy !!!!

Hello Dear Reader, here’s a collection of youtubes about the devious bunch of crooks known as the Bilderbergs and this year’s oh, so benevolent meeting in Austria (held,conveniently just 26 Kilometres from G7)


I’ve been absent again for a few days, my husband prefers me to spend time with him !!! but ‘just love to be back sharing with you guys, so here I am.
Though I’m in need of a little help as one of these clips is from Alex Jones, who I’ve been informed is an agent of the illuminati to spread disinformation ! Talk about confusing ! But if anyone can report so articulately on these grotesque world leaders then I’m all ears, so thank you Alex.
Not forgetting Gideon Osborne, sorry George…I wrote a couple of years ago that he was being groomed to be our next ‘Dear Leader’ of the UK having been invited to attend the Bilderberg’s meetings on several occasions, and lo and behold here he is again on the chosen guest list, well blow me down !

George Osborne

Another clip is quite enlightening about the workings of the ‘Monty Pythonish’ parliamentary sessions. It shows Kenneth Clark answering to questioning of his involvement with the Bilderbergs. (Bearing in mind this is the same Kenneth Clark who King Cameron protected against involvement in paedophilia back in 1994 whilst head of communications for Carlton TV)

ken clarke

How he laughs and mocks the “honourable gentleman” (who’s name escape’s me) for having the audacity to highlight his connection to this highly dubious group, good viewing.

And of course there’s more….. How ludicrous that secret, covert meeting such as the Bilderbergs (why do I keep capitilising their name ???) can exist in our world, exactly what good do they actually do ? apart of course from benefitting themselves by bringing their idea of utopia closer, which is obviously to draw up the final means to enslave us once and for all.

I feel as if I’m in some kind of nightmare, I am so completely baffled that the majority of people are still not on to them and have no idea why their world has been turned upside down and that Orwellian doublespeak has replaced the English language ( bombing entire country’s equals peace) and they continue to fall for their hideous lies day after day, what goes on here I ask myself (often).

Someone please feel free to enlighten me ! Please watch, love to you all, Janie, xxx

ps thank you all so very much for your appreciative comments, it’s so encouraging to me, but whenever I try to reply individually I’m blocked from doing so ! since my website was hacked a few weeks ago I’ve received thousands of spam emails, mostly from China, ‘really don’t know what’s occurring so my apologies to all of you but I really do read every one of your comments, thanks again.


“Every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defense against a homicidal maniac.

George Orwell


Did you like this? Share it:

Psychopaths Gather in Luxury for G7 Summit to Decide Future of Their Serfs

Hello Dear Reader, whilst our wonderful leaders wallow in luxury in Bavaria for the very secretive, highly protected G7 Summit, Grandparents and families are being targeted and killed by shelling from their puppet government in Kiev following orders from the very people that are attending the G7 meeting !
It is said that there are 650 million robotic beings living amongst us, well 22,000 of them are right now being employed as thugs behaving like bouncers at a common nightclub, known as policemen at the G7 summit. What are they thinking ? don’t they know that their duty is to protect the people ? obviously not.
It has cost (so far) 250 million euros to pepperspray and maim protesters against the insane regime held in place by those present at this laughable summit.

Hmmm, let me guess what will be discussed…..the continuation of demonizing President Putin, fast tracking the implementation of Agenda 21 (see below) clamping down on internet use, biological warfare ( to instill yet more fear in everyone) the rolling out of vaccine programmes, the monopolising of all food and water supplies, increasing geo-engineering from above, creating more ways to steal from the poor, bring in more laws to criminalise the homeless… and on & on.
Their time is surely up, they are gasping for more of the energy of fear that is their oxygen, they aquire this by creating perpetual wars and killing millions of innocent people. The days when war was between opposing military forces are long gone it is all about population reduction, turning brother against brother, divide and rule but there really are so many more of us awakened souls which is what they fear the most. Hence the mobilising of the militarised police to quell any sign of resistance to their new world order.


And because Cameron has reduced defence spending doesn’t mean a thing, it’s all part of the plan to integrate the European military into one army. Anyway I could go on but it gets a little too much at times eh. There’s lots here to watch and read, love to you all, Janie, xxx

“Quote by Martin Keeley, geology scientist: “Global warming is indeed a scam, perpetrated by scientists with vested interests, but in need of crash courses in geology, logic and the philosophy of science.”


Protesters and police clash as G7 leaders prepare to discuss corruption and trade
Several people taken to hospital after scuffles in German town of Garmisch-Partenkirchen as demonstrators, some throwing bottles, face off with riot police.

Protesters have clashed with police in the German resort town of Garmisch-Partenkirchen as G7 leaders prepared for wide-ranging talks on subjects from Fifa corruption to controversial free trade agreements.

Police responded with pepper spray when a group of marchers tried to break through their cordon. Scuffles broke out as the demonstrators, some throwing bottles, faced off with riot police in a narrow lane of Alpine houses on the edge of the town.

Occasional clashes followed as the demonstrators snaked their way back through the town. One paramedic said several protesters had been taken to hospital and he was aware of around 30 people with minor injuries.

