Hello Dear Reader, I can’t say for sure what happened here in London UK yesterday but I don’t believe one word printed or spoken by the controlled media so I immediately thought it just had to be another psy-ops at work. They just have to keep ‘terrorism’ on the front pages, keep people in total fear of their muslim neighbours, to perpetuate violence and hatred between locals and immigrants otherwise their evil plan for total dominance of our every move and freedom becomes less likely to occur.
So I was pleased to come across this video showing you the absurdity of the whole scenario, has to be seen to be believed !
How on earth do ‘they’ continue to get people to believe these hideous lies ???
There will now follow the inevitable call for more armed forces on the streets and the removal of more of our liberties and rights all in the name of ‘security’ or ‘terrorism’.
There are so many anomalies to this story, this beheading of a British soldier took place on top of a military base, where were the military security or police for 20-25 minutes that it took them to respond ? Where is the blood from this beheading ?
Please watch this video, love to you all, Janie, xxx
“A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both, and deserve neither.” Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826 3rd US President
Hello Dear Reader, here’s some great videos for you, as the 2013 Bilderberger meeting draws close information on the agenda is leaking out as shown in 2nd video. The chosen location appears to be out of bounds for peaceful protesters, almost impenetrable. Watch & see.
Also, there’s a worthy article by Stephen Lendman from prisonplanet.com describing the bilderberger’s close ties to google & their shared interest in regulating the internet. All Great stuff, love to you all, Janie, xxx
ps just added amazing article by Daniel Estulin from 2006
“The real menace of our Republican is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses generally referred to as ‘international bankers’. This little coterie….run our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a self-created screen…(and) seizes…our executive officers…legislative bodies…schools…courts…newspapers and every agency created for the public protection. John F. Hylan
May 17, 2013
Its four-day meeting occurs annually. It’s a rite of spring. British political economist Will Hutton calls the group the “high priests of globalization.”
Powerful movers and shakers have their own agenda.They discuss key issues.
They do it year round. Once annually they meet face-to-face. They plot strategy to exploit the world’s riches. They want them for themselves.
They try to keep meeting dates, locations, and issues to be discussed secret. Word gets out. It’s official. Britain’s five-star Grove Hotel is this year’s venue. It’s a Hertfordshire, England hotel resort. It calls itself “London’s cosmopolitan country estate.”
It’s 18 miles from London. It’s 30 minutes from Heathrow Airport. It’s ideal for secluded meetings. Great pains are taken to keep journalists, activists, and other uninvited guests away.
On May 13, Infowars reporters Paul Joseph Watson and Jon Scobie visited the Grove Hotel. They claim to have “groundbraking” information.
Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt is a regular Bilderberg attendee. Watson and Scobie said his company is “merging” with Bilderberg.
“Google’s annual Zeitgeist conference, which has been based at the Grove since 2007, immediately precedes the Bilderberg Group conference by a matter of days.”
“Backed up by prior research, we were able to confirm in conversations with hotel managers and others that the Grove is now a central base for Google’s agenda to control the global political and technological landscape.”
Bilderberg’s “being recast as ‘Google-Berg’ – partly because of efforts on behalf of activists to tear away the veil of Bilderberg’s much cherished secrecy, and partly as a means of re-branding authoritarian, undemocratic secret gatherings of elites as trendy, liberal, feel-good philanthropic-style forums like Google Zeitgeist and TED.”
In May 2012, London’s Telegraph headlined “Google invites the best and brightest into its Big Tent.”
It’s Google’s annual Zeitgeist conference. The Telegraph compared it to annual Davos World Economic Forum meetings. Major global figures participate in both.
Eric Schmidt thinks “privacy is a relic of the past,” said Infowars. He “plans to turn Google into the ultimate Big Brother.”
He and Bilderberg members share a common agenda. In part, it reflects a “collectivist, permanently networked world (without) individuality and privacy.”
Bilderberg’s grand design is one-world government comprised of rulers and serfs. It wants total unchallenged global control.
Infowars said its “inside source” listed the following June issues for discussion:
destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities within three years;
prolonging war on Syria by arming anti-Assad elements;
the threat of a global pandemic;
controlling 3D printing;
Internet control through “cyber resilience;”
establishing a ministry of truth; Orwell explained its mission and more, saying:
“The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.”
“These contradictions are not accidental, nor do they result from from ordinary hypocrisy: they are deliberate exercises in doublethink.”
Other Bilderberg topics include:
smart cities for mass surveillance;
diffusing austerity induced social protests;
preventing Britain from leaving the EU;
propping up the euro to keep the Eurozone intact;
minimal 2013 economic growth;
increasing central bank power;
transferring more wealth from ordinary people to corporations and super-rich elites; and
preventing a growing credit bubble from popping.
In 2007, Privacy International’s “Race to the Bottom” report addressed privacy rankings of Internet service companies. A previous article discussed its comments on Google, saying:
“….throughout our research we have found numerous deficiencies and hostilities in Google’s approach to privacy that go well beyond those of other organizations.”
It’s “an endemic threat to privacy. This is in part due to the diversity and specificity of Google’s product range and the ability of the company to share extracted data between these tools, and in part due to Google’s market dominance and the sheer size of its user base.”
“Its aggressive use of invasive or potentially invasive technologies and techniques” is unmatched.
It’s able to “deep drill into the minutiae of a user’s life and lifestyle choices.” It has no qualms about doing it irresponsibly.
It retains volumes user information. No limitations are placed on its subsequent use or disclosure. Users aren’t able to delete or withdraw it.
It retains all “search strings and associated IP-addresses and time stamps for at least 18 to 24 months, and does not provide users with an expungement option.”
It has other personal information on hobbies, employment, addresses, phone numbers, and more. It retains it after users delete their profiles.
It “collects all search results entered through Google Toolbar, and identifies all Google Toolbar users with a unique cookie that allows Google to track the user’s web movements.”
Information is retained indefinitely. It provides a permanent record. Doing so spurns OECD Privacy Guidelines and EU data protection law provisions.
Users can’t edit or delete records and information. They can’t access log information generated through various Google services, such as Google Maps, Video, Talk, Reader, or Blogger.
In 2004, Google also acquired the CIA-linked company Keyhole, Inc. It maintains a worldwide 3-D spy-in-the-sky images database.
Its software provides a virtual fly-over and zoom-in capability. It does so within a one-foot resolution.
It’s supported by In-Q-Tel. It’s a venture capital CIA-funded firm. It “identif(ies) and invest(s) in companies developing cutting-edge information technologies that serve United States national security interests.”
In 2003, its CEO, John Hanke, said:
“Keyhole’s strategic relationship with In-Q-Tel means that the Intelligence Community can now benefit from the massive scalability and high performance of the Keyhole enterprise solution.”