A police spokeswoman could not give any official figures on casualties nor say whether there had been any arrests.

Anti-G7 protesters demonstrate against the summit as leaders prepare to gather in Garmisch-Partenkirchen. Photograph: Carl Court/Getty Images
The crowd was estimated by police at 3,500-4,000 while organisers put it at 7,500. Police vastly outnumbered the marchers in the picturesque former Winter Olympics venue at the foot of Germany’s highest mountain, the Zugspitze.

At the two-day summit, David Cameron will call on his fellow members, Germany, France, the US, Italy, Canada and Japan, to tackle international corruption. In a speech on Sunday, in the wake of the crisis that has engulfed world football’s governing body, the prime minister is set to call corruption a “cancer” and the “arch-enemy of democracy”.

Cameron is also expected to urge fellow world leaders to come to an agreement on the controversial US-EU Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), to which many of those protesting have strong objections. Negotiations on the treaty have lasted more than 700 days.

Campaigners at Global Justice Now, one of the groups protesting in the resort, said they expect a Europe-wide petition against TTIP to hit 2m signatures in the coming week.

Guy Taylor of Global Justice Now said: “There is clearly no mandate for the G7 leaders to be pushing ahead with this disastrous trade deal.

“TTIP may bring some economic benefits for a tiny handful of the business elite but for the rest of us it would mean compromising vital public services, the stripping of regulations protecting labour rights and the environment, and a dramatic erosion of democratic process.”

The summit is also expected to discuss the possible renewal of sanctions against Russia (which was refused an invitation to what would have been a G8 summit over its involvement in Ukraine), funding for programmes to combat medical epidemics such as Ebola, and the risk of a Greek exit from the euro.

The Iraqi prime minister, Haider al-Abadi, has been invited to the G7 meeting to discuss the US-led campaign against Islamic State in his country and in Syria.

Climate change is also high on protesters’ and politicians’ agendas, and the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, called for the industrial powers to throw their weight behind a longstanding pledge to seek $100bn (£65bn) to help poor countries tackle climate change, agreed in Copenhagen in 2009.

Merkel said in a video message on Saturday that it was important to have a “confirmation of this fund” from the G7.

Protesters set up a makeshift tented camp early on Saturday, and many more people are expected to arrive on buses from across Germany in time for the summit’s start on Sunday.

German police said they would carry out spot checks at the country’s borders, which, because Germany is a member of the Schengen agreement, are normally openly accessible.

Police had planned to keep all demonstrators away from the venue, which is in a tiny village five miles from Garmisch-Partenkirchen, but a court ruled that 50 protesters could be allowed inside the security zone, so G7 leaders would be able to hear them outside.

Simon Ernst, one of the organisers of the Stop Elmau demonstration, called the G7 leaders “the henchmen of bankers and corporations” and said that allowing just 50 demonstrators near the venue was far too few.

“We think it shows an arrogant attitude toward freedom of assembly,” he said.

The group takes its name from the luxury hotel where the summit will take place, nestled 1,000 metres above sea level in the snow-capped Bavarian mountains, from Sunday until Monday.

Stop Elmau said it is also demonstrating against free trade agreements like TTIP, as well as expressing opposition to Nato, and showing solidarity with migrants and refugees.

It will also draw attention to the “surveillance society and the dismantling of democratic liberties”.

At the demonstration on Saturday afternoon, participants ranged from anarchists with their faces covered to peace protesters wrapped in rainbow flags, as well as many families with children.

One of the most striking groups was six clowns who blocked a main road in the town and forced a police van to seek an alternative route.

Monika Lambert, from the Bavarian city of Erlangen, said she had come “to exercise my democratic rights to say that everything the G7 decides is in the interest of the banks and capitalists”.

“I asked my parents what they did during the Nazi period and they did nothing,” she said. “I don’t want to tell my children and grandchildren the same thing.”

G7 leaders urge tough line on Russia at start of summit

Leaders from the Group of Seven (G7) industrial nations backed a tough line towards Moscow at the start of a summit in the Bavarian Alps, with U.S. President Barack Obama urging the gathering to stand up to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

Host Angela Merkel greeted Obama in the idyllic Alpine village of Kruen under blue skies, surrounded by locals in traditional dress, drinking beer and eating white sausage and pretzels.

The German chancellor was hoping to secure commitments from her G7 guests to tackle global warming ahead of a major United Nations climate summit in Paris in December. The German agenda also foresees discussions on global health issues, from Ebola to antibiotics and tropical diseases.

But the crises in Ukraine and Greece seemed likely to overshadow the discussions at Schloss Elmau, a luxury Alpine hotel near the Austrian border.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, speaking before the start of the summit, voiced exasperation with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, who has dismissed the latest aid-for-reform proposal from international creditors as “absurd”.

Athens is running out of cash and will default on its debt, a move that could end up pushing it out of the euro zone, if it fails to reach a deal with its European partners and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the coming weeks.

Juncker reaffirmed that a so-called “Grexit” was not an option being considered, but said this did not mean he could “pull a rabbit out of a hat” to prevent it.


› Merkel says largely up to Russia whether EU sanctions eased
› Obama – U.S. looks forward to Britain staying in the EU
› SLIDESHOW G7 leaders urge tough line on Russia at start of summit
Obama said leaders would discuss the global economy, trade partnerships and “standing up to Russian aggression in Ukraine”, as well as threats from violent extremism and climate change.

Both he and Merkel highlighted the importance of the German-American relationship, damaged in recent years by revelations of U.S. spying in Germany, including the bugging of the chancellor’s mobile phone.

“My message to the German people is simple: We are grateful for your friendship, for your leadership,” said Obama, using the traditional Bavarian greeting “Gruess Gott” with a crowd gathered in the village square in Kruen. “We stand together as inseparable allies in Europe and around the world.”

Merkel alluded to “differences” but described the United States as “our friend” and an “essential partner”.

British Prime Minister David Cameron and European Council President Donald Tusk both said they hoped the G7 would present a united front on sanctions towards Russia.

EU leaders agreed in March that sanctions imposed over Russia’s intervention in Ukraine would stay until the Minsk ceasefire agreement was fully implemented, effectively extending them to the end of the year, but a formal decision has yet to be taken.

Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi is known to be sceptical about sanctions and left-wing politicians in Germany have also called for them to be removed.

“If anyone wants to start a discussion about changing the sanctions regime, it could only be about strengthening it,” said Tusk.

European monitors have blamed a recent upsurge in violence in eastern Ukraine on Russian-backed separatists. Russian President Vladimir Putin was frozen out of what used to be the G8 after Moscow’s annexation of Crimea last year.

Lord Christopher Monckton

Corbett Report

EU Referendum for UK David Cammegh

This website is about reinstating your God-given right to be free, prosperous and fulfilled, with your nation intact and living in as much peace as possible, but strong enough to defend itself vigorously should it need to do so.
Thus it is about spreading ideas and news against the sinister U.N. Agenda 21.
That means, more or less, this website is against any aspect of globalism, transnationalism, the EU, the UN and the New World Order, while having the ultimate aim of helping us stand together, with our nations and our identities intact, to achieve overall victory for Liberty and humanity.
Since U.N. Agenda 21 is involved with just about every negative aspect in humanity now, this website deals with many areas. 

What is U.N. Agenda 21?

Perhaps a better question would be, ‘What isn’t Agenda 21?’
That’s because, as anti-U.N. Agenda 21 activist Rosa Koire says, ‘It is the blueprint, it is the action plan, to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all construction, all animals, all means of production, all energy, all information and all the human beings in the world. It is a completely comprehensive plan, it’s global and it’s implemented locally… It is in every single town all across the United States and across the world.’
It is run by the United Nations via an NGO (Non Government Organization) called ‘International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives’, commonly known as ICLEI (pronounced Ik-lee), Local Governments for Sustainability.
This is paid for by you, the taxpayer, without your consent – because you have not had a vote on its implementation.
U.N. Agenda 21 is behind the building programmes you don’t want in your area. It is behind mass immigration; which my research tells me is designed to wreck nations and their identities.
In my opinion (after considerable research), Agenda 21 is behind a large portion of unemployment, it is behind your ever-increasing energy bills, the surveillance in your street, the break down of law and order so that nations are increasingly run without rights such as habeas corpus.
Watch this video for a little more on how U./N Agenda 21 appears to you.
It has its roots in Communitarianism, which is as yet not a widely understood form of politics, not least because of the cunning way it is implemented.
For more information on U.N. Agenda 21 try Rosa Koire’s website. There you will find plenty of information and many important links to help you with your research. You might also find this flyer useful for an overview.
Why haven’t I heard of U.N. Agenda 21?
Most of those people who do not use the remarkable asset of alternative media have not heard of U.N. Agenda 21, simply because it’s being introduced by stealth, otherwise surely you would have heard of such a vast global plan and all of its aims.


Putting it simply, it is clear to me that the ‘powers that be’ DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT IT.

I believe that if the people were aware of the truth of U.N. Agenda 21, they would rise up immediately and stop it. But introduce something sinister incrementally and it will get through easily enough – as the Nazis proved in Germany, for example; or indeed as many criminal dictatorships have proved.

Some people, however, may have heard of U.N. Agenda 21 – perhaps on their local website.
That’s because, since word is getting out about this global plan, governments must reveal some of it – and it’s usually dressed up behind the green mask of fake environmentalism, the bane of the world.

But make no mistake, in my opinion (when I take into account the facts), this is a treasonous and sinister scheme, and you can see evidence of it all around you, from the massive fuel rises, to post offices being closed, to volunteerism (ie getting you to work for nothing, when you already pay enough taxes), to multiculturalism, to the continual wars, to ‘sustainable development’, to heavy surveillance (including the global application of those very nasty SMART meters), to the industry-prohibitive carbon taxes (when carbon dioxide is essential for life and actually in short supply; and besides all industry shipped abroad has no carbon limits), to the attack on the middle class via higher taxes, to the fake ‘localism’ from the ‘Localism Act’ (in the UK) which relies on more centralisation, to the dumbing down at schools and in the media, to any one of the thousands of rules and regulations being forced on us without consultation, designed to control us and dehumanise us and to bring us under one world bank and one world currency and one world government – the New World Order.