In 2006, former CIA clandestine services case officer, Robert Steele, said:
“I am quite positive that Google is taking money and direction from my old colleague Dr. Rick Steinheiser in the Office of Research and Development at CIA, and that Google has done at least one major prototype effort focused on foreign terrorists which produced largely worthless data.”
“I think (Google is) stupid to be playing with CIA, which cannot keep a secret and is more likely to waste time and money than actually produce anything useful.”
On April 29, 2009, Willem Buiter’s Financial Times article headlined “Gagging on Google,” saying:
“Google is to privacy and respect for intellectual property rights what the Taliban are to women’s rights and civil liberties: a daunting threat that must be fought relentlessly by all those who value privacy and the right to exercise, within the limits of the law, control over the uses made by others of their intellectual property.”
It should be strictly regulated, “and if necessary, broken up or put out of business.” It “lays the foundations for corporate or even official Big Brotherism.”
Google Street View’s addition to Google Maps, “provides panoram(ic) images visible from street level in cities around the world.”
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
“The cameras record details of residents’ lives.” They do so without permission. Personal privacy is violated.
It’s also done through tracking cookies or “third-party persistent cookies.” They assist interest-based advertising. It’s known as behavioral targeting.
In the wrong hands, information can be used “to put a commercial squeeze on people, but also to extort and blackmail them.”
In government hands, it enhances “a pretty effective and very nasty police state.”
Can Google be trusted to use this information responsibly? “Of course not.” It’s a business run by “amoral capitalists.” It seeks profits by any means.
Google and other Internet search engines “should not be trusted because they cannot be trusted.” Because of its size and dominance, Google’s “the new evil empire of the internet.” It’s a menacing “Leviathan.”
If true, partnering (merging) with Bilderberg enhances the threat. Institutionalized spying endangers everyone. Today’s technology exceeds the worst of what Orwell imagined.
Big Brother isn’t fiction. It’s watching everyone all the time for any reason. It does so with sweeping technological effectiveness. It makes Bilderberg’s ideal world more possible.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.
Bilderberg 2013: First Look
Report: Mid-East War On Bilderberg 2013 Agenda
Swedish Head Of Social Democrats First Admitted Bilderberg 2013 Participant
Large Protests, Extensive Media Coverage Signifies Awakening To Bilderberg Agenda
FBI ‘secretly spying’ on Google users, company reveals
This article was posted: Friday, May 17, 2013 at 9:51 am
Excellent article by Daniel Estulin from 2006
The Bilderberg Club: a secret society
of the richest and most influential people
conspiring to achieve a world government
The November-December, 2005 issue of the Kingston Eye Opener (Box 3514, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 5J9) published an interview of editor Geoff Matthews with Daniel Estulin, Communications Training Specialist, who wrote a book on the Bilderbergers:
Daniel, could you please define Bilderberg for our readers.
Bilderberg is not a person, but an idea. It is an idea centred on the perception of man as intrinsically evil. Humanity cannot gain its freedom from synarchism unless it defeats the idealism that it represents. It is the idea that creates the policies of state which rip up the tallest constitutions and drag humanity into war from the highest position of power. That is why it must be acknowledged that World War II has not been won in real terms. A single man and his clique had been brought down in this war at a cost of a hundred million lives lost, but the idea behind them had not been defeated. The idea has now come to roost in America, and has infested its platform of business, its economy, its institutions for learning, and finally, its highest position of government.
The 2006 meeting of the Bilderbegers took place June 8-10 at the Brookstreet Hotel, in Ottawa, Canada. Ottawa police officers were standing guard outside a dozen metal gates that served as security checkpoints a half kilometre from the hotel. But to approach the hotel property, even uniformed officers had to show their credentials to the half -dozen black-suited men working for a private security firm hired by the Bilderbergers.
Some of this year’s attendees were pictured on the front page of the Ottawa Citizen: from left to right, first row: David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission and former chairman of the Chase Manhattan Bank; Frank McKenna, former Premier of New Brunswick and ex-ambassador to the U.S.; Gordon Nixon, President and CEO of the Royal Bank of Canada; second row: James Wolfensohn, former president of the World Bank; Richard Perle, assistant secretary of defence to U.S. President Reagan and advisor of present President Bush; Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
Who was the most prominent individual involved with the founding of the Bilderbergers?
Without a doubt, Joseph Retinger, a 33rd degree mason. He was the political aide to General Sikorski, and served for the London-based Polish government-in-exile. In addition, at the age of 58, he parachuted into German-occupied territory outside Warsaw for some sabotage missions.
Due to his high-profile career, in the 1950s he was able to create contacts with numerous high-ranking military officials and political leaders. His main aim was to unite the world in peace. His peace dividend was to be under the control of supranational, powerful organisations. He believed that such organisations would be immune from short-term ideological conflicts erupting between governments. To Retinger, it was insignificant what dominated the economic ideology of a country. He believed these differences could be brought into line by powerful multinational organisations dictating and applying powerful economic and military policies, thereby creating a union and a bond between the nations.
Oh really!? I thought that it was Prince Bernhard of Holland who actually founded the secret Club.
Bernhard was a poster boy. A pretty face and a facade. In 1952, Retinger approached Bernhard with a proposal for a secret conference to involve the NATO leaders in an open and frank discussion on international affairs behind closed doors. Prince Bernhard, at the time, was an important figure in the oil industry and held a major position in Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell Oil), as well as Société Générale de Belgique — a powerful global corporation.
In which ways (people, institutions, etc.) are the decisions of the Club “networked” and forwarded in the level of international organizations, the media, banks, states and governments in a way that they can be implemented?
You know, everywhere you look — government, big business, and any other institution seeking to exercise power — the key is secrecy. Meetings such as those of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the G-8, World Trade Organisation, World Economic Forum, Central Banks, the European Union Council of Ministers and the EU Commission, EU summits, government cabinet meetings, numerous think tanks, etc., are always conducted behind closed doors. The only possible reason for this is that they don’t want you and me to know what they are really up to. That well worn excuse for keeping things under wraps — “it is not in the public interest” really means that it is not in the interest of the powers that be that the public should know.
However there is, in addition, a network of private forums and meetings that take place where the secrecy principle extends to the forums and meetings themselves — by and large, we don’t even know that they are taking place, let alone what is being planned and discussed.
There’s the World Economic Forum at Davos in January/February, the Bilderberg and G8 meetings in June/July, and the IMF/World Bank annual conference in September. A kind of international consensus emerges and is carried over from one meeting to the next. But no one’s really leading it. This consensus becomes the background for G8 economic communiqués; it becomes what informs the IMF when it imposes an adjustment programme on Argentina; and it becomes what the US President proposes to Congress.
With what other international centres of power/authority does the Club cooperate and in what aspect?
Bilderberg controls the IMF, the World Bank, the UN, all the European Central Banks. Every prominent European commissioner has at one time or another attended a Bilderberger meeting. Every NATO general secretary is a Bilderberger. You see what we are up against.
Are there any other centres of power/authority that are considered opposite/rival to the Club? If yes, which are they and what do they stand for?
Bilderberg, in fact, is a foreign policy arm of an all-powerful and completely unknown group called “The Committee of 300” whose ancestors were the British East Indian Tea Company, whose main line of work didn’t have anything to do with selling tea but rather with moving drugs.
In fact, the entire world drug trade is controlled by the most powerful man and a few women in the world. All of them belong to the Committee of 300. I have spoken on several occasions with deep cover intelligence officers, both in Europe and the US, and all of them have given me a rough estimate of annual drug profit margins between US $500-$700 billion. Most of this dirty money is recycled through all the major stock markets, and then pocketed as a legitimate profit.
Who invites the people that attend the gatherings of the Bilderberg, and what criteria do the guests have to fulfil in order to be invited?
Bilderberg, from its inception, has been administered by a small nucleus of persons, appointed since 1954 by a committee of the wise men, which is made up of a permanent chair, an American chair, European and an American secretary and treasurer. The annual invitations are only sent out to important and respected people who, through their special knowledge, personal contacts and influence in national and international circles, can amplify the objectives and resources of the Bilderberg Group.
Nobody can buy their way into a Bilderberg meeting, although many corporations have tried. The steering committee decides who to invite — what the Guardian newspaper of London aptly calls a “Bilderberg person”, that hasn’t changed in 50 years of secret meetings — a Fabian Socialist (Translation: Fabianism believes in what it describes as “the democratic control of society in all its activities.” The key word is control of the individual. This as being best achieved through global government, a goal it shares with Communism) and a One World Order enthusiast.
What means do they use in order to keep their activity silent and away from the media?
Big time media is part of the world elite and with the slyness of a slave, they don’t need to be told by the Bilderbergers to keep the meeting secret. They do it voluntarily. The Washington Post, The New York Times, Grupo Prisa in Spain, Le Monde, The Economist, the Wall Street Journal, Toronto Star, the National Post to name just a few, fully realize the advantages of cooperating with the Bilderbergers.
They also know what will happen if they are to “betray” the most secret of secret societies. Newspapers live and die by the advertising they take in. Do you know how simple it is for Rockefeller, the Prime Minister of Canada, Etienne Davingnon, and other influential Bilderbergers to pick up the phone and tell GE, Siemens, Mercedes, Novartis, etc., to stop advertising in such and such media?
Actually, as all the biggest and the most powerful corporations in the world belong to the Bilderbergers, they police themselves. For those not entirely convinced what may happen to them, we have a case of Richard Nixon being destroyed in the false Watergate crisis for the entire world to see, as I explain in my new best seller on the Bilderbergers.
Or the case of Argentina being destroyed, again, for the whole world to see by the New World Order in the Falkland’s War because Argentina was willing to sell nuclear power, the cleanest, cheapest, and best source of energy to Mexico against the wishes of the Global Masters. So, Kissinger gave the order to attack.
If the President of the US can be put out of business, or an independent nation be subjugated, what chance, I ask you, does a newspaper have against the all-powerful Bilderbergers? So, the big-time media follows every direction and command without as much as a whimper.
What would you consider to be the more “curious coincidences” for some of Bilderberger recruits?
The most dramatic example of a “useful recruit” was the obscure governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton, who attended his first Bilderberg meeting at Baden Baden, Germany, in 1991. There, Clinton was told what NAFFA (North American Free Trade Agreement) is by David Rockefeller, and that he was to support it. The next year, he was elected President. Tony Blair attended a Bilderberg meeting in 1993, became party leader in July 1994, and became Prime Minister in May 1997. John Edwards was invited to a Bilderberg meeting in 2004, several weeks later to be “chosen” John Kerry’s Vice Presidential candidate. The fact that Edwards wasn’t invited back this year suggests to me that his political career is over by the way he was discarded as an old shoe by the Bilderbergers.
What Canadians have participated in previous Bilderberg meetings?
There have been many over the years; this is just a partial list: Donald S. MacDonald, ex-Finance Minister; Conrad Black, Ralph Klein, Israel Asper of the CanWestCapital Group; Lloyd Axworthy, Isabel-Bassett, Parl. Assistant Finance Minister of Ontario; Jean Chretien, Marshall A. Cohen of Olympia & York; Stephane Dion, A.L. Flood, Chairman, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce; Louise Frechette, Deputy Secretary-General, United Nations; David Frum from the National Post; Peter C. Godsoe, Chairman and CEO, Bank of Nova Scotia; Allan E. Gotlieb, former Ambassador to the US; Michael Harris; Donald J. Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD; Preston Manning; Paul Martin; Stephen Harper; etc.
What are some of the Bilderberger objectives?
Amongst some of their more ambitious plans are the creation of a One World Government with a single globalized marketplace, policed by a world army; a single global currency financially regulated by a world bank; a universal church as an outlet to channel mankind’s inherent religious belief in the direction desired by the New World Order.
All other religions of the world will be destroyed; empowering international bodies to completely destroy all national identity through subversion from within. Only universal values will be allowed to flourish in the future; creation of “the post-industrial zero-growth society” (Translation: Zero growth is necessary to destroy vestiges of prosperity and be able to divide the society into owners and slaves. When there is prosperity, there is progress, which makes repression a lot harder to execute) which is meant to bring an end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear generated electric power (except for the computer and service industries.)
The remaining Canadian and American industries will be exported to poor countries such as Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Nicaragua, etc., where slave labor is cheap. One of the principal objectives for NAFTA will then be realized; empowering the United Nations until it becomes a demure, as well as a de facto, world government. Advancing this goal by creating a direct UN tax on “world citizens,” expanding NAFTA throughout the Western Hemisphere as a prelude to creating an “American Union” similar to the European Union; establishing NATO as the UN’s world army.
What are some of Bilderberger achievements?
Bilderberg proposed and decided to establish formal relations with China before Nixon’s administation made it publicly known policy. At a meeting in Saltsjöbaden, Sweden, in 1973, Bilderbergers agreed to increase the price of oil to $12 a barrel, a 350% jump, in order to create economic chaos in the United States and Western Europe, as part of the “softening up” policy.
In 1983, Bilderbergers got a secret promise out of the then “ultraconservative” President Ronald Reagan to transfer $50 billion of American taxpayers’ money to the Third World and communist countries through its favourite conduits, the IMF and the World Bank, in order to pay the interest the Bilderbergers owed on their loans to the Western banks. That pledge was more than kept and became known as the Brady Plan.
The Bilderberg-orchestrated decision of getting rid of Margaret Thatcher as British Prime Minister, because she opposed the wilful hand-over of British sovereignty to the European Super State designed by the Bilderbergers. And incredulously, we all watched as her own party sold her out in favour of the Bilderberg poodle — John Major.
In 1985, Bilderbergers were ordered to give full support to the Strategic Defence Initiative (Star Wars), long before it became the official policy of a US government, grounding it on the premise that it would grant unlimited riches to the Masters of the Universe.