And before you dismiss what I am saying, you only need to look up Bilderberg, or the international banks admitting they run Europe, or simply the fact, for example in the the UK nigh on 80% of our laws are made by a foreign unelected bureaucratic elite – the EU.

What is the endgame of U.N. Agenda 21?

Whilst U.N. Agenda 21 has been dressed up in fake ‘green’ issues about ‘Global Warming’ or ‘Climate Change’, which have since been left behind because they have been exposed as a fraud, its real aim is by deception to put the control of the entire planet and all its assets into the hands of only a very few people.
These people include royalty (for example, Prince Charles is a great advocate of U.N. Agenda 21 (as he showed in his speech ‘The New Environmental Agenda’ at the Local Agenda 21 Conference on 7th March 1995 and his recent film ‘Harmony’), top bureaucrats, top politicians, those at the very top of giant international corporations and international banks and others.
Part of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan is, as U.N. environmental policy-maker Maurice Strong said, to eliminate the middle class. He said that the middle class way of life is not ‘sustainable'; whereas, of course, the way of life of those who are sometimes called the ‘global elite’, with their private jets and trains and fleets of cars and palaces, will continue to be very sustainable.
Hence we are seeing such huge rises in fuel costs, taxes, restrictions on small businesses. Meanwhile, the ‘global elite’ pay minimal taxes, if any, and are frequently subsidized hugely by the taxpayers.
U.N. Agenda 21 is also about population reduction.
The people behind U.N. Agenda 21 want to reduce world population by up to and beyond 95%.
As Lord Monckton said in a recent talk he did on U.N. Agenda 21, to achieve such high levels of population reduction, ‘It means that a lot of people are going to have to die’.
And before any of you readers say that the world needs less people, ask yourself whether or not it is you or your children who should die or be sterilized first.
Ask yourself if it is up to you to play God.
Here’s a very useful link to an article on the planned population reduction. In it you will find links to their own documents and quotations.
In short, I cannot see Agenda 21 in any other way except other than an all-out global attack on the people and nations of the world; which is tragically implemented by duped small time politicians and local councils and others.


What can we do about it?

We can do a lot about it!
U.N. Agenda 21 is being defeated, for example, Alabama State recently kicked ICLEI out.
This very point demonstrates its questionable legality – you have a good chance to challenge anything planned or exercised in the name of UN Agenda 21 simply because it is run by that NGO, called ICLEI, which has not been voted for in any way.
Indeed, the key to stopping any ‘developments’ forced on your area, or anything to do with U.N. Agenda 21 forced on you or on your nation, is for people TO KNOW ABOUT IT, EXPOSE IT AND VOTE OUT ANY individual who is implementing it.
There are an increasing number of people joining in the fight against Agenda 21.
As I have said, victories are happening, but we need more victories; and that means we need more people to be informed and involved in the fight against U.N. Agenda 21 and all levels of globalist deceit.
It might be useful to remember that U.N. Agenda 21 is rooted in the darkness and deceit of humanity. And it relies on our passive, ill-informed acceptance of ‘authorities’.
Its main opponent therefore is the light, action and truth of people from all nations across the world.
That means, if we want to live free, without big government intrusion into all aspects of our lives, we must be aware of what is going on in the world.
It also helps to have a good and real awareness of, and connection to, God, because that always leads to truth (see my other website here).
Once we’re aware we can begin incrementally, patiently and peacefully to dismantle this monstrous creature and its diabolical organizations so that we return our power, our nations, our prosperity and our identities back into OUR hands.

Hohourable Anne Bressington

Did you like this? Share it:

Hideous Lies of Governments

Hello Dear Reader, here’s one of my heroes, Ken O Keefe with an updated version of his articulate views on 9/11 and the ridiculous ‘war on terror’.
I just love what he has to say and how he sais it, my thoughts and humour exactly ! what a man. One of the best voices I’ve ever heard on these subjects. He rejects, unreservedly (as I do) that 9/11 was carried out by muslims and the consequent murder of millions of people since is utterly unforgivable.


Another coincidence occured to me today, I heard on the radio that Tony Blair wants it to become a crime for anyone to deny that the holocaust happened, whilst last night, listening to rediceradio, an interview with Jim Fetzer & Ole Dammegard (never heard of them before) and Jim Fetzer too began talking about the holocaust being a hoax. Now I know lots of jewish people died and it was an undeniably horrific time for all, but surely, with such a sensitive issue, we have to be absolutely sure about what really went on before we condemn and ridicule honest, decent truthseekers. Ken O Keefe also addresses this here.

All the signs are there, and evidence being uncovered that suggests this was just another part of the plan to bring in a ‘New World Order’. Revisit my post showing “The Greatest Story Never Told”.