At their 1990 meeting at Glen Cove, Long Island, in New York, they decided that taxes had to be raised to pay more towards the debt owed to the International Bankers. Bilderberg ordered President [George] Bush Sr. to increase taxes in 1990, and watched him sign off of the tax-hiking “budget agreement” that lost him the election.
The multimillion dollar sale of Ontario Hydro, whose owner at the time was the Canadian Government, was discussed for the first time at the Bilderberg meeting in King City, Toronto, Canada, in 1996. Shortly after, Ontario Hydro was broken up into five independent companies and privatised.
Leaked reports from the 2002 meeting stated that the war in Iraq had been delayed until March 2003 at a time when every newspaper im the world was expecting the attack to be launched in the summer of 2002.
Splintering of Canada
Splintering of Canada. This theme was originally scheduled for discussion in 1997, but unexpected Bilderberg media coverage in the Toronto Star, Canada’s leading daily during the 1996 meeting in King City, forced the globalists to postpone their plan to 2007.
Really!!! I think our readers would love to hear the details of the plan to destroy Canada!
The long and short of it is that the Bilderbergers planned the destruction of Canada through the Quebec referendum which they themselves organised, which also ties into a billion dollar scheme they concocted to steal Canada’s water supply through the Grand Canal project. Of course, to destroy Canada, these vile people needed NAFTA and GATT as a precursor to US-Canadian continental union by 2007. That’s the intended result. However, as you well know, not every plan, no matter how brilliantly set up, can be executed to perfection.
Do you remember Quebec’s supposedly “authentic” independence drive in 1995? It was all a hoax. Through my intelligence sources, I discovered that Quebec was to separate from Canada abruptly via a Unilateral Declaration of Independence, orchestrated by the Rockefeller-controlled Canadian politicians. Most of the key political figures on both sides, though apparently in “opposition” to each other, are connected to David Rockefeller such as Brian Mulroney, ex Prime Minister; Lucien Bouchard, separatist PQ leader brought into politics by Brian Mulroney; Preston Manning also controlled by the Rockefeller-Bilderberg combines; Jean Chretien, ex-Prime Minister, liberal party, controlled by David Rockefeller.)
Let me give you an example:
John Rae was a leading strategist for former Prime Minister Chretien’s election campaign. He was also an Executive Vice-President of Power Corp. and Paul Desmarais’ right-hand man.
His brother is Bob Rae, ex-NDP Premier of Ontario (who is now running for the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada), who appointed Maurice Strong to the chairmanship of Ontario Hydro, which he proceeded to dramatically cut in both skilled human resources amd generating capacity (to provide a future need for power from James Bay/Grand Canal.)
Paul Martin, former Canada’s Prime Minister, rose through the ranks at Power Corp., mentored by Paul Desmarais. He also attended the 1996 meeting of the-Bilderberg Group where the dismantlement of Ontario Hydro is hotly debated.
Jean Chretien’s daughter, France, is married to Andre Desmarais, son of Paul Desmarais, chairman of Power Corporation. Chretien’s “advisor, counsellor and strategist” for the past 30 years has been Mitchell Sharp, who brought Chretien into politics when he was Finance Minister. Sharp has been, since 1981, Vice-Chairman for North America of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission. Chretien, like so many lackeys, attended the 1996 meeting of the Bilderberg Group in King City, Toronto.
However, there is much more.
Daniel Johnson, former leader of the Quebec Liberal party and Quebec Premier in 1994, also rose through the ranks of Power Corp.
Brian Mulroney needs no introduction. He is one of the most hated Prime Ministers in Canada’s history. He was also a lawyer and a lobbyist for Power Corporation and a member of the board of Archer-Daniels-Midland, a Rockefeller-owned conglomerate, which was headed by Dwayne Andreas who, like Rockefeller himself, is also a member of the Bilderberg Group.
Finally, you have Mike Harris, former Premier of Ontario, close friend of George Bush and Paul Martin. Harris, like his colleague Ralph Klein of Alberta, is also a Bilderberger.
So, the former federal Conservative Party (via Mulroney), the Liberal Party (via Chretien) and the NDP (via Rae) are all tightly connected to… Paul Desmarais and Power Corp. And we have the Prime Minister, the Finance Minister, and the Prime Minister’s key aide all tightly connected to… Paul Desmarais and Power Corp.
Power Corp. co-chief executives Andre Desmarais, left, and Paul Desmarais Jr., right, leave with their father, Paul Desmarais Sr., after the company’s annual meeting in Montreal Thursday, May 11, 2006. Paul Desmarais Sr. was obviously one of the attendees at this year’s Bilderberger meeting.
If you have ever wondered why the same experts and politicians, though apparently representing opposing ideologies, always seem to appear on news, political debates, and current event programs, all pushing the same line, now you have the answer.
Who would benefit from Quebec’s separation?
The answer is the Bilderberg Group. The ultimate outcome was a planned Continental Union of the U.S. and Canada by the early 21st century, in which both would be regionalized. This would necessitate a new Constitution for the resulting United States of North America. A fundamental piece of this jigsaw puzzle was a little known “Grand Canal” water-transfer project, a scheme estimated to cost between $80 billion and $130 billion.
Never heard of the continent-wide “Grand Canal” project? GRAND being an acronym for Great Recycling and Northern Development — envisages a dike across James Bay and the creation of a new fresh-water lake through the impoundment of rivers that now empty into the bay. This fresh water would then be pumped back to the Great Lakes basin and beyond. (See the article “The planned destruction of Canada” in the March-April, 2002 issue of Michael.)
Not surprising — the Bilderbergers, the Canadian Government, and the media whores such as Conrad Black and Robert S. Prichard, president of Torstar Media Group (Toronto Star) and a 2005 Bilderberg attendee, aren’t too keen to publicize it!
When I found out about Rockefeller financing every Canadian politician, I went back and re-read everything I could get my hands on regarding NAFTA. There is a lot of talk in NAFTA about “free flowing water being free.” It is obvious, isn’t it! Then, why is it in the document? Because when you put up dikes, you can suddenly charge for the water.
Think of money. If you had your choice, if you could pull a genie out of a bottle, and the genie could grant three wishes, what would your three wishes be? Remember your goal is to make the most money possible? Number one, give me control over the sun. Number two, give me control over the air. Number three, give me control over water. Now, leaving our little genie aside, we know we cannot control the sun, nor can we control the air, but we can control water. On the scale of things that are required for human life, it is the most important element that can be controlled.
The Bilderbergers thought they could get away with another media blackout. Not to be. When Canadian media got wind of it, it quickly spread like wildfire. A trickle turned into a torrential downpour, and Canadians were on to them. It is one thing not to report the news, quite another to be an accomplice in the willful destruction of your own country. On record, that was their worst defeat ever.
This article was published in the June-July-August, 2006 issue of “Michael”.
Hello Dear Reader, ‘received this excellent video from brasschecktv of ‘interview back in the 1980′s of american politician & member of the US House of Representatives Larry McDonald who, not long after it was recorded was killed in a plane crash in mysterious circumstances (sound familiar ?)
What upsets me most is that he’s telling the world the very same things that myself & many others are STILL saying ! Why on earth have we not made progress in all the intervening years ??? Is anybody out there ???
And just listen to Tom Braden, he tries to out-smart Larry McDonald at every turn & consistently mentions the word ‘conspiracy’ over & over, comes across as such an obvious mouthpiece for the illuminati that it’s almost embarrassing.
Anyway folks, come to your own conclusions, love to you all, Janie, xxx
“The state is the coldest of all cold monsters. Coldly it lies, too; and this lie creeps from its mouth: I, the state, am the people.’…Everything about it is false; it bites with stolen teeth.” Friedrich Nietzsche 1844-1900
Hello Dear Reader, what a world eh ! The policy makers of today surely must be psychopathic ( see video for description of a psychopath)
Common Purpose Leaders every one of them no doubt, The Frankfurt School of Subversion’s plans on how to destroy a society from the inside are almost all in place.
But not quite. I am very optimistic that the truth will overcome their nasty, evil desire for total control of our every move by wearing us down incrementally. It won’t work, we’re awake now & refuse to live in a world without freedom.
Love to you all Janie, xxx
“By a very conservative estimate, a hundred million people have died at the hands of their own governments in this century.
Given that record, how bad could anarchy be ?” Joseph Sobran 1946-2010
The following words are from Stop The War Coalition website
This great video is from Brasscheck tv
Actor Ricky Tomlinson demolishes the arguments the government is using for setting back the clock of social justice 70 years. In the right column we list ways in which funding could be found to make the savage attacks on the benefits of the poor, the unemployed and the disabled.
But where’s the money coming from?
The government insists there is no alternative to the slashing of welfare provision for the most vulnerable in our society, whether it be the bedroom tax (£465 million a year), cuts in disability allowance (£2.2 billion a year) or cuts in the National Health Service (£20 billion by 2015).
But there is an alternative. As the figures below show, none of the cuts would be necessary if the huge sums Britain spends on its military and armaments were invested in providing for social need instead of the government’s war machine.
The cost of war
The war machine
Britain spends £43.3 billion a year on its military. This is the fourth biggest military budget in the world, and by a long way the largest in the EU.
Britain is spending £7 billion building two huge new aircraft carriers, even though it has no planes that will be able to use them. It is estimated that buying planes for these carriers would cost £30 billion. This is not stopping the government spending £15 billion buying 150 F-35 jets, which can’t be used on the carriers, each of which will cost over £100 million.
Syria, Mali and Iran
Britain is spending over £4 million a year on the Afghanistan war — which was never justified and everyone knows is unwinnable. The government has learned nothing from the disasters in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya which — as well as the horrific levels of lost lives and destruction — cost Britain around £30 billion. It is now intervening in the Syria and Mali civil wars and threatening with the US an attack on Iran.
Trident Nuclear Missiles
Britain spends close to £3 billion a year on maintaining the Trident nuclear weapons system. The supporters of Trident are unable to say who the enemy is that is being “deterred” by these ultimate weapons of mass destruction, which are widely recognised as unusable because of their potential to destroy the whole world. The government wants to spend over £100 billion upgrading Trident.
The arms industry
Britain is one of the biggest arms dealers in the world. The government spends £700 million a year on subsidies to the arms companies — one form of welfare it has no plans to cut.
Britain’s military spends £750 million a year on its campaign in schools and local communities aimed at persuading young people to join the army while hiding the reality that as soldiers they will be trained to kill and be killed in other people countries.
Social costs of soldiers physically and psychologically damaged by war
If Britain stopped sending young men and women to fight in unjustified wars, we would not have the huge costs in supporting the medical and psychological needs of soldiers who have been severely injured – often losing limbs or eyes – or traumatised. Added to this is the cost of jailing ex-soldiers, who are one in 10 of the total prison population. There are more ex-soldiers in prison than there are fighting in Afghanistan. It costs £100,000 a year to keep an ex-soldier locked up.
Welfare reform, my arse
Welfare reform, my arse. Has Jim Royle parked his chair, feet up, telly on, in the corridors between the Treasury and the Department for Work and Pensions? Employing him as adviser can be the only explanation for the utter rubbish that boils forth from this government on welfare.
Who else could have dreamed up the bedroom tax, a policy so stupid it forces people to leave their homes and drag themselves around the country in search of nonexistent one-bedroom flats?
That one has to be the result of too many hours in front of Jeremy Kyle (no offence) with the heating on full and a can of super-strength lager. It seems as if that is how this government views ordinary people: feckless and useless – poor, because they brought it on themselves, deliberately.
Maybe the cabinet is confused. Twenty-three millionaires in the one room can get like that. But do you know what, enough. Let’s call this government’s welfare policy what it is – wrong, nasty and dishonest.
Off the top of my head, I can list 10 porkies they are spinning to justify the latest stage of their attack on our 70-year-old welfare state.
1. Benefits are too generous
Really? Could you live on £53 a week as Iain Duncan Smith is claiming he could if he had to? Then imagine handing back 14% of this because the government deems you have a “spare room”. Could you find the money to pay towards council tax and still afford to eat at the end of the week?
2. Benefits are going up
They’re not. A 1% “uprating” cap is really a cut. Inflation is at least 2.7% . Essentials like food, fuel and transport are all up by at least that, in many cases far more. Benefits are quickly falling behind the cost of living.
3. Jobs are out there, if people look
Where? Unemployment rose last month and is at 2.5 million, with one million youngsters out of work. When Costa Coffee advertised eight jobs, 1,701 applied.
4. The bedroom tax won’t hit army families or foster carers
Yes it will. Perhaps most cruel of all, the tax will not apply to foster families who look after one kid. If you foster siblings, then tough. But these kids are often the hardest to place. Thanks to George Osborne and IDS, their chances just got worse. And even if your son or daughter is in barracks in Afghanistan, then don’t expect peace of mind as the government still has to come clean on plans for their bedroom.
5. Social tenants can downsize
Really, where? Councils sold their properties – and Osborne wants them to sell what’s left. Housing associations built for families. In Hull, there are 5,500 people told to chase 70 one-bedroom properties.
6. Housing benefit is the problem
In fact it’s rental costs. Private rents shot up by an average of £300 last year. No wonder 5 million people need housing benefits, but they don’t keep a penny. It all goes to landlords.
7. Claimants are pulling a fast one
No. Less than 1% of the welfare budget is lost to fraud. But tax avoidance and evasion is estimated to run to £120bn.
8. It’s those teenage single mums
An easy target. Yet only 2% of single mums are teenagers. And most single mums, at least 59%, work.