I’m continually amazed at the depth of unconsciousness of the people of the UK, very frustrating. They have been brow beaten into accepting lies as truth, at the drop of a hat any law-abiding person can be labeled a criminal whilst the real criminals are the very ones changing the law on a daily basis and the majority simply lie down and acquiesce to their rulers………


One of the best sites philosophersstone views from the boat, has become unobtainable ! what’s occuring ??? So to access it please go to Phoenix rising always a great source of information.

I’ve just heard that John Harris has died ! now he was only in his 40’s I believe, so I’m very curious as to how he died, ‘will research it further asap. I first met John in 2010 at one of his life-changing talks in London. He was the first ‘freeman of the land’ that I had spoken to, a mine of knowledge on the subject, brilliant, God bless your soul John.
Please search for all the truth you can while we still have the internet at our disposal. Love to you all, Janie, xxx

“How goddamn foolish it is, the war. There’s no war in the worth that’s worth fighting for. I don’t care where it is. They can’t tell me any differnet. Money, money is the thing that causes it all. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised that the people that start wars and promote ’em are the men that make the money, make the ammunition, make the clothing and so forth. Just think of the poor kids that are starvin’ to death in Asia and so forth that could be fed with how much you make one big shell of. Alvin “Tommy” Bridges
Studs Terkel

Did you like this? Share it:

EU Referendum ? Foregone Conclusion – Monsanto & Water Shortages

Hi My Truth-seeking Friends, it’s good to be back with you again to share some more useful information.
‘didn’t read a newspaper or watch TV during my absence so have been busy catching up with the latest lies and propaganda of the mainstream media of these past few days.

“Trust me, it’s in the bag, we’ll never accept a NO vote from the plebs”

King Cameron et al are in panic mode with Cameron charging around Europe pretending to negotiate reforms on our membership of the EU…..HA HA HA…as if he gives a f..k about our welfare. It’s all smoke and mirrors. They’re desperate to stay part of the Military Dictatorship that is the EU, they stand to lose so much if the peasants vote NO to remaining part of the 4th Reich and plan to bring the referendum forward in the hope that the tranced out masses will have stayed asleep long enough to have fallen for their lies and sorcery to be implemented.

Here’s a couple of articles detailing some of the corruption within the EU’s finances.

Also, the water shortage in LA, California I feel is in preparation for ‘Monsanto’ and others who have surreptitiously purchased rights to water supplies across the world, to impose huge tariff’s for public access to this God-given, essential, life giving commodity.
So, first is an article from to elaborate more on this rotten, unethical corporation.

Before I go, remember my friends to get as fit and as healthy as possible we are going to need our physical strength as well as our spiritual knowledge to help not only ourselves through the insanity and chaos that abounds but to assist our loved ones too.

Love to you all, Janie, xxx
ps I never for one minute forget about those of our human family that are presently experiencing utter pain and turmoil because of the
despicable actions of the extremely evil, warmongering few that derive enormous pleasure from inflicting suffering and make massive monetary gains in the process, I will expose more of that very soon.

““Lucifer comes to give us the final … Luciferic initiation … that many people now and in the days ahead, will be facing—for it is an initiation into the New Age. … No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian initiation.”
–Source: “Reflections on the Christ,” by David Spangler, on the Board of Directors of Planetary Citizens, United Nations; quoted in Unicorn in the Sanctuary, by Randy England, 1978.

Monsanto Moves To Control Water Resources & Fish Farming

Over the past few years, Monsanto, a chemical firm, has positioned itself as an agricultural company through control over seed – the first link in the food chain. Monsanto now wants to control water, the very basis of life.

In 1996, Monsanto bought the biotechnology assets of Agracetus, a subsidiary of W. R. Grace, for $150 million and Calgene, a California-based plant biotechnology company for $340 million. In 1997, Monsanto acquired Holden seeds, the Brazilian seed company, Sementes Agrocerus and Asgrow. In 1998, it purchased Cargill’s seed operations for $1.4 billion and bought Delta and Pine land for $1.82 billion and Dekalb for $2.3 billion.

In India, Monsanto has bought MAHYCO, Maharashtra Hybrid Company, EID Parry and Rallis. Mr. Jack Kennedy of Monsanto has said, “we propose to penetrate the Indian agricultural sector in a big way. MAHYCO is a good vehicle.” According to Mr. Robert Farley of Monsanto, “what you are seeing is not just a consolidation of seed companies, it’s really a consolidation of the entire food chain. Since water is as central to food production as seed is, and without water life is not possible, Monsanto is now trying to establish its control over water. During 1999, Monsanto plans to launch a new water business, starting with India and Mexico since both these countries are facing water shortages.”

Monsanto is seeing a new business opportunity because of the emerging water crisis and the funding available to make this vital resource available to people. As it states in its strategy paper, “first, we believe that discontinuities (either major policy changes or major trendline breaks in resource quality or quantity) are likely, particularly in the area of water and we will be well-positioned via these businesses to profit even more significantly when these discontinuities occur. Second, we are exploring the potential of non-conventional financing (NGOs, World Bank, USDA, etc.) that may lower our investment or provide local country business-building resources.” Thus, the crisis of pollution and depletion of water resources is viewed by Monsanto as a business opportunity. For Monsanto, “sustainable development” means the conversion of an ecological crisis into a market of scarce resources. “The business logic of sustainable development is that population growth and economic development will apply increasing These pressures and the world’s desire to prevent the consequences of these pressures, if unabated, will create vast economic opportunity – when we look at the world through the lens of sustainability, we are in a position to see current and foresee impending-resource market trends and imbalances that create market needs. We have further focussed this lens on the resource market of water and land. These are the markets that are most relevant to us as a life sciences company committed to delivering food, health and hope to the world, and there are markets in which there are predictable sustainability challenges and therefore opportunities to create business value.”

Monsanto plans to earn revenues of $420 million and a net income of $63 million by 2008 from its water business in India and Mexico. By 2010, about 2.5 billion people in the world are projected to lack access to safe drinking water. At least 30 per cent of the population in China, India, Mexico and the U.S. is expected to face severe water stress. By 2025, the supply of water in India will be 700 cubic km per year, while the demand is expected to rise to 1,050 units. Control over this scarce and vital resource will, of course, be a source of guaranteed profits. As John Bastin of the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development has said, “Water is the last infrastructure frontier for private investors.”

Monsanto estimates that providing safe water is a several billion dollar market. It is growing at 25 to 30 per cent in rural communities and is estimated to rise to $300 million by 2000 in India and Mexico. This is the amount currently spent by NGOs for water development projects and local government water supply schemes and Monsanto hopes to tap these public finances for providing water to rural communities and convert water supply into a market. The Indian Government spent over $1.2 billion between 1992 and 1997 for various water projects, while the World Bank spent $900 million. Monsanto would like to divert this public money from public supply of water to establishing the company’s water monopoly. Since in rural areas the poor cannot pay, in Monsanto’s view capturing a piece of the value created for this segment will require the creation of a non-traditional mechanism targeted at building relationships with local government and NGOs as well as through mechanisms such as microcredit.

Monsanto also plans to penetrate the Indian market for safe water by establishing a joint venture with Eureka Forbes/Tata, which controls 70 per cent of the UV Technologies. To enter the water business, Monsanto has acquired an equity stake in Water Health International (WHI) with an option to buy the rest of the business. The joint venture with Tata/Eureka Forbes is supposed to provide market access and fabricate, distribute, service water systems; Monsanto will leverage their brand equity in the Indian market. The joint venture route has been chosen so that “Monsanto can achieve management control over local operations but not have legal consequences due to local issues.”


Another new business that Monsanto started in 1999 in Asia is aquaculture.

It will build on the foundation of Monsanto’s agricultural biotechnology and capabilities for fish feed and fish breeding. By 2008, Monsanto expects to earn revenues of $1.6 billion and a net income of $266 million from its aquaculture business. While Monsanto’s entry into aquaculture is through its sustainable development activity, industrial aquaculture has been established to be highly non-sustainable. The Supreme Court has banned industrial shrimp farming because of its catastrophic consequences. However, the Government, under pressure from the aquaculture industry, is attempting to change the laws to undo the court order.

At the same time, attempts are being made by the World Bank to privatise water resources and establish trade in water rights. These trends will suit Monsanto well in establishing its water and aquaculture businesses. The Bank has already offered to help. As the Monsanto strategy paper states: “We are pa Monsanto’s water and aquaculture businesses, like its seed business, aimed at controlling the vital resources necessary for survival, converting them into a market and using public finances to underwrite the investments. A more efficient conversion of public goods into private profit would be difficult to find. Water is, however, too basic for life and survival and the right to it is the right to life.

Privatisation and commodification of water are a threat to the right to life. India has had major movements to conserve and share water. The pani panchayat and the water conservation movement in Maharashtra and the Tarun Bharat Sangh in Alwar have regenerated and equitably shared water as a commons property. This is the only way everyone will have the right to water and nobody will have the right to abuse and overuse water. Water is a commons and must be managed as a commons. It cannot be controlled and sold by a life sciences corporation that peddles in death.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for research and educational purposes.

By Martin Banks in Brussels 5:56PM GMT 18 Mar 2009
According to the Taxpayers’ Alliance, EU membership costs every Briton £2,000 per year, compared with the £220 quoted by the EU.
The UK-based lobby group says that, annually, the total cost of British membership of the 27-member club is £118 billion.
This contrasts sharply with Commission statistics which show that in 2007, the most recent year for which figures are available, Britain’s net contribution to the EU totalled some £3.8 billion.
The Taxpayers’ Alliance bases its figures on what it considers the “real, underestimated and hidden” costs of EU membership.
These include Britain’s direct contributions to the EU, the cost to UK business of complying with and administering EU regulations, EU administration costs and also higher food prices, said to result from implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy and Common Fisheries Policy.
The claims are made in a new Taxpayers’ Alliance booklet, entitled “The Great European Rip-Off.”
Its co-author, Matthew Elliott, the organisation’s CEO, said: “The book tries to find a total cost of the EU but does not suggest that it is all waste or that it could be eliminated overnight.
“However, an estimate of the total cost provides an important guide to the burden placed on member countries’ economies and their citizens due to EU membership.”