9. We’re doing this for the next generation
No you’re not. The government’s admitted at least 200,000 more children will be pushed deeper into poverty because of the welfare changes.
10. Welfare reforms are just about benefit cuts
Wrong. The attack on our welfare state is hitting a whole range of services – privatising the NHS, winding up legal aid for people in debt and closing SureStart centres and libraries. All this will make life poorer for every community.
Some call these myths. I call them lies. We are being told lies about who caused this crisis and lied to about the best way out of it. But I know one thing to be true: this government’s polices will make millions of people poorer and more afraid. To do that when you do not have to, when there are other options, is obscene. That’s why I’m backing union Unite’s OurWelfareWorks campaign in its efforts to help highlight the truth about our welfare state.
Britain’s defence minister says cut welfare spending on the poorest in society to pay for new tanks, aircraft carriers and Trident nuclear submarines.
Following on from Tony Blair’s televised justification of his role in bringing us the Iraq war to search for those elusive WMD, we now have defence minister Philip Hammond’s demand that the military must be allowed to be given money to build its own such weapons with impunity.
After all, we can continue to cut welfare bills to pay for new tanks, aircraft carriers and Trident nuclear submarines.
Hammond’s priorities are, it needs to be said, government priorities. When has any intervention by Britain which involves troops, airstrikes, funding opposition groupings, and covert operations, ever been delayed or halted through lack of money? When has the issue of the cost of such interventions ever been so much as raised when considering whether to go ahead?
This week William Hague is at it again. This time he wants more money for ‘non-lethal’ intervention in Syria, whatever that is. The EU is relaxing its arms embargo on Syria in a move which will make it much easier for EU member states to arm the Syrian opposition. And some of the major states are queuing up to do so.
Britain, whose government is busily evicting single parents and disabled people from their homes now that ‘spare’ bedrooms are deemed a luxury, and is scapegoating the poor, sick and unemployed at a rate not seen since the hated means tests of the 1930s, apparently thinks nothing of funding military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Mali, and of helping to fight wars in Syria.
Foreign secretary Hague’s reasons are inventive as ever. He wants to provide ‘something new to save lives’ — what would be a first for such operations in recent years. So this week he will announce a new package of aid to go to the Syrian opposition. While it excludes bullets although not body armour at present, that is likely to change in the months ahead, with Hague saying he doesn’t rule anything out for the future.
Certainly this was the impression given at a meeting between the opposition and their western and Middle East backers which took place in Rome last week. The Syrian national Coalition appears confident that the EU and US will supply increased arms, and it seems that Turkey is already allowing in more sophisticated weapons.
According to a French military source in Le Figaro, rebel forces are already being trained in Jordan by US, British and French Special Forces.
Despite their talk of peace, the western powers want regime change in Syria as part of their attempt to control the whole Middle East, and they are prepared to back their aim up with military might.
The desire to maintain as sacrosanct British military spending in a period of deep economic crisis is an admission of how central to British politics is its imperial mission, perhaps even more so when its economic weakness is so exposed.
Increasingly the supposed defence of human rights and democracy carried out by these warmongers is being paid for by slashing the living standards of some of the already poorest in one of the richest countries in the world.
.Follow StWCJoin us…Follow us..Watch us…See us…Follow us…..RelatedUK welfare that’s not for cutting: £100bn on pointless nuclear weapons 10 lies we’re told about welfare and how to stop all the cuts Alternative to attacking the poor, the sick, the unemployed: cut spending on warfare A matter of life and death: hospital cuts and the costs of war Austerity and the warfare state: the choice between guns and butter What America could do if it kicked its addiction to war …..
A matter of life and death: hospital cuts and the costs of war
By Shirley Franklin, Defend the Whittington Hospital Coalition
The government has just awarded a contract to BAE Systems of £3 billion to develop a new Trident fleet of submarines and weapons. The cost of plans to renew the whole Trident nuclear missile system is estimated to be over £100 billion.
Britain is spending at present £5 billion a year on the Afghanistan war, which everyone knows is pointless and unwinnable. And last year’s war on Libya and the current British involvement in Mali and Syria shows that there are no limits to UK warmongering, whatever the cost.
Britain spends every year £37.5 billion on defence, to maintain the fiction that it is one of the world’s military big hitters.
We should also remember the hidden war costs arising from sending soldiers to kill and die in other people’s countries. Many return with life-changing injuries or suffering mental trauma. These are tragic casualties of war who not only suffer themselves, but add additional costs to health and social care budgets.
And we have the grotesque statistic that one in ten of Britain’s prison population is an ex-soldier, most of them having served on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. The cost of keeping locked up these “heroes” — formerly lauded by the tabloid media but now forgotten — is £100,000 each a year.
While these vast sums are squandered on maintaining Britain’s war machine, the government is telling hospitals across the country that they must make £20 billion of cuts by 2015.
The impact this will have on services for the health needs and care of an aging and expanding population is obvious. My hospital, the Whittington in north London is threatened with hundreds of job cuts — including over 200 nurses and ward closures with the loss of dozens of beds.
We are told the reduced level of staffing and beds can be covered by discharging patients early, and making them rely on “care in the community” provided by private health companies, with non-NHS staff, employed on far worse private health conditions.
The plan for bed closures is dangerous. Already there is a bed crisis in our area. The hospital has a bed occupancy rate of 94%, where the recommended figure is 84%. There are currently “red alerts” with insufficient beds for hospital care needs. If there was a large-scale accident at one of our local institutions or tube stations, where would the injured be treated?
The very existence of the NHS is under threat in the government’s rush to privatise everything that is a service for the many and turn it into a private business which is a source of profit for the few.
We need to highlight continually the contrast between cuts threatening to destroy the NHS as a public service and the never-ending costs of Britain’s war machine. It really is a matter of life and death. And either way the government has blood on its hands.
Hello Dear Reader, The Bilderbergs are having their annual get together here in Britain, first time in over 60 years.
This extremely secretive bunch of fraudsters & crooks sorry I mean business leaders, bankers, heads of state & royalty meet yearly mainly to discuss where they want to steer humanity next & how to ensure we’re manipulated enough to allow them to bring about total control of our lives & our minds before our full potential is realised.
The Bilderberg’s are full of the kind of people? you’d expect: Mandelson, Osbourne, Kissinger et al, you know the sort; caring, kind, considerate !!! David Rockerfeller is always present at these unholy gatherings, there’s a bit about him at the end of this post, ‘nice person !
The following article was actually printed in the ‘Watford Observer’ (they’re meeting in Watford) a local newspaper, I emailed the editor last night to ask if he knew anything about it & lo & behold they have reported on it today, quite astounding really, thank God some journalist’s worth their salt are still to be found, really encouraging. Love to you all, Janie, xxx
“Those who manipulate the organized habits and opinions of the masses constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” Edward Bernays
Hertfordshire taxpayers will foot the bill for a major police security operation to protect a shadowy summit of world leaders taking place in Watford next month.
The Bilderberg Group of around 140 influential figures including royalty, politicians and business leaders will meet at The Grove from June 6 to June 9.
To ensure privacy, all 227 rooms at The Grove hotel are booked for the duration of the meeting.
Hertfordshire Constabulary has confirmed to the Watford Observer it will be policing the event, which is likely to attract protestors from across the globe.
Watford’s elected mayor, Dorothy Thornhill, said she had mixed feelings about whether the summit was a good thing for the town.
She said: “I have my concerns about it because it does attract people who can and do cause violence and disturbance.
“But I am confident the police will be able to minimise that and give them their right to protest.
“I am ambivalent about whether this is a good thing. It’s potentially a positive thing as long as things don’t kick off.
“I am concerned about the use of police resource but it is very good The Grove has been deemed a prestigious enough venue.”
..The guest list for the “small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum” event is kept a closely guarded secret until the meeting is underway but attendees to previous events include Chancellor George Osborne, Labour peer Lord Mandelson, Nobel Peace Prize winner Henry Kissinger and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands – who abdicated last month in favour of her son.
In 1993 Tony Blair denied to parliament that he had attended the Bilderberg meeting.
It is understood police are mounting a major security operation using a local rugby club as an operational base for the duration of the meeting.
A Hertfordshire Constabulary spokesman confirmed the event was taking place but declined to comment on operational policing details or the potential financial cost.
The spokesman added the force would “facilitate people who want to undertake peaceful protest” and that police leave would be cancelled if it was deemed necessary to maintain the peace.
The group’s annual meetings have in the past attracted storms of protests from campaigners who accuse it of hijacking the democratic process Among the more outlandish critics are writer and public speaker David Icke, who claims the group’s influential steering committee is made up of 12 foot lizards known as “Reptoids”.
Hertfordshire police and crime commissioner David Lloyd refused to comment on the police operation.
“Oh my God, we’ve really got away with it haven’t we.”
“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, wrote that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approx (US) $11 trillion.
David Rockefeller (1915-), before a Congressional Committee, “You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart.”
Amsel (Amschel) Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838: “Let me issue and control a Nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws”.
Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): “I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply.”
Hello Dear Reader, as you’re here you’ll surely be aware of some very profound changes occuring both to ourselves & the planet, I know it has a lot to do with the solar flares & the shifting of the earth’s poles etc; but there’s also quite a shift in the balance between us & them !
I don’t like to sound too dualistic but you have to admit that with our present awareness ‘they’ (the elite, illuminati, occultist’s, whatever) appear to be at opposing ends of the spiritual spectrum to us, & I really sense now that we’re on the winning side, even the thickest of people are realising that they have been fed a pack of lies from the beginning of time.
Anyway I digress as this video is about an ex-military man Philip Schneider, who died in suspicious circumstances (quelle surprise !) after exposing what he knew about secret underground bases, very interesting, it was produced by two very credible writers Richard Sauder & Richard Dolan, please watch, love to you all, Janie, xxx
“I wouldn’t call it fascism exactly, but a political system nominally controlled by an irresponsible, dumbed down electorate who are manipulated by dishonest, cynical, controlled mass media that dispense the propoganda of a corrupt political establishment can hardly be described as democracy either.” edward Zehr 1936-2001 Columnist
Hello Dear Reader, another post on the very controversial subject of vaccines. Parent’s must wake up and open their minds to the very real damage that’s befallen our precious children since the advent of vaccines.
Research the many neuro-toxins included in the contents of the vaccinations they subject their children to.
Research too, the unacceptable rise in childhood illnesses and disease since the introduction of these poisons.
Here in the UK there’s been non-stop coverage alluding to the irresponsibility of parents that have chosen not to vaccinnate their children turning those that choose to againgst the former.
The divide and rule tactic is very much alive in Orwell’s Britain.
It beggars belief as to how many very intelligent parent’s go along with the official spiel bandied about by those in the medical profession.
Please educate yourself and others about this crucial subject..
Watch the following excellent trailer of a documentary called The Greater Good.
Love to you all, Janie, xxx
Ps it’s being shown free in Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey, UK this Weds; Eve; 1st May
“Why is it that only since the 40′s have autism and brain damage come about ? Because this was when immunisation was introduced to a large extent…”Dr Peter Baratosy-
Hello Dear Reader, the vaccination agenda is very close to my heart, my grandchildren have not been vaccinated simply because it’s a huge hoax, a cruel hoax at the expense of our precious children’s lives and well-being.
And with the current climate of fear here in the UK, bullying and pressurising confused parents to do as they’re told and to get their children vaccinated or be reviled by the masses, I had to post this today.
Of course the ‘programmed’ doctor’s and nurses administering these poisons into tiny bodies haven’t a clue what’s going on in the shadows and mechanically do as they’re told.
Do you really think that a government that lies about going to war, terrorists, climate change, the financial crisis, expenses, genetically modified food and everything else, really cares about your childs health ??? Pleeease !!!
Look at following videos & an informative article by Terri L Sanders to become more informed. Love to you all, Janie, xxx
“It was clearly shown that the only people that got smallpox TWICE were the vaccinated…You can be LOADED with antibodies and still get, even DIE from the disease…” Dr Archie Kalokerinos
The Truth About Vaccines
by Terri L. Saunders
It is common modern practice to vaccinate children beginning in infancy, supposedly to protect them against a variety of diseases which “threaten” mankind. In truth, however, it is these very vaccines that are threatening the health and genetic integrity of the human race. Before the advent of vaccines, many childhood diseases such as measles, mumps and whooping cough were adequately handled by the immune systems of children raised in a drugless society. It was not until the beginning of mass immunization of children in the 1950’s that these same diseases appeared to cause grave injury or death. In fact, in 1950, before routine vaccinations became a reality, the United States had the third lowest infant mortality rate in the world. By 1986, the U.S. infant mortality rate dropped to 17th place and by 1995 the U.S. had fallen further to 24th place.
There is a vast difference between natural immunity acquired as nature intended it and the invasive immunization practice derived from vaccination. Immediately after birth, newborn infants who are breast fed, receive antibodies through their mother’s milk. When a child or adult gets a disease naturally, the virus or bacteria travels through the nose or mouth into the lungs and into the circulatory and lymphatic systems, providing antibody and cellular protection. In contrast, when concentrated pathogenic microorganisms are injected directly into the body, they bypass the natural defense system and disease sets in. This challenges the immune system, and immunity is often short-lived.
When one understands what exactly is in these vaccines and how they are made, one would wonder how vaccines could possibly be of any benefit to health. Vaccines are produced from either dead or live attenuated (weakened) disease microorganisms. In the dead vaccines, viruses or bacteria have been inactivated by heat, radiation or poisonous chemicals. However, there is no guarantee that all of the microorganisms have been killed. If just one microbe survives it can multiply very rapidly and actually create the disease. This has been known to happen. In fact, every case of polio during the 1980’s was caused by the polio vaccine.