The Commission said it uses “totally” different data based solely on Britain’s direct contributions to the EU. A spokesman said that in 2007 Britain’s net contribution to the EU was 4.1 billion euros (£3.8 billion), or 0.21 per cent of the country’s GNI.
“Whatever anyone else says, we stick by these figures,” she said.

EU auditors refuse to sign off more than £100billion of its own spending
Critics attack the EU for demanding that David Cameron pays a £1.7 billion bill despite an official audit failing to give a clean bill of health to more than £100 billion of Brussels spending


Photo: ALAMY
By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels, and Peter Dominiczak10:00PM GMT 04 Nov 2014Comments1044 Comments
The European Union is accused of “breathtaking hypocrisy” for continuing to demand that David Cameron pays a £1.7 billion bill despite its own auditors failing to give a clean bill of health to more than £100 billion of spending by Brussels.

According to the annual report of the European Court of Auditors, seen by The Telegraph, £5.5 billion of the EU budget last year was misspent because of controls on spending that were deemed to be only “partially effective” by experts.
The audit, published this morning, found that £109 billion out of a total of £117 billion spent by the EU in 2013 was “affected by material error”.
It means that the Brussels accounts have not been given the all clear for 19 years running.
Treasury sources said that the disclosure shows why the EU needs “urgent reform”.

It’s the British media that needs auditing
Jon Danzig
posted by Jon Danzig

on November 13, 2014

By Jon Danzig

It’s that time of year again when the European Union budget is subject to scrutiny. Every year the budget is audited by the independent European Court of Auditors. Every year for the past seven years the Auditors have signed off the accounts as being reliable and accurate. And every year, British media have claimed that the EU accounts haven’t been passed by the auditors at all.

“EU auditors refuse to sign off more than £100billion of its own spending”, boldly asserted The Telegraph. Claimed the Daily Express, “Yet again the EU auditors refuse to sign off budget.” CityAM concurred and reported, “The European Court of Auditors (ECA) declined this week to sign off the accounts for the twentieth year running.”

As I also reported on my ‘EU ROPE’ blog, on BBC Radio 4’s flagship news programme, “Today” presenter, John Humphrys, added his affirmation that the EU books had never been passed by the auditors.


Interviewing European Commission spokesman, Jakub Adamowicz, Mr Humphrys broadcast, “The trouble is that people are terribly sceptical about any figures that come out of Brussels, aren’t they? Because you’ve never yet been able to balance your books in the European Union and the Commission, and we all kind of think, well, they make it all up as they go along, really, and they just keep asking for more.”

Mr Adamowicz, spokesman for budget, transport and regional policy, replied, “We are working with very good accounting standards with a lot of transparency,” but Mr Humphrys interjected, “So why can’t you balance your books then, you never have!” Even though Mr Adamowicz responded, “Oh we are, we are!” Mr Humphrys went on to proclaim, “But the fact is that the auditors have never, as far as I can recall, correct me if I’m wrong, actually signed off the books and said ‘yep, fair enough, that’s accurate’. They won’t do it!”

Mr Admowicz rebutted, “Oh they have just done so this week, signing off, saying that the accounting standards are good and…” The sentence wasn’t finished as Mr Humphrys interrupted, “But they haven’t signed off the accounts have they? That’s the point, they didn’t do it last year, they didn’t do it the year before, they didn’t do it the year before; I mean they don’t do it!”

So who’s correct? The strident headlines of some British newspapers, echoed by the reassuring dulcet tones of John Humphrys? Or the Polish EU commission spokesman who could hardly get a word in?

The fact is that, contrary to the convincing assertions by some UK media, the EU accounts have been passed by the independent auditors every year since 2007 as accurate, legal, regular and reliable. Furthermore, the EU has no debt or borrowings and the books are always balanced every year. (From 1994 to 2004, the EU budget was subject to cash-based accounting. Improved accruals-based accounting was introduced in 2005. The European Court of Auditors gave qualified approval to accounts until 2006, and unqualified approval – ‘clean’ opinion – since 2007.)

It’s true that the auditors strongly criticised EU expenditure for having 4.7% of errors – these were essentially administrative mistakes, and specifically not fraud – but then, all government accounts across the world have a percentage of managerial errors. For example, in some recent years, the US government accounts had error rates higher than 5% – worse than the EU. In the UK, some government department budgets have error rates bigger than the EU budget. For example, according to the National Audit Office, Housing Benefit fraud and error has increased to 5.8%.

Since 2006, EU budgets have suffered from an annual ‘error rate’ ranging from 3.3% to 7.3%. Anything above 2% is categorised as ‘material error’. The Auditors, however, commended the European Commission for making strenuous efforts in trying to reduce the error rate to 2% or below.

Almost all of the errors didn’t take place in Brussels at all, but by EU member states at national government level.