Vaccines created from live attenuated viruses and bacteria are made from the pus of animals that have been infected with disease and then butchered. In these vaccines, the live virus must be weakened by passing the virus through animal tissue several times to reduce its potency for human use. The measles virus is passed through chick embryos, the polio virus through monkey kidneys, and the rubella virus through the dissected organs of an aborted human (yes human!) fetus. The weakened germ is then stabilized by adding drugs, antibiotics, and toxic disinfectants such as neomycin, streptomycin, aluminum hydroxide, formaldehyde, and thimerosal (a mercury derivative). Studies have shown that even microscopic dosages of some of these substances can lead to cancer, neurological damage, and death.
Because of the way vaccines are prepared, additional contaminants may pose more serious concerns. During the serial passage of viruses through the animal cells, foreign genetic material (animal RNA and DNA) is transferred from one host to another. This biological matter is then injected directly into the human body. According to some researchers, this could change our genetic makeup.
The vaccine development process also allows undetected animal viruses to jump the species barrier. This actually happened during the 1950’s and 1960’s when millions of people were infected with polio vaccines that were contaminated with Simian Virus #40 contracted from the monkey organs used to prepare the vaccines. This virus is a powerful immunosuppressor and trigger for the HIV virus. It is said to cause a condition similar to AIDS, and has been found in brain tumors, leukemia and other forms of human cancer.
Are vaccines effective in preventing disease? The evidence proves that they are not. According to the international mortality statistics, there was at least a 95% decline in the incidence and severity of these diseases before the introduction of their vaccines. Measles has apparently returned, with a death rate twenty times higher than before the measles vaccine became available. Before England passed a mandatory vaccination law in 1853, the highest death rate from smallpox in any two-year period was 2,000 cases. However between 1870 and 1872 alone, 45,000 people died from smallpox. Not surprisingly, deaths from smallpox fell dramatically after people began refusing the shots.
The DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) vaccine is perhaps the most controversial childhood vaccine. According to pediatrician Dr. Lendon Smith, nearly all doctors have seen whooping cough (pertussis) in children who have been fully vaccinated with this shot. Side effects for the DPT shot range from high fever, continuous high-pitched screaming, severe rashes, diarrhea, choking, apnea, seizures, mental and physical retardation, and in many cases, death. A study done by Dr. Michel Odent found that children receiving the pertussis vaccine were more than six times more likely to develop asthma than children not receiving the vaccine. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) was virtually unheard of until this vaccine was routinely given. The Japanese noticed this relationship and began delaying DPT vaccination until two years of age at which time SIDS disappeared. In the U.S., SIDS deaths average 8,000 per year. American babies still receive their first DPT shot at two months of age.
Other known vaccine-related side effects are attention deficit disorder and hyperactivity, arthritis, hydroencephalopy (fluid buildup on the brain), multiple sclerosis, meningitis, ulcerative colitis, crohn’s disease and chronic fatigue syndrome. Some of these diseases may not surface for up to forty years. The Gulf War Syndrome has also been linked to vaccinations and drug experimentation done on soldiers. It is interesting to note that, while military personnel from several countries participated in this war, only the U.S. military suffers from this syndrome.
Authorities will often warn of dangerous epidemics pending in a fear-based campaign to get parents to vaccinate their children. In 1991, newspapers in Placitas, New Mexico warned of a dangerous whooping cough epidemic, but only three cases of whooping cough were discovered, all in children who were vaccinated.
Because of the extensive cases of vaccine-induced injury and death, and related lawsuits against the companies who produced the vaccines, The National Childhood Injury Act was created in 1986 to compensate families whose children had been injured or died from vaccines. From July, 1990 to March, 1994 more than 34,000 cases of injury were reported, including hundreds of cases of brain damage and over 700 deaths. These numbers represent only 10% of actual cases, since according to the FDA, 90% of doctors do not report vaccine reactions. Compensation comes from a federal fund, not from the vaccine manufacturers. It is funded by a percentage of the cost of each vaccine, paid for by the patient at the time the vaccine is given. This practice effectively exempts both the government and vaccine manufacturers from taking responsibility for vaccine damage.
In spite of all the evidence against the efficacy and safety of vaccines plans are in the works for a “super vaccine” or “magic bullet” vaccine containing raw DNA from forty different kinds of bacteria and viruses. This vaccine would be given to all newborn infants and time-released in the body throughout life.
By now, it should be clear that vaccination is not an effective form of immunization. Only nature is capable of immunizing the body. Injecting vibrant healthy bodies with virulent microorganisms is an assault to the immune system. In countries such as Sweden and Australia where vaccination is not mandatory, parents are free to make the choice to vaccinate their children without hassle. In the U.S., where most people are not told that they have a choice, it is possible to refuse immunization based on religious exemptions or personal convictions. Each state has its own policy for waiving vaccinations. For children and even adults who have been vaccinated, there are natural therapies that can build the immune system and, in many cases, reverse the damage done by vaccines.
For a simply presented, yet highly informative book on vaccines, I highly recommend Immunization, Theory vs. Reality, by Neil Z. Miller. As more people realize the truth about vaccines, perhaps we can eradicate this practice altogether, and ensure a safe, healthy future for our children.
Terri L. Saunders is an Herbalist and Certified Natural Health Professional in Charlottesville, Virginia, where she does private consultations, telephone consultations, and classes on natural healing. She can be reached at Sunrise Herb Shoppe, a unique holistic resource center for cutting edge natural health products and books. For information call 434-984-2665, or visit our web site at www.sunriseherbshop.com , or e-mail at email@example.com .
Hello Dear Reader, as always so many topics to report on but after receiving this video from a friend I decided to post it.
It’s the first time I’ve heard of this brave lady although this was filmed at the time of the unlawful invasion of Libya.
It’s fascinating viewing and gives us yet another opinion as to what happened on 9/11.
Those of you that feel yourselves stifling a yawn at the mention of 9/11 after so long just remind yourself of the extent of manipulation that’s been employed by the elite to dominate and control the masses to a terrifying level.
Despite that the New World Order has been in the making for a very long time it’s implementation went into overdrive that day causing the chaos and sorcery that we now see all around us.
Love to you all, Janie, xxx
“It may be your intent to be our masters; how can it be ours to be your slaves ?” Melians (Melians to Athenians, Peloponnesian War, 431 BC
Hello Dear Reader, ‘just got this clip & I’m in a rush, the Boston bomb exploded ….wait for it…just as an exercise of some kind (military maybe) ? was taking place !!! can you believe they’re still using that same ol’ cover story ! come on folks, spread the word.
Research simultaneous exercises occurring alongside 9/11, 7/7, love to you all, Janie, xxx
“The first people totalitarians destroy or silence are men of ideas and free minds.” Isaiah Berlin 1907 – 1997
More evidence of a training exercise at Boston Marathon