In his statement about the audit to the European Parliament this week, the Court of Auditors President, Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira, pointed out that the only area of EU expenditure not affected by material error was the EU’s spending on its own administration. This actually shows that the European Commission has tight control on its internal finances. The problems occur when the money leaves Brussels for spending by member states – and that’s actually how 94% of all EU money is used, in EU countries on policies and programmes for the benefit of EU citizens. National governments have primary responsibility for managing and controlling 80% of all EU funds. That’s why Mr da Silva Caldeira called on all EU member states – which includes the UK government of course – to play their part in helping to prevent errors. He also called for the EU budget to be more focused on performance than expenditure.

As for fraud, this affects an estimated 0.2% of the EU budget – modest by international standards, and much better than many British government department budgets.

The EU’s audit processes are more robust than those of the UK Government. It was Audit General Sir John Bourn who stated that if the European Court of Auditors standards had applied to the British government’s accounts, he could not have signed off those accounts in total, because he had to give an adverse opinion on 13 of the UK government’s budgets.

If some of the British media were subject to an audit of their reporting of the EU accounts, by my reckoning their error rate wouldn’t be less than 5%, but closer to 100%. So why do they report that the EU accounts haven’t been signed off when clearly they have been? Why do they report that the EU accounts haven’t been balanced, when they are balanced every year? It’s hard to know why: is this a dark anti-EU agenda that pervades much of our media? Or is it simply a misunderstanding of the way the EU accounts and audit work? Either way, it’s not good for democracy or edifying debate, which depend on accurate reporting and information.

This week the European Commission representation in London told me, “The statement that the EU accounts have not been signed off by auditors for X years is a myth – one which we have exposed many times. The opening remark by John Humphrys – that the EU has not balanced its books – shows one of the reasons why this myth perpetuates: journalists assume the EU budget works like the budget of a national member state, which it doesn’t. Unlike national accounts, the EU budget cannot generate debt or be in deficit. It is balanced, each and every year.”

The Commission also pointed out that often the errors are first detected by their own internal audits, something which the Court of Auditors has acknowledged. The Commission also stated that they undertake financial corrections which brings the average error rate down to below 2%, and commented, “Although the Court does not take full account of corrections in its calculation, they do indicate sound financial management.”

The European Court of Auditors (ECA) told me in an emailed list of clarifications this week, “It is a frequent misunderstanding that the ECA did not approve or sign off the EU accounts.” In response to the Daily Telegraph and other UK media that claimed the EU accounts had not been given the “all clear” for 19 years, the Court confirmed, “The ECA has signed off the 2013 accounts as reliable (given a ‘clean opinion’), as it has for every financial year since 2007.”

The ECA further explained, “The ECA concludes that the 2013 accounts present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the EU and its results for the year. As well as the opinion on the accounts, the ECA is also required to give an opinion – based on its audit testing – on whether the underlying payments were made in accordance with EU rules. For 2013, the estimated level of error in these transactions was again too high at 4.7% for the ECA to give a clean opinion on the regularity of expenditure.”

But – and it really is a big but – the ECA made the point that the blame mostly rests with member states who made incorrect claims for EU funding in the first place. “The ECA concluded that for a large proportion of the errors found, national authorities had sufficient information available to have detected and corrected many of them before claiming reimbursement from the Commission. This could have significantly reduced the error rate.”

As to how British media could have got their reporting so wrong, the ECA press office commented, “In the past, some commentators have multiplied the total EU budget by the error rate and came up with a total for ‘money wasted’. This approach is simplistic and can be misleading. The £109 billion refers to the spending areas for which our audit work shows a material error rate. This is correct but vastly overstates the impact of those errors: 4.7% of the budget as a whole.”

So in summary, these are the facts:

• The EU budget is always balanced, so there is no debt or deficit.

• The independent European Court of Auditors have signed off the European Commission accounts every year for the entire 2007-2013 accounting period.

• The Auditors reported that the Commission’s accounts were accurate, legal, regular and reliable.

• For 2013, EU Budgetary spending totalled €148.5 billion representing about 1% of the 28 EU members GDP. (By contrast, the budgets of EU countries represent 49% of GDP on average.)

• The Auditors found that EU revenue was free of ‘material error’.

• The Auditors criticised the error rate of 4.7% of the EU’s 2013 expenditure. But this ‘error rate’ is not fraud; it relates to expenditure not strictly applied according to EU regulations. Most errors took place at national level by EU member states rather than in Brussels. The goal of the EU is to have an error rate of no more than 2%.

• The EU states that it “claws back” undue payments from the project or country at fault. This can bring the average error rate to below 2%.

• Over 95% of all EU expenditure is in line with the rules.

• 94% of the EU budget is actually spent in EU countries on policies and programmes that benefit citizens directly.

• The EU budget has to be democratically approved by the European Parliament and agreed by the European Council, which comprises the democratically elected heads of member states.

Jon Danzig is an award winning medical and investigative journalist, formerly at the BBC. He specialises in Health, Human Rights and the European Union. Twitter: @Jon_Danzig

Did you like this? Share it